Cain changes his story

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
Nice job totally avoiding the information presented that shows you've CHANGED YOUR STORY.

We going to be doing this for long? I sure hope so, because I have a feeling this could even be more entertaining than watching that fool DY tapdance around his lies on the "Bachmann Loses Georgia" thread.

how have i avoided it? i have addressed it at every level. why do you lie so much? and why are you so obsessed with my personal life?

where is the punctuation error liar?
 
i don't remember. now i remember.

is not changing your story as at the time he did not remember, that is still true and unchanged.

good lord, you lefties are bent around an axle over this.

Just hilarious...

So he DIDN'T remember...

And told everyone as much...

Then he DID remember...

And he had to CHANGE HIS STORY in order to take into account the new information...ROTFLMAO!
 
Just hilarious...

So he DIDN'T remember...

And told everyone as much...

Then he DID remember...

And he had to CHANGE HIS STORY in order to take into account the new information...ROTFLMAO!

what? so with no proof, you claim he was lying.

you libs have squat so you have to make shit up. if i said "i don't remember" and then later said "i now remember"....that is not changing my story, and ONCE AGAIN, the reason is because my original statement is still true and unchanged.

if you want to make stuff up and claim he lied, that is one thing, but without proof, you're full of crap.
 
how have i avoided it? i have addressed it at every level. why do you lie so much? and why are you so obsessed with my personal life?

where is the punctuation error liar?

Just wanting to know which version of the "facts" we're supposed to believe.

Was it when you claimed to be a meter maid?

Or when you CHANGED YOUR STORYand claimed to be a lawyer?

:rofl::lol:
 
ah the proven liar swings wildly but misses the mark as usual. i'm not surprised you couldn't answer a simple question:

tell me...how is it not remembering something and then getting refreshed....changing your story.

i doubt you will, because you always run away from hard questions after you make a fool out of yourself

Simple really...

He DIDN'T remember...

And told everyone as much...

Then he DID remember...

And he had to CHANGE HIS STORY in order to take into account the new information...ROTFLMAO!

See how that works Yurtard?
 
what? so with no proof, you claim he was lying.

you libs have squat so you have to make shit up. if i said "i don't remember" and then later said "i now remember"....that is not changing my story, and ONCE AGAIN, the reason is because my original statement is still true and unchanged.

if you want to make stuff up and claim he lied, that is one thing, but without proof, you're full of crap.

Show me where I've questioned the veracity of ANY of Cain's statements on this subject...

oh right...

You can't because this is just more diversionary YurtShit.

If I don't remember something, but then later I DO remember it and incorporate it into my story, then I am CHANGING MY STORY to accommodate the new information I just rmemebered.

Are you REALLY this stupid or are you just playing the Yurtard to derail this thread?
 
do you remember X event?

no.

days go by...now i remember

is not changing your story.

how many times do i have to explain such a simple concept to you people?
 
Show me where I've questioned the veracity of ANY of Cain's statements on this subject...

oh right...

You can't because this is just more diversionary YurtShit.

If I don't remember something, but then later I DO remember it and incorporate it into my story, then I am CHANGING MY STORY to accommodate the new information I just rmemebered.

Are you REALLY this stupid or are you just playing the Yurtard to derail this thread?

is his original claim that he didn't remember changed? no. only a dishonest hack like you would claim it.
 
is his original claim that he didn't remember changed? no. only a dishonest hack like you would claim it.

Yes...Yes it is.

FIRST he claimed he didn't remember any sexual harassment settlement.

THEN he claimed HE DID REMEMBER.
 
I dont remember.

I did not do it.

It was minor.

If we settled, it was for a small amount. (he does not remember)

This is all because Im black.

No, I wont release the woman from her confidentality agreement.

Choose the explination you want to belive...

Cain will not be your nominee, if for no other reason, because he cannot handle crisis very well, can he?
 
I dont remember.

I did not do it.

It was minor.

If we settled, it was for a small amount. (he does not remember)

This is all because Im black.

No, I wont release the woman from her confidentality agreement.

Choose the explination you want to belive...

Cain will not be your nominee, if for no other reason, because he cannot handle crisis very well, can he?

Yeah, he is lying, and there is more to this than he wants to admit. His not releasing the woman so she can speaks says it all to me.
 
Yeah, he is lying, and there is more to this than he wants to admit. His not releasing the woman so she can speaks says it all to me.

Exactly...if he's done nothing wrong, then what's he got to fear from this woman telling her side of the story?
 
Yeah, he is lying, and there is more to this than he wants to admit. His not releasing the woman so she can speaks says it all to me.

1. he has nothing to do with releasing the woman from confidentiality, that is a false statement

2. cite proof he is lying
 
Yes...Yes it is.

FIRST he claimed he didn't remember any sexual harassment settlement.

THEN he claimed HE DID REMEMBER.

exactly, the first statement is UNCHANGED. at the TIME he did not remember. then LATER he did. his original statement is UNCHANGED.

to deny that is pure hackery
 
exactly, the first statement is UNCHANGED. at the TIME he did not remember. then LATER he did. his original statement is UNCHANGED.

to deny that is pure hackery

If he didn't remember any alleged harassment...and then later he did remember it...that makes his initial statement WRONG.

So at that point he has to either CHANGE HIS STORY(I remember now) or continue telling the FIRST story(I don't remember any harassment) and deal with the ramifications when he's accused of lying.

But by all means you keep on spinning this...it's almost as much fun as messing with DY over that cow Bachmann!
 
If he didn't remember any alleged harassment...and then later he did remember it...that makes his initial statement WRONG.

So at that point he has to either CHANGE HIS STORY(I remember now) or continue telling the FIRST story(I don't remember any harassment) and deal with the ramifications when he's accused of lying.

But by all means you keep on spinning this...it's almost as much fun as messing with DY over that cow Bachmann!

my good lord. how does it make wrong? if i don't remember something right this minute, but then remember it tomorrow, how am i wrong to say right now i don't remember it? and then when i remember it tomorrow, how does that change the FACT i don't remember it right now?

go ahead, i dare you to answer those questions.
 
9-9-9???

hermancaininacj.jpg
(
 
Exactly...if he's done nothing wrong, then what's he got to fear from this woman telling her side of the story?

There are more women coming forth, it looks bad for Cain! He should have been honest about this from the get go! Politicians should realize that this type of thing doesn't stay buried, just ask Bill! When you are a man in power, it can go to your heads.
 
Back
Top