He's a tricky one because he and I have had many reasonable debates about things, and I think he's struggling with a lot of baggage unrelated to JPP.
So I'm more content to give him a break than...
Type: Posts; User: LV426
He's a tricky one because he and I have had many reasonable debates about things, and I think he's struggling with a lot of baggage unrelated to JPP.
So I'm more content to give him a break than...
What a fucking loudmouth...you oinked about a stolen election for two months, but hid out here on JPP the one day you could have done something about it.
LITTLE. BITCH.
Prove it. Prove that I selectively edited something. Go ahead. I DARE YOU.
Only this time, link to the posts, don't take a screenshot like a little bitchass.
That warrant is going to be really, really bad for Trump.
Thing is, if there was any sort of misconduct, Trump's lawyers could have gotten an injunction from a court, but they're either incredibly...
Also, kind of a bitch move to not include the link to the actual post...but innuendo is pretty much all you're capable of at this point.
So when we look at this thumbnail, what do we see? We see...
Anyone can see the thread and see that you're lying.
I didn't selectively edit anything...I quoted that sentence in full and responded to it for your benefit.
A little gratitude would be nice.
No I didn't. It was the whole sentence, period and all.
You're trying to say that I didn't quote your entire post, but I wasn't bothering to address the rest of your entire post.
I was...
How so?
How was Clinton the "greater evil" in 2016?
Is it because she's a woman? Is that why you consider her the greater evil?
So Clinton didn't steal 27 boxes of documents?
I didn't selectively edit anything...I quoted the first sentence of your post and responded to that.
Why are you lying? Anyone can look at the thread and see for themselves.
You might think so and you're only thinking that because of how I'm schooling you on economics on this thread.
So you're searching for something to make me feel as insecure as I make you feel all...
LMAO!
I quoted your sentence in full and responded to that quoted sentence in full.
What are you complaining about?
Well because of demand.
Do you not support supply and demand?
The net result of that was economic growth and job creation, so I guess you oppose growth and job creation because you can't wrap your head around the economics of either.
No, wealth is created in the exchange of currency for goods.
THAT is how wealth is created.
Wealth is not created by stocking your warehouse with surplus manufactured goods...that doesn't...
OK, but what you haven't done is make the connection between manufacturing and growing an economy.
Merely manufacturing things doesn't grow an economy...what grows the economy is when those things...
LMAO! The fact that he had to turn over 27 boxes of documents.
Ah, but I did quote you in full, I just didn't quote the additional garbage you wrote.
You rush through your responses and end up sloppy as shit.
How does manufacturing contribute to GDP, if you think manufacturing is what grows an economy and not spending?
Because you keep making the same mistakes.
Lay off the bottle, drunkie.
You used my words against yourself.
I said you ran your big, fat mouth about a stolen election for two months, only to chicken out the one day it mattered.
See, you just can't stop yourself from stealing my posts.
I think my posts get under your skin so deeply, that the only recourse your tiny mind can think of is to just take what I wrote and repeat...
TO BUY
TO BUY
TO BUY
That is economic activity.
Manufacturing is not.
SPENDING is the ONLY THING that grows an economy.
Manufacturing does not because it's all cost on a P&L.
You don't know what you're talking about and you're doing more damage to your cause...