Thats how it's done!

Superfreak said:
Then explain to us.... HOW did he re-write history? You told me it was because he called it the 'Iraq War resolution'.... that is NOT rewriting history given its previous use in history. So what is it Oncelor? WHAT are you proclaiming he re-wrote NOW?

Again, you continue to pretend that by somehow stamping your feet that it will somehow change the above. Unfortunately for you... it will not.

Now you proclaim that I am the one spinning???? ROFLMAO.... you truly are desperate. I spelled out EXACTLY where you were wrong.... and you continue to cling to the 'well, answer my unrelated question or else I am still right' excuse.

Bravo > You

Congrats
Click to expand...

It's wonderful to watch you reel.

You can't answer the question. Was the resolution, as a piece of legislation, a war resolution?

Spin, spin away. I've asked you a bunch of times. Continue to proclaim your worship of resident koolaid-guzzler bravo and ignore it; it's good company for you now.

My, how the mighty have fallen....
 
bravo said:
The resolution is what the resolution is ??

Are you defending a fellow or now.....Just spit out.....The resolution IS...."what".......

Everyone in the world knows it is "the Iraq War Resolution"......except Onceler....what about you, mouth ?

Is everyone wrong by Onceler and you.....???? The Congress?, the official name?, the Thomas Register?.., the MSM?....variious politicans?.........????....... Is it a war resolution or isn't it..?????


Now that I've pwned Onceler and Christiefan, I don't mind adding you to the list.

A simple yes or no will do.....
Click to expand...

You haven't pwned anyone. You're a lying hack, who does nothing but worship Bush.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO.... awww... how cute.... the well known hack comes to support the hack that just stepped out of the closet.

I never stated that they are the final arbiters. I showed Oncelor that Bravo's use of the term was NOT 'rewriting history' as he proclaimed. Given the FACT that it is a reference for the resolution in question that has been used numerous times in the past by those on the right, left and center.
Click to expand...

The final arbiter is the resolution itself. Was it a war resolution, or not?
 
Onceler said:
The final arbiter is the resolution itself. Was it a war resolution, or not?
Click to expand...

LMAO.... no, it is not. The matter has been resolved, your trying to change the topic doesn't change the FACT that you were WRONG in stating that Bravo was re-writing history. Clearly he was not given the FACT that many others from all political spectrums in multiple time periods had referred to it in the same manner.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO.... no, it is not. The matter has been resolved, your trying to change the topic doesn't change the FACT that you were WRONG in stating that Bravo was re-writing history. Clearly he was not given the FACT that many others from all political spectrums in multiple time periods had referred to it in the same manner.
Click to expand...

Oh - so, it wasn't a war resolution, but bravo isn't rewriting history by repeatedly saying that it was.

Got it. I take back what I said about you being smart.
 
Onceler said:
It's wonderful to watch you reel.

You can't answer the question. Was the resolution, as a piece of legislation, a war resolution?

Spin, spin away. I've asked you a bunch of times. Continue to proclaim your worship of resident koolaid-guzzler bravo and ignore it; it's good company for you now.

My, how the mighty have fallen....
Click to expand...

LMAO.... see how desperate you have become....

Funny how you continue to ignore the FACT that you were wrong. Your desperate attempt to spin away due to your embarrassment of being bested by Bravo is pathetic.

I have shown precisely why you were wrong, yet you continue to spin and try and divert the topic. You beg me to discuss your new topic when you won't even address my questions on the old one.

I would return the 'how the mighty have fallen'.... but you were never mighty.
 
Onceler said:
Oh - so, it wasn't a war resolution, but bravo isn't rewriting history by repeatedly saying that it was.

Got it. I take back what I said about you being smart.
Click to expand...

Bravo repeatedly called it the 'Iraq War resolution'.... which is PRECISELY the terminology used in the past. Thus, he cannot have 're-written history' by using the SAME FUCKING TERMINOLOGY YOU INCOMPETENT HACK.
 
Superfreak said:
Bravo repeatedly called it the 'Iraq War resolution'.... which is PRECISELY the terminology used in the past. Thus, he cannot have 're-written history' by using the SAME FUCKING TERMINOLOGY YOU INCOMPETENT HACK.
Click to expand...

Bravo = SF's hero.

He can say something again & again which SF admits is wrong, but he's still right, and the best!
 
Now... if you truly wish to be a coward and fail to admit you are wrong on that point, that is your decision.

Side note: There is a reason everyone shortened up the title to 'Iraq War resolution'.... the resolution authorized the use of force against a foreign nation.... Iraq. Hence the actual title of the resolution.

Now, I know you will next pretend that if a President is authorized to use force against another nation, that force will somehow be something other than a WAR. It is precisely what the messiah is trying to do with his descriptions of Libya. Good to see that your hackishness is fully blooming.

