Obstruction of Justice...

[Jarod]

Lets start at the start...

Does everyone agree Obstruction of Justice is a crime?

[Jarod]

Dont want to say? I understand...

[Nordberg]

Trump has obstructed many times. I hope he does not get away with it.

[Cypress]

I think we are way beyond the "nothing burger" phase, and way down the rabbit hole, folks.

Short of eating babies on live television, I actually think no amount of lying, corruption, collusion, incompetence, and deception are going to dissuade those who used to support impeachment for a consensual blowjob, from supporting Trump with every fiber of their being.

[Bourbon]

Lets start at the start...

Does everyone agree Obstruction of Justice is a crime?

I bet if you do it, you’d go to Jail ...

[Truth Detector]

Lets start at the start...

Does everyone agree Obstruction of Justice is a crime?

Agreed.

[Truth Detector]

Trump has obstructed many times. I hope he does not get away with it.

Lying liberal moron doesn't know what obstruction of justice is.

[Truth Detector]

I think we are way beyond the "nothing burger" phase, and way down the rabbit hole, folks.

Brain dead clueless liberal thinks this is IT!!! How many times are you foinf to erupit with this stupidity and look like an ass before you comprehend you look like an ass? That was rhetorical of course.

[Truth Detector]

I bet if you do it, you’d go to Jail ...

Do what snowflake?

[Truth Detector]

I am betting no one on this thread can coherently argue what it is Trump did.

Here you go idiots; pick one:

18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/t...t-I/chapter-73

[Bourbon]

They’re starting to come apart and piss on themselves.

[LutherF]

18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees



Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


---------
That's the definition that matters. Now, the question is does tweeting something along the lines of "Mueller is on a witch hunt" rise to that definition?

Does destroying a server that is supposed to be used as evidence against Russian hackers rise to that definition?

[canceled.2021.2]

18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees



Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


---------
That's the definition that matters. Now, the question is does tweeting something along the lines of "Mueller is on a witch hunt" rise to that definition?

Does destroying a server that is supposed to be used as evidence against Russian hackers rise to that definition?

And if said server is under subpoena

[Truth Detector]

They’re starting to come apart and piss on themselves.

[Truth Detector]

18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees



Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.


---------
That's the definition that matters. Now, the question is does tweeting something along the lines of "Mueller is on a witch hunt" rise to that definition?

Does destroying a server that is supposed to be used as evidence against Russian hackers rise to that definition?

Idiot thinks cutting and pasting the law is an argument.

Snowflake, look at me, what is Trump doing to obstruct justice? Moron.