Hundreds of Occupy D.C. Protesters Block Conservatives From Leaving Summit

I think one can find the inference in this post:



Basically saying there were "less then than there are now"... I then point out that one poster alone had a ton of threads about the TEA Party... You then try to say that because that one poster posted a huge amount of threads we should ignore that and not count it....

Spin the wheel man, but don't pretend we're all playing that game.

How is it "basically saying there were less than there are now?"' Seriously...how do you read that into it, particularly given my previous comments on this thread?

Simply amazing. It doesn't say that. At all.
 
How is it "basically saying there were less than there are now?"' Seriously...how do you read that into it, particularly given my previous comments on this thread?

Simply amazing. It doesn't say that. At all.

Do you think some of us are paying too much attention to the Occupy BS?
 
How is it "basically saying there were less than there are now?"' Seriously...how do you read that into it, particularly given my previous comments on this thread?

Simply amazing. It doesn't say that. At all.

Are you kidding? You dismiss it saying that back then there were less and that over time now it would "match"... calling another poster stupid for using "that measure"?

Do you honestly believe we are so stupid that your current spin is going to work? Quit it. You are embarrassing yourself.

Now that you remember that there were a crap-ton of the same type of thread about the TEA Party back in the day, just accept it and move on, stop trying to convince us you didn't say what you said.... You're going to see a lot of these threads because these people have been eating this same type of posts for years.
 
Are you kidding? You dismiss it saying that back then there were less and that over time now it would "match"... calling another poster stupid for using "that measure"?

Do you honestly believe we are so stupid that your current spin is going to work? Quit it. You are embarrassing yourself.

Now that you remember that there were a crap-ton of the same type of thread about the TEA Party back in the day, just accept it and move on, stop trying to convince us you didn't say what you said.... You're going to see a lot of these threads because these people have been eating this same type of posts for years.

You can be a bonafide idiot sometimes. My 1st response to SF was that it was basically just like the TEA threads - not more, not less. I continued along that line, and indicated that per day, it's probably about the same. I didn't "suddenly" remember anything, or say that there were "more" OWS threads per day.

What a fool on this one. You need to read better. Like I said, when you say things like "bad Bush" every day during the Valdez, it is highly suspect. You're a parisan reader.
 
Wow, this is beyond pathetic. So desperate to shift blame for this debacle that you just make shit up? Do you know what happened inside? Or are you just projecting your idiotic views onto those inside the building?

We all know you would have left her behind or worse... told her that she was too privileged and redistributed her chair to someone who was tired and wanted to sit down.

People are saying she couldn't leave the building. I'm asking if other people did and, if so, why didn't she use another exit. I didn't see a large group of people trying to leave with her. Where are the other people?

Do you know what happened inside or are you "just projecting your idiotic views"?
 
I love the apologism from Damo & SF on the retaliatory nature of the threads, as well. As in, it's okay that there are dozens of trolling threads - it's payback!

If a post is just made as payback...how much credibility does that have? It puts nothing on the merit of the movement. It's just saying "we're going to slam your movement, because you slammed ours!"

Nice reasoning...
 
People are saying she couldn't leave the building. I'm asking if other people did and, if so, why didn't she use another exit. I didn't see a large group of people trying to leave with her. Where are the other people?

Do you know what happened inside or are you "just projecting your idiotic views"?

We have many reports of what happened. People were blocked from leaving and harassed.
 
I love the apologism from Damo & SF on the retaliatory nature of the threads, as well. As in, it's okay that there are dozens of trolling threads - it's payback!

If a post is just made as payback...how much credibility does that have? It puts nothing on the merit of the movement. It's just saying "we're going to slam your movement, because you slammed ours!"

Nice reasoning...

You think there is merit in the Occupy Movement? People are being harassed, raped, drugs, lice, millions spent on security and cleanup. Explain what the merit is.
 
I love the apologism from Damo & SF on the retaliatory nature of the threads, as well. As in, it's okay that there are dozens of trolling threads - it's payback!

If a post is just made as payback...how much credibility does that have? It puts nothing on the merit of the movement. It's just saying "we're going to slam your movement, because you slammed ours!"

Nice reasoning...

I love how you always seem to equate it to "apologism". I made an observation. Quit apologizing for Obama's support of these idiots.
 
People are saying she couldn't leave the building. I'm asking if other people did and, if so, why didn't she use another exit. I didn't see a large group of people trying to leave with her. Where are the other people?

Do you know what happened inside or are you "just projecting your idiotic views"?

1) Again... they had NO right to deny her exit from the building. NONE. Quit trying to find excuses for their reprehensible action.
2) No, I don't know what happened inside, nor did I make some dumbass proclamation like 'they showed how evilz dey are'.
3) she took the route she was supposed to take due to the wheelchair, she was blocked from leaving by a bunch of petulant children throwing a fit outside. They KNEW their actions were wrong... that is why they hid their faces from the camera.
 
