So far it's looking like that's a resounding "no". lol
She did in 2020, but not an answer to the question.
In other words, you would have voted for anyone but her to get the nomination, right? ... especially as she was the second most hated woman in America, behind Hillary, ... especially knowing that the only way anyone would attend one of her rallies was at the promise of major celebrities performing at her events, ... especially seeing as how she wasn't waiting for senility to become unable to speak a coherent sentence.
You remember correctly. In 1981, the DNC switched to the "superdelegate" system in order for the party leadership to fully control the party nomination, and to wrest away any voice Democrat voters might have in that process. Fast forward to Bernie Sanders threatening to ruin the DNC's predetermined arrangement for Hillary to be handed the nomination, and out come the superdelegates who, amazingly, all support Hillary and guarantee her the nomination despite Bernie's lead and momentum.
Nobody on the left is saying it, so I'll say it for them. Kamala was nobody's first choice, for all the obvious reasons. Only the DNC wanted Kamala because DNC leadership was hungry to have the first woman President ... but not hungry enough to actually win it with Tulsi Gabbard, who was aligned with Bernie.
Even in Warren and Buttigieg. Either one would have pleased me.
Yeah, that’s obvious. (Apologies for the redundancy)
A defining characteristic of the left
That’s going out on a limb !
Of course not. Just like in 2016 and 2020 and 2924, ) the DNC made it for you. Will they do it again in ‘28 ?
Me? How so?
That’s up to the DNC. Dem voters have no say. Come to think of it, that’s how Russia and China select their leaders.