I think one can find the inference in this post:
Basically saying there were "less then than there are now"... I then point out that one poster alone had a ton of threads about the TEA Party... You then try to say that because that one poster posted a huge amount of threads we should ignore that and not count it....
Spin the wheel man, but don't pretend we're all playing that game.
How is it "basically saying there were less than there are now?"' Seriously...how do you read that into it, particularly given my previous comments on this thread?
Simply amazing. It doesn't say that. At all.