You are truly fucking ignorant of the facts.

1) You pretend conservatives 'vote against their interests'... that is simply fucking retarded. If anything it is the liberals that vote against their interest
2) The 1% is not a static group. It is constantly changing its make up.
3) The 1% are not at all worried by the idiotic demonstrations in this thread. NOT AT ALL.

No, my friend, it is you that is truly ignorant.

1. Wrong.
2. Doesn't change it.
3. No one is worried about this thread, but I assure you the oligarchs are getting nervous.
 
Last edited:
I love the apologism from Damo & SF on the retaliatory nature of the threads, as well. As in, it's okay that there are dozens of trolling threads - it's payback!

If a post is just made as payback...how much credibility does that have? It puts nothing on the merit of the movement. It's just saying "we're going to slam your movement, because you slammed ours!"

Nice reasoning...

I also like Damo's explanation that webbway is just mirroring Mott. You know, Mott who is not a racist? I have seen that "i'm just mirroring" bs a lot from people here. Guess what, eventually? The only thing you see when you look into the mirror is yourself, no matter how much you struggle to cloud your vision.

If I looked in the mirror and saw webbway I'd shoot myself. But damo is and always has been the King of false equivalences. I named him that years ago and he has always lived up to the title.
 
No, my friend, it is you that is truly ignorant.

1. Wrong.
2. Doens't change it.
3. No one is worried about this thread, but I assure you the oligarhs are getting nervous.

Just because it goes against YOUR desire to have the government run every aspect of your life, does not mean they are voting against their interests you dolt. You simply have a different opinion on what 'their best interests' are. You believe YOU should dictate to them what their best interests are. They disagree.

Yes, a constantly changing 1% means that it is not some super duper elite status that no one can break into or fall out of. Most people have to work hard to get there or have some talent (music, athlete, actor) that gets them there. As many have proven over time, it is just as easy to fall out of the 1% if you are bad with money, stop working hard, no longer innovative, etc...

Again... NO ONE gets worried when they see a 'protest' act like a bunch of whiny children. NO ONE. No matter how many times you say it, it won't change it. The actions depicted in that video were nothing more than a bunch of whiny children stomping their feet and throwing a fit. That doesn't scare anyone.... except of course those very same children who chose to hide their faces from the camera.
 
I also like Damo's explanation that webbway is just mirroring Mott. You know, Mott who is not a racist? I have seen that "i'm just mirroring" bs a lot from people here. Guess what, eventually? The only thing you see when you look into the mirror is yourself, no matter how much you struggle to cloud your vision.

If I looked in the mirror and saw webbway I'd shoot myself. But damo is and always has been the King of false equivalences. I named him that years ago and he has always lived up to the title.

You are a bit quick to proclaim that Mott isn't a racist. I think you are incorrect on that point. Is he as bad as Webb... absolutely not. But he does like referring to Obama as the n word (while pretending he is just using it as a reference to what 'conservatives/Republicans' think of Obama) It is beyond pathetic.
 
You are a bit quick to proclaim that Mott isn't a racist. I think you are incorrect on that point. Is he as bad as Webb... absolutely not. But he does like referring to Obama as the n word (while pretending he is just using it as a reference to what 'conservatives/Republicans' think of Obama) It is beyond pathetic.

He shouldn't write it here, but I do the same thing in real life. Many of the anti-Obama people I know are nakedly racist using that word to describe him all the time. I personally use the word when referring to him, in the way that Sean Penn recently did. FTR I do the same thing with the c word and bitch and whore, when I am describing con policy on women. I would never write that stuff here because I understand how i can be misunderstood, often willfully. But I understand where Mott is coming from with that.

And actually, I really like Mott, something that has surprised me since I came back. I used to argue with him a lot. A lot. Now he makes me laugh all the time. I must have mellowed huh? But I'm sorry, he is not hateful. IMO.
 
You should see me when I get going on you bastards after a couple of drinks SF. You'd hate me. But I'm very funny and my lib friends love it and ask for more. ;)

No one here would ever recognize me because I am very much not politically correct in person.
 
I also like Damo's explanation that webbway is just mirroring Mott. You know, Mott who is not a racist? I have seen that "i'm just mirroring" bs a lot from people here. Guess what, eventually? The only thing you see when you look into the mirror is yourself, no matter how much you struggle to cloud your vision.

If I looked in the mirror and saw webbway I'd shoot myself. But damo is and always has been the King of false equivalences. I named him that years ago and he has always lived up to the title.

:rolleyes:

If I looked in the mirror and saw webbway I'd shoot myself as well, thanks for your input. I do note how you just "missed" a huge chunk of what I said so you could pretend there was some sort of "equivalence" in the post that you wanted to be there. That's okay, I'm used to that from Darla..
 
Back
Top