Native Americans sue for voting rights

Superfreak said:
For what? Every county in the state is treated the same. That said, the fact that Shannon county is so poor, they should make an exception. I wonder how geographically dispersed the 7800 voters are in that county. You would think they would be able to set up polling stations that are closer than 2.5 hour round trips. Unless this tribe is really really dispersed, I would think it feasible without much economic impact on the state.
Click to expand...

Would it kill them to have a mobile voting station?
 
lets say you have a room full of hungry children.

Some have crayons and some dont.

You annouced you have food and that all the kids have to do to get it is to give you some crayons and they will get some food.

After wards you will give them their crayons back.


Is that moral?
 
still waiting for desh to prove her claim....

why is it you always demand others prove their claims, but can't prove your own claims?
 
The right I keep encountering has NO sense of morality left.

They back things like this obvious disenfranchisement of American voters IF it benifits their party.

They care nothing about Democracy or their country.

They merely want to be in control at any cost
 
evince said:
lets say you have a room full of hungry children.

Some have crayons and some dont.

You annouced you have food and that all the kids have to do to get it is to give you some crayons and they will get some food.

After wards you will give them their crayons back.


Is that moral?
Click to expand...

worst false analogy ever.

if they want to change the way the state distributes money, contact their congress people.

again....why can't they use absentee ballots?
 
evince said:
After the suit was filed, Gant told a local news outlet that as a matter of policy, South Dakota doesn’t provide money under the federal voting act upfront, but rather reimburses districts for election expenditures upon presentation of receipts. Federal rules do not require the practice, but rather allow states to set the terms for distributing the money, according to Bryan Whitener, a spokesman for the federal Election Assistance Commission, which provides guidance on the law.
Click to expand...



Do you ever accept facts?
 
Yurt said:
worst false analogy ever.

if they want to change the way the state distributes money, contact their congress people.

again....why can't they use absentee ballots?
Click to expand...



Why cant they just have the same rights as every other voter?
 
evince said:
Do you ever accept facts?
Click to expand...

how does that prove yoru claim? prove that it is a republican policy and that they purposefully do it to disenfranchise poor voting districts.

they are not required to give any money upfront.

and again: is there a seperate right to EARLY voting? and why not use absentee ballots?

are you going to answer those questions or keep running?
 
Yurt said:
did you read the article? and yes, they have the same rights. the issue here appears to be about money and certain districts don't have enough money to have long early voting periods. according to the article, they can get reimbursed, but this district, doesn't have the funds. if you had read the article, you would see that previously they did have the same early voting period because of donations.

is there a seperate right to early voting?
Click to expand...

Yes I read the article, asshole. Did you read the same article?
These people have had their voting rights eclipsed repeatedly. They have filed 20 lawsuits. If EVERY other county gets more days to vote, then they are being discriminated against, hack.
 
he doesnt care about whats right.

I have never in all my life heard so many Americans spit on the democratic process as I have in the last 10 to 15 years.


They just dont care about freedom.
 
Yurt said:
at least according to desh's source, which she apparently didn't bother to read:



further...nothing is stopping them from absentee voting. imo, this is a non-issue.
Click to expand...

I thought you read the article, shit for brains. They clearly said they don't think their vots get counted if they mail their ballots.
 
Superfreak said:
For what? Every county in the state is treated the same. That said, the fact that Shannon county is so poor, they should make an exception. I wonder how geographically dispersed the 7800 voters are in that county. You would think they would be able to set up polling stations that are closer than 2.5 hour round trips. Unless this tribe is really really dispersed, I would think it feasible without much economic impact on the state.
Click to expand...

Every county except Shannon. Clearly the tribe is dispersed, it is freaking South Dakota.
 
Yurt said:
i already quoted that and that does not prove your claim. what is wrong with reimbursement? all districts are treated the same.

once again, desh fails to prove her claims.
Click to expand...

Nothing wrong with reimbursement if you have enough, if you don't then it doesn't work.
Once again yurt puts hackery before honesty.
 
No person who really cared about all Americans being able to vote would defend what was done here.

They dont really care
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top