Those poor Milwaukee teachers

Let's make this equivalent.

Do we expect the Governors of the past as defacto CEO to be held responsible for the incredibly poor structure of the schools? Do we hold them responsible when they act as retailers with public money to pay back their contributors who got them elected? Do we expect any change in the "not what you know, but who you know" attitude that prevails in both politics and business?

The teachers and Administration of the schools are more equivalent to the managers and employees, not the CEOs. I expect you understand that poor performance will net you job loss in the private sector, do such failure deserve protection in the public sector? Should we just "give them more money" without some expectation of improvement?

Governors and leaders that we elect to the equivalent public-sector job as "CEO" get just as much of a pass as the CEOs you list here. Hardly anybody is speaking of the irresponsible incestuous nature of the 'negotiations' that built an untenable and expensive system that brings consistent poor results. And any suggestion of expectation of results is met with extreme resistance and claims of "Nazi" or some other nonsense.
The answer to your questions are "of course not" but in the same light would you fix the wages and benefits of Bankers to $50,000/year and then deny them the right to negotiate for wages and benefits or to charge what the market will bear for their services?
 
March 5, 2011
Fact Check: Wisconsin's baffling battle over its budget

By Factcheck.org

How High Are Teachers' Salaries?


Teachers' salaries also have become an issue in Wisconsin. One reader asked:

Q: It has been stated (I believe by [Pat] Buchanan) that the average Wisconsin teacher's salary is $100,000. Can this be true?

It's not true that the average Wisconsin teacher earns $100,000 in salary. In fact, no Wisconsin school district had an average teacher salary of $100,000 during the 2009-2010 school year. But don't blame conservative commenter Pat Buchanan for the misinformation. Buchanan, who wrote a recent op-ed on the topic for the Union Leader, was referring only to Milwaukee public schools, and he was including both salary and benefits.

Buchanan, Feb. 23: According to the MacIver Institute, the average teacher in the Milwaukee public schools earns $100,000 a year — $56,000 in pay, $44,000 in benefits — and enjoys job security.

Buchanan cited a MacIver Institute report that included a video clip of Deb Wegner, manager of financial planning for the Milwaukee Public Schools. In the video, Wegner said the average Milwaukee teacher in fiscal year 2011 will earn a total compensation of $100,005 — including $56,500 in salary. But Milwaukee is not representative of the entire state of Wisconsin — and that's where some, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, have gone wrong. On the "David Letterman Show" on Feb. 24, the Republican senator made a misleading claim when discussing the "generous" average teacher pay in Wisconsin. (Paul's comments start at 9:40 in this video.)

Paul, Feb. 24: But I guess the argument is, is you have to look at the details and say: Have we been generous with teachers in Wisconsin? The average teacher in Wisconsin is making $89,000 a year to work nine months.

There is no official calculation of the average salary of Wisconsin public school teachers, according to Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction spokesman Patrick Gasper. The National Education Association estimates the average Wisconsin teacher's salary to be $51,121. The state Department of Public Instruction only calculates average teacher salary and benefits on a district by district basis. As of fiscal year 2010, none of the school districts in Wisconsin had an average teacher salary of $100,000 (as our reader asked) or even $89,000 (the amount Paul said the average teacher in Wisconsin "is making").

-- Eugene Kiely, Lara Seligman, D'Angelo Gore, Lauren Hitt and Michael Morse

Of the 425 public school districts in Wisconsin, only one had a salary and benefits package in 2010 that exceeded $100,000; the Nicolet Unified School District average total compensation was $103,315. And only 21 school districts — fewer than 5 percent of the total — paid average total compensation that topped $89,000.

The average salary in Wisconsin schools during the 2009-10 school year ranged from $18,983 in Kenosha Unified School District to $72,499 in the Nicolet Unified School District. The median salary was the Loyola School District at $48,504. Benefits ranged from a low of $6,459 in Niagara School District to $36,567 in the Herman Consolidated School District #22. The median benefit value was $25,762 in the Adams-Friendship Area School District.

However you slice it, it's simply not true that the average Wisconsin teacher makes $100,000, or even $89,000.

http://record-eagle.com/opinion/x1422725587/Fact-Check-Wisconsins-baffling-battle-over-its-budget

Nor are the actual averages representative. The median income and benefits is probably the more representative figure.
 
Can you find even one post where people here defended those bonuses? I know I didn't, so I'm unworried about that. However I don't remember anybody defending those bonuses.
Damo you know good and well they sure as hell did on Fox News and right wing talk radio.
 
How about the rights specified by the National Labor Relations Act of 1935.

The National Labor Relations Act or Wagner Act (after its sponsor, Senator Robert F. Wagner) (Pub.L. 74-198, 49 Stat. 449, codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. § 151–169), is a 1935 United States federal law that limits the means with which employers may react to workers in the private sector who create labor unions, engage in collective bargaining, and take part in strikes and other forms of concerted activity in support of their demands. The Act does not apply to workers who are covered by the Railway Labor Act, agricultural employees, domestic employees, supervisors, federal, state or local government workers, independent contractors and some close relatives of individual employers.
 
Damo you know good and well they sure as hell did on Fox News and right wing talk radio.
Link us up. I remember them talking about people protesting at their personal residences, I don't remember anybody defending bonuses for failure. My post was based on what you said. People here didn't support that, so using it as a bludgeon on them is beating the dog for the cat's mistake.
 
The answer to your questions are "of course not" but in the same light would you fix the wages and benefits of Bankers to $50,000/year and then deny them the right to negotiate for wages and benefits or to charge what the market will bear for their services?
The vast majority of bankers have no unions negotiating for them. This is a poor analogy due to the reality that they are not socially negotiating directly with a person who they got elected with millions of dollars "donated" to their campaign. They don't get to "negotiate" with a person they already own.

The situations are not even close to equivalent.
 
I don't know what planet some of you are living on, but in most parts of the United States, $60k/year is still a good salary - well above the median household income in the US, and slightly more than I make. Also to be considered is the $40k in benefits and the fact that they get at least 8 weeks off during the summer,... not to mention that their spouse probably works, too.
 
I don't know what planet some of you are living on, but in most parts of the United States, $60k/year is still a good salary - well above the median household income in the US, and slightly more than I make. Also to be considered is the $40k in benefits and the fact that they get at least 8 weeks off during the summer,... not to mention that their spouse probably works, too.

Yeah that 8 week vacation combined with school holidays 60k salary and 40k bene's is certainly a poor working mans burden~ those poor teachers.
 
That's just the symptom and not the problem Desh. These wingnuts cannot accept that it was conservative Wall Street Bankers that threw this nation into a recession and now they would rather continue giving irresponsible tax cuts to the wealthy that further aggravate budget woes then accept small tax increases. No they would rather demonize hard working middle class professionals who had nothing to do with causing this recession and pay for the budget woes they created on the backs of working people. It's just fucking sick I tell you.

Tell us moron.... would that have happened had the POLITICIANS not repealed Glass Steagall?

Would it have happened if individuals did not take out more in loans than they could afford?

Would it have happened if mortgage companies had done their jobs and verified income levels?

Would it have happened if DC wasn't making a hard push for 'more homeowners than ever before?

also... do tell us.... who did that 'conservative' Wall Street donate more to in 2010, Reps or Dems?

You do enjoy the class warfare bullshit don't you?

Tell us.... you state that teachers have a right to get paid what the market will bare... yet you bitch and moan when the market tells the teachers it can no longer bare the current levels?

The teachers etc... are certainly not to blame for the economic downturn. But they are going to take cuts along with the rest of us.

They, like those in the private sector, have every right to go work somewhere else if they don't like the benefits being offered to them.
 
There was a cover story on one of the news sites last week about how teachers nationally are definitely "feelin' the scorn", and they don't understand it at all.

There is a weird backlash against teachers in America. People expect them to live an austere yet completely dedicated life, apparently - kind of like monks or charity workers. I have had a ton of interaction with teachers over the years, and the vast majority I have encountered work incredibly hard and are devoted to the welfare of the kids they are teaching; many often go the extra mile with kids who are having a difficult time or need extra attention.

It has become a relatively thankless profession. It's like a bizarro world, imo. Teaching should be one of our most heralded & rewarded positions...

The really sad part is that we could afford to pay the actual teachers more if we eliminated all the extra bullshit administration that is so incredibly over redundant within the public school systems.

As for your post... people don't expect teachers to live like monks. that is simply nonsense. But we are getting rather tired of idiots like Mott telling us that teachers are actually 'workers' and implying the beloved nonsense of the left that white collar workers don't really 'work'. We are also sick and tired of hearing about retirement at 50-55 for public workers. We are also sick and tired of idiots like Mott ignoring the very basic concept that public unions bargain against the tax payer.

Note... in all these threads.... not ONCE has Mott addressed the FACT that there are only two ways for benefits and salaries to be increased for public unions.....

1) Higher taxes

2) Cuts in other government departments

Instead, he whines and complains about 'rights' being taken away. The bullshit we see today is exactly why FDR didn't think collective bargaining should be allowed for government workers.
 
I don't know what planet some of you are living on, but in most parts of the United States, $60k/year is still a good salary - well above the median household income in the US, and slightly more than I make. Also to be considered is the $40k in benefits and the fact that they get at least 8 weeks off during the summer,... not to mention that their spouse probably works, too.

ahh planet of college educated. Based on your salary you likely skipped college. $60k is extreemely low for a mid-career college educated person skippy.:whoa:
 
it's obvious Ice dance never went to college, not sure about tinfool.

What's obvious on this board, with regards to college educations, is that yours was obtained from one where idiots were paid to attend...more proof that our education system is fucked up-imagine, you could be a poster boy for how rotten our education system is toppie!

Too many posters have noted your lack of a good education, so I don't make the accusation without substantiation. What makes your college shtick even more ironic is how blind to your own idiocy you are.
 
The really sad part is that we could afford to pay the actual teachers more if we eliminated all the extra bullshit administration that is so incredibly over redundant within the public school systems.

As for your post... people don't expect teachers to live like monks. that is simply nonsense. But we are getting rather tired of idiots like Mott telling us that teachers are actually 'workers' and implying the beloved nonsense of the left that white collar workers don't really 'work'. We are also sick and tired of hearing about retirement at 50-55 for public workers. We are also sick and tired of idiots like Mott ignoring the very basic concept that public unions bargain against the tax payer.

Note... in all these threads.... not ONