Let's get you straightened out on some things here. First of all, Conservatives don't believe in "aristocracy" they believe in the opposite, "democracy." But you have conveniently redefined "aristocracy" to mean what you need for it to mean, in order to make your invalid point. This is your first mistake. Wikipedia defines "aristocracy" as a form of government in which the "most qualified" rule. Now, what is wrong with that in principle? Shouldn't the most qualified be in charge? Well, the problem is, when all the power is controlled by only the elite few who are "qualified" then democracy fails, the will and voice of the people is silenced. No Conservative I have ever known, is in favor of silencing the will and voice of the people.
The next thing you are in error on, is the delineation between conservatives and liberals. Conservatives believe in free market capitalism, and they believe this is the best way for the most people to experience prosperity in an open democratic society. Liberals believe in Statism, and they believe the power of government should be used to ensure social justice through social engineering and wealth redistribution. NEO-Conservatives (NEOCONS) believe in global capitalism, and they believe the solution to many of the world's problems of wealth inequity can be solved with implementation of global capitalist measures, however that might be accomplished. NEO-Liberals believe in global statism, modeled after European Marxist Socialism, and they believe this will lead to equity in the world.
The problem with Liberalism and Neo-liberalism, is the principle of statism always fails and collapses. You see, government doesn't produce anything, they don't generate wealth of any kind. The money has to come from somewhere, and it comes from the producers in society. Now, this works for some small isolated countries to a certain degree, but whenever the principles are applied to large populations, the producers simply become demotivated and despair sets in, then the system totally collapses because there is no longer a source of wealth for the statist government to operate on.
Over 70 years of brainwashing by Communists and Socialist Marxists, has resulted in a large number of our population to be under the delusion that things are free, that our government can take care of our needs with some mythical unlimited pile of money it has at its disposal. The bottom line is, nothing is ever free. Anything our government provides for us, someone has to pay for. Any benefit or service our government offers, has to be funded on the backs of the producers. When unemployment begins to creep up near 10% or more, where are these producers? Well, they are at home drawing 99 weeks of unemployment benefits, further exasperating the problem. This is why statist systems ultimately collapse, and once they begin the slide down, there is no stopping it until we reach the bottom.
Okay... now, modern American liberals, they have been conditioned to believe that what they advocate and promote, is "helping" the little guy... the common man, and what they are fighting and opposing, is the conglomerate, the wealthy aristocrat, the corporate machine. Nothing could be further from the truth, because oppressing capitalism is eventually what will cause economic catastrophe, and all except the very rich, will be fighting over bread crumbs. Liberals are not "helping" the little guy, they are systematically ensuring everyone except the aristocratic elites, will suffer in the end. Conservatives believe in the power of individuals, and through the free market of ideas, and with capitalist initiatives, ANY person has the capacity for prosperity and wealth. It's a simple matter of.... is it "help" to dole out "charity" to someone, or is it "help" to empower them?
