I stand corrected.
Type: Posts; User: Canceled.2014.1
I stand corrected.
Awww, that is a terrible thing to say!! Mott would never have sex with a goat!
Like most kinks, it doesn't make sense to those who do not enjoy it. I am not into pain with my fun, but some folks love it.
It is a long standing joke.
And usually costs extra.
Changing the slant of the question does not change my answer. I think I have been very clear on this topic.
No, I did not say "allegations = percentage of assailants". But you asked what percentage of the 81% were molested by males. Since the study concerned only catholic priests, I thought it was...
In the context of this discussion, I don't consider "friendly" to be accurate at all.
You asked what percentage of their assailants were male. I pointed out that, per the link, the survey was concerning catholic priests. Since that is what we were discussing, I thought it covered it...
YOu were the one who brought up comfort level. I prefer to stick with accurate assessments.
From the same wiki article I quoted before.
"The 2004 John Jay Report was based on a study of 10,667 allegations against 4,392 priests accused of engaging in sexual abuse of a minor between 1950 and...
As the expert stated, it sounds more accurate. Molestation never sounds friendly to me.
Since the topic of the thread is the catholic church and the hypocrisy in the way it treats gays v. the way it treats pedophile priests, I stayed with the catholic abuses.
So Big Money didn't?
He quoted Wiki in this thread, so I quoted the same source to answer him.
Do you have an issue with the accuracy of what I posted?
Your personal desire to have it mean the same thing is what drives you to ignore the facts that have been presented.
Accurate within the context of this thread.
from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases
"In the United States the 2004 John Jay Report commissioned and funded by the U.S....
Yes they are. But find statistic for molestations by strangers, as in not family or family friend.
No I did not. First I stated that you would NOT be attracted to a child's body. Then, after being challenged on it, I agreed that it was possible but that I had given you the benefit of the doubt. ...
Perhaps I am not worried because I did not call you a pedophile?
Did I call you a pedophile? No, I did not.
Changing someone's quote is OK with you? Good to know.
I have provided sound reasoning as to why boys are molested more.
And someone who is attracted to prepubescent children is not attracted based on their sexual orientation. They are attracted to them BECAUSE they are children.
Are you going to hold your breath until I am banned? Yes, please do that.
I have not seen anyone insist that a child molester cannot be gay. But the relevance of their sexual orientation to their pedophilia is the same as the relevance of their obesity to their...