You CAN argue that Bush did not live up to all the pre-conditions, but the resolution itself authorized the use of force. I know... to you everyone calling it the Iraq WAR is simply a collection of 99.9999999999999% of the world 'rewriting' history. To you, the use of force against a foreign nation is what .... a picnic?

Now, do go on with your next level of spin. Tell us how the resolution for the authorization for force against a foreign nation is not a resolution for war.

To be clear.... It is NOT an official DECLARATION of war by Congress. It is the standard chicken shit approach to War that Congress now takes and has taken for the past 50 years.
 
Careful, SF - looks like you've got those panties in a bunch.

I didn't have to do much on this one, btw. You painted yourself into a corner. No, it was not a war resolution; and yes, your hero bravs keeps saying it is.

I'm not spinning; you did. I'm not wrong; you are.

It was really too easy, but I knew it would be, because your position is untenable.
 
Onceler said:
Careful, SF - looks like you've got those panties in a bunch.

I didn't have to do much on this one, btw. You painted yourself into a corner. No, it was not a war resolution; and yes, your hero bravs keeps saying it is.

I'm not spinning; you did. I'm not wrong; you are.

It was really too easy, but I knew it would be, because your position is untenable.
Click to expand...

No poor little schmuck.... you are 100% wrong. You said he rewrote history... he did not. That makes you wrong.

You are 100% spinning, because you know you are wrong.

It is laughable that you claim you are correct when you won't address any questions put forth to you and the sum of your comments of late have been pathetic attempts to proclaim my worship of bravo simply because I proved you wrong.
 
Onceler said:
Careful, SF - looks like you've got those panties in a bunch.

I didn't have to do much on this one, btw. You painted yourself into a corner. No, it was not a war resolution; and yes, your hero bravs keeps saying it is.

I'm not spinning; you did. I'm not wrong; you are.

It was really too easy, but I knew it would be, because your position is untenable.
Click to expand...

I can't help but also notice that you are now going to run away from addressing the fact that it IS indeed a resolution of War.... unless of course you can tell us how authorizing the use of force against a foreign nation is not a war resolution.

Let me guess.... 'it is just a conflict'... right??? Or will it be 'well, Bush misled the nation and therefore the resolution didn't count'???
 
Superfreak said:
I can't help but also notice that you are now going to run away from addressing the fact that it IS indeed a resolution of War.... unless of course you can tell us how authorizing the use of force against a foreign nation is not a war resolution.

Let me guess.... 'it is just a conflict'... right??? Or will it be 'well, Bush misled the nation and therefore the resolution didn't count'???
Click to expand...

It's not a war resolution, SF. You admitted as much just a few posts ago; you backtracking now that you stepped in it?
 
Superfreak said:
http://articles.cnn.com/2002-10-11/...ons-weapons-inspectors-iraq?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/feingold1.html

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/wariniraq/a/jt_resolution.htm

http://www.blueoregon.com/2007/02/revisiting_the_/

Bottom line, he is hardly the only one calling it that. The above shows a CNN article with that title, plus one written by Feingold calling it that, plus a left wing site calling it that. Thus, you can't say it is just a 'right wing' thing if someone calls it that.
Click to expand...

you really expect onceler to be honest and call his side for the same things? he loves to claim he does, but i've rarely seen it...its always only the righties that do something he disapproves of, and then when you point out his precious lefties do the same....he starts crying and stomping his feet with "they do it too"!!!!!!!

:rolleyes:
 
Onceler said:
Fuck off. The history of it is that it is NOT and never was a fucking WAR RESOLUTION.

That's 100% fact.
Click to expand...

see ^ when he is shown his lefties say the same thing...he gets all pissy...does he call them out...no, he attacks you for pointing out the truth

typical
 
Onceler said:
Knew you couldn't answer it. Why should I answer in a complete sentence, when you didn't? Fool.

Fuck CNN, and fuck bravo, and fuck you, and fuck anyone else who repeats the entirely inaccurate "war resolution." It was not a "war resolution." Period.

If you believe it was, argue that on its merits - not what a bunch of parrots have repeated after years of misinformation. It was not a war resolution. Again, that is 100% fact.
Click to expand...

LOL...MELTDOWN on aisle on 9
 
NigelTufnel said:
There's our Sunshine.

By the way, who decided that CNN and a Democratic Senator are the final arbiters of what things are? I missed that memo. The resolution is what the resolution is, regardless of what people may call it.
Click to expand...

hey obamabot and defender of all things left....your boyfriend onceler claimed it was right wing bullshit....now what do you have to say? onceler has been foaming at the mouth and proclaiming only that its right wing.....when shown the left has said the same....he is silent....and now you come to defend to him

yawn
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top