Once again, conservatism proven to produce dumb people with low-effort skills

Damocles said:
Voters as a whole are more educated than society, but the least educated group of voters, according to the study, are the "disadvantaged democrats".
Click to expand...

From your own link;

Liberals were the most educated group with 49% being college graduates compared to an average of 26.5% among all the conservative groups (including the Democratic voting Conservative Democrats).

Of course, the fact that the link refers to conservatives as enterpisers has no bearing on the accuracy of the data.
 
Damocles said:
Voters as a whole are more educated than society, but the least educated group of voters, according to the study, are the "disadvantaged democrats".
Click to expand...
?

What in heck is so difficult to understand about "disadvantaged democrats" ranking lowest in college education stats? I wonder how "disadvantaged repukes" rank? Strike that.
 
Gatorman said:
Conservatives and liberals don't seem to agree about much, and they might not agree about recent studies linking conservatism to low intelligence and "low-effort" thinking.

"Psychological Science" showed that children who score low on intelligence tests gravitate toward socially conservative political views in adulthood--perhaps because conservative ideologies stress "structure and order" that make it easier to understand a complicated world..........................................................

More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...ffort-thinking_n_1410448.html?ref=mostpopular
Click to expand...

Cool-Starry-Bra.jpeg
 
Gatorman said:
?

What in heck is so difficult to understand about "disadvantaged democrats" ranking lowest in college education stats? I wonder how "disadvantaged repukes" rank? Strike that.
Click to expand...

You don't have to wonder, you could have read the study. They are more educated than the disadvantaged democrats.
 
Damocles said:
You don't have to wonder, you could have read the study. They are more educated than the disadvantaged democrats.
Click to expand...

You freeaking liar. You missed my point altogether and then you lie about your own link. There are no "disadvantaged pukes" therefore there are no stats and therefore the article does not address them. Liberal and progressive Dems overall are still the most highly educated in the nation and world and consistently out perform their conservative counterparts. As an advantaged and educated Dem I accept the disadvantaged as personal charges and do all of my part to support them.
 
Since you were thoroughly pwned on that Gov. Wallace thread....you of all the lefty idiots ought to be trying to keep a low profile...

to go with your low IQ....
 
Gatorman said:
You freeaking liar. You missed my point altogether and then you lie about your own link. There are no "disadvantaged pukes" therefore there are no stats and therefore the article does not address them. Liberal and progressive Dems overall are still the most highly educated in the nation and world and consistently out perform their conservative counterparts. As an advantaged and educated Dem I accept the disadvantaged as personal charges and do all of my part to support them.
Click to expand...

You didn't read the study I see. You are clearly one of the lot that spends a lot of time talking but not much time thinking. They make for interesting posters, but aren't much for debate. As I am more for debate than argument (believe me there is a difference) I'll let you go on your merry way.

Remember what the conclusions were, the disadvantaged democrats were the least educated of all groups of voters. It solidly underlines earlier assertions.
 
Damocles said:
You didn't read the study I see. You are clearly one of the lot that spends a lot of time talking but not much time thinking. They make for interesting posters, but aren't much for debate. As I am more for debate than argument (believe me there is a difference) I'll let you go on your merry way.

Remember what the conclusions were, the disadvantaged democrats were the least educated of all groups of voters. It solidly underlines earlier assertions.
Click to expand...

Nice way to encourage people to stay and post on your site.
 
Rana said:
Nice way to encourage people to stay and post on your site.
Click to expand...


Yeah....we should all tell him how intelligent he is.....
a wonderful debater...
so astute....
so up to the minute on current events.........................NOT

Thats the problem with idiots like the lefties here.....they can't handle the truth.....
They can call everybody else stupid and liars but you have to be nice to them........

It was better to have quality posters rather than and influx of idiots we have now, trolling the board....
 
Rana said:
Nice way to encourage people to stay and post on your site.
Click to expand...

The Dancin' Dalai seems to overlook rightwingers that spend a lot of time talking but not much time thinking, doesn't he?
 
Rana said:
Nice way to encourage people to stay and post on your site.
Click to expand...

The guy's a troll. To each his own some people like trolls others don't but just because it's his board doesn't mean Damo needs to kiss a troll's *ss.
 
\\(())// said:
The Dancin' Dalai seems to overlook rightwingers that spend a lot of time talking but not much time thinking, doesn't he?
Click to expand...

truly ironic and rana will not call you out on this. this board is now a left wing propaganda sounding board. damo banned conservative members and now, we have left wing lunatics like you sprouting up everywhere. but you're still whining.

job....get one.
 
cawacko said:
The guy's a troll. To each his own some people like trolls others don't but just because it's his board doesn't mean Damo needs to kiss a troll's *ss.
Click to expand...

Why is he a troll exactly? I guess I need your definition and in case you haven't noticed, there aren't many regular posters left on this forum, so if it were my site and I wanted it to cntinue, I wouldn't be crapping on my posters, either.

So, I will wait for your definition of troll.
 
bravo said:
Yeah....we should all tell him how intelligent he is.....
a wonderful debater...
so astute....
so up to the minute on current events.........................NOT

Thats the problem with idiots like the lefties here.....they can't handle the truth.....
They can call everybody else stupid and liars but you have to be nice to them........

It was better to have quality posters rather than and influx of idiots we have now, trolling the board....
Click to expand...

You are one of the biggest name callers on here, you can't even see your own faults but just project them onto the left. It makes me smile!
 
Rana said:
Why is he a troll exactly? I guess I need your definition and in case you haven't noticed, there aren't many regular posters left on this forum, so if it were my site and I wanted it to cntinue, I wouldn't be crapping on my posters, either.

So, I will wait for your definition of troll.
Click to expand...

Last week when Gatorman had 20 or 30 posts total on this board he's starts cr*pping on WinterBorn and leaningright stating that they are stupid and not worthy of being in conversations with him. For starters WB and leaningright are two of the least offensive posters on here. They don't name call and they don't get involved in petty personal crap. I, or others, may not agree with them all the time but they come across as good people. So anyhow this supposedly new poster comes on here and starts ripping into them. So to me Gatorman is just another screen name Legion created to troll the board with. And as Legion has shown he is not afraid to troll on the left or the right and that includes topics as well as people.

I am all for new posters joining this board. New blood is a (very) good thing. I do not think it a good thing though when the 'new' poster is Legion creating another account.
 
Damocles said:
You didn't read the study I see. You are clearly one of the lot that spends a lot of time talking but not much time thinking. They make for interesting posters, but aren't much for debate. As I am more for debate than argument (believe me there is a difference) I'll let you go on your merry way.

Remember what the conclusions were, the disadvantaged democrats were the least educated of all groups of voters. It solidly underlines earlier assertions.
Click to expand...

I read every word of it. It makes no mention whatsoever of disadvantaged repukes or any educational stats of them as there obviously are none. I think plenty, durno, and I have forgotten more about politics than you'll ever know. If it's your desire to discuss the plights of disadvantaged dems as compared to disadvantaged repukes I'll be glad to have that discussion with you.
 
Gatorman said:
I read every word of it. It makes no mention whatsoever of disadvantaged repukes or any educational stats of them as there obviously are none. I think plenty, durno, and I have forgotten more about politics than you'll ever know. If it's your desire to discuss the plights of disadvantaged dems as compared to disadvantaged repukes I'll be glad to have that discussion with you.
Click to expand...
It simply lists them semantically differently. Again, the study underlines an assertion from another poster earlier.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top