So now the issue is... where do we draw the line?
Type: Posts; User: Jarod
So now the issue is... where do we draw the line?
Seems that Trumppers are finally embarrassed.
What other cons agree w Taft?
If I understand the defense’s case in the George Floyd murder case... Floyd was on the edge of death AND extremely dangerous?
I agree that a compelling public interest is the standard. Very happy you agree the right is infringable and not absolute. We are making progress.
Not only did Trump lose to Biden, he threw a baby fit and chose to pretend he had it stolen from him, while he was a sitting president.
Both are embarrassing. One more than the other.
1) It...
I agree with you about the limitations, but I have had that very argument about the fire in the theater with Trumppers here on this forum. Glad to see you agree that the Right to Bear Arms can be...
I agree with you, but on this website, many Trumppers claim the right is absolute and refuse to acknowledge any limits, until it suits them.
So, do you understand the meaning of ABSOLUTE?
Absolute: not qualified or diminished in any way; total.
Are you finally agreeing that the Right to Bear Arms is not absolute?
But, but, I am pretty sure the Constitution supersedes Minnesota State law. I think I remember that from law school.
I know you did not attend law school, but I am pretty sure that's the gist,...
I'm not the one claiming the right to bear arms is ABSOLUTE, that's your crew. My point has always been that there are limits to all the constitutional rights, its just about where you draw the...
Good, good, keep it coming. Keep stroking my ego with validation.
I hope its Ted Cruz. Then they can insult each others wives, wildly entertaining.
The Constitution supersedes the law of Illinois. Do Americans have an absolute right to bear arms or not? If so, how can the government demand he disarm or be shot? I thought I heard your ilk...
If they ask you to do it, that is different than demanding that you do it.
You are the one who claims the right to bear arms is ABSOLUTE. It appears, now you are saying that neither the right...
Thanks for the acknowledgement that you have no legit response. Keep it coming.
You don’t think that violates a citizens absolute right to bear arms?
So, are you saying you support limiting absolute Constitutional rights if it saves lives?
You guys are the ones calling it an ABSOLUTE. If it’s not absolute can we are limits on that right? An age limit? Capacity limit? Mental health limit? ??
Keep hiding!
An absolute right is not absolute?
Both parties are, but in the Democratic Party we don’t elect them president.
She is the type Republicans would elect president, glad that in the Democratic Party she is just one Congresswoman.
What happened to the kids absolute Second Amendment rights?
Is the Constitution suspended at 3AM?
Another silly attempt at cancel culture!
When you have no legitimate response, sling an insult... I already know that trick, it doesn’t work, people see how weak you are!