I'm confused now what your position on it is? I agreed with your last comment, so what are we arguing about? And that's unfortunate, I love debating this kind of stuff and hate pissing contests
Type: Posts; User: firefighter34
I'm confused now what your position on it is? I agreed with your last comment, so what are we arguing about? And that's unfortunate, I love debating this kind of stuff and hate pissing contests
Of course. But what's that got to do with anything? Overhead doesn't vary. Wages don't vary. They never know exactly what their profits will be, but they do know exactly what their expenses will be....
Nobody would. It would go against human nature. But there are plenty of people who are so concerned about the poor lower class that they spend a whole 15 mins of their day ranting about how the...
If that's true, I'm out.
Can't make an intelligent point or do anything but try to rile people up? Poor baby. Makes you much easier to ignore though.
Granted. But I'm not talking about nominal donations for tax benefits. I'm talking about giving until they are no longer rich. If the needs of society are greater than the idividuals, why not? My...
Why should I believe the additional overhead employers will have to pay will come at the expense of company profits? I think you geniuses are taking an awful lot for granted. Someone explain it to...
I do see your point about the math. I retract that part of it. Larger principle, still applies. For all I know, he may donate huge amounts of money to charity. But, we never point to the largely...
I'd love for you to try and tell me. That is the purpose of a forum like this. Not resorting to making jest without any counterargument
I'm not sure what's so hard to believe about it. He's been making big budget movies for 30 years and who knows what he was invested in
As reputable as anything you've provided to the contrary, isn't it?
http://mobi.perezhilton.com/2010-10-13-morgan-freeman-divorce-secrets-400-million-to-ex#.V1hTQtYo7qA
Lots of other sources reporting same thing.
Ok
400 million actually, in cash, real estate, stocks etc
I know so, look it up
Hahahaha, hilarious. That was certainly a blistering logical counterpoint. Really proved me wrong, nice. I stand here corrected
This is a valid point you bring up, speaking to conservative hypocrisy. But it begs the question, why is conservative hypocrisy somehow worse than liberal hypocrisy? Hillary Clinton once said the...