Should federal troops be policing the states?

If Biden had done that, you would have been insane.

Biden DID do that, so did Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, FDR - all the way back to George Washington.

But you China first democrats think somehow Trump isn't really president and you can deny him the power of the presidency. You are very wrong. I know that the tariffs are hurting China - which angers you, and helping America, which infuriates you. Don't worry - you won't get over it.

Neither you nor I will live long enough to see another democrat elected president. And I plan to live another 30 years.
 
bump

a president overruling how a governor and/or mayor wants to governor is not conservative and you Trumptards defending his statements about Chicago should be ashamed

defending federal buildings or the Capital of the United States is one thing. This is total horseshit
I basically agree. Trump has no authority to move federal troops into Chicago without the approval of the Governor (except to protect federal buildings) - but even radical leftist Joe Scarborough gets it..

View: https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1962879099493310782?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1962879099493310782%7Ctwgr%5E1f35cb778ecaa4e6ec7d4c6a97744e147e173be9%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fmattvespa%2F2025%2F09%2F03%2Feven-msnbc-thinks-illinois-dems-should-work-with-trump-to-curb-crime-in-chicago-n2662657
 
Should federal troops be policing the states?

Not usually. Just when homo-supremacists get guppy on social media and try to bring judao-homo nepotism in every cutting edge technology and narcotic trafficking sectors. When they're 6% of the population, 95% of the partisan hack pundits, and everyone facilitating an invasion of foreign backed criminal syndicates.

Gik3MvbWMAArw6M.jpeg
 
What emergency is that? Name these "fake emergencies" that have you so triggered?
 
LA and Chicago have their problems, as do St. Louis and New Orleans. But trump's not sending troops to Louisiana or Missouri. Don't you think that's strange?

I'm trying to get you to admit the military in blue city streets serve no purpose other than to antagonize people who live in blue states. The fact you don't see that being a reasonable person that you are is just bizarre. You really, really hate the left, don't you?
I think he's doing it one at a time, and likely the places with sanctuary policies first.
 

What is your post supposed to mean?
 
I think he's doing it one at a time, and likely the places with sanctuary policies first.

He can't deploy the guard without a request from Blimpy - unless there are widespread attacks on federal agents and open insurrection like there is in Los Angeles.

Increase the ICE raids and if the cartels and the governments they own react - then he can deploy.
 
Oh, put their foot down? How about getting rid of guns? That would actually solve most of the problems.
Will the government get rid of theirs too? I might listen in that case.

You continue to prove your stupidity Nordberg. Your mind is one dimensional and extremely weak.
 
bullshit

3d printing exists now

criminals break laws - it is what makes them criminals
Nordberg is too simple minded to think through much of anything.

He just reacts after his panic attacks with no thought whatsoever resembling logic.

Sadly he is the average Democrat. Low IQ and noisy.
 
He can't deploy the guard without a request from Blimpy - unless there are widespread attacks on federal agents and open insurrection like there is in Los Angeles.

Increase the ICE raids and if the cartels and the governments they own react - then he can deploy.
Well, he can if he's supporting ICE. It has to be in a supporting role. If the SCOTUS rules his deployment in CA was constitutional I think he'll use that path. Since Chicago is a "sanctuary" city they'll go in and do their thing. The mere presence of the troops will stop some crime, illegals get sent home, it's a "win win" for him.
 
Back
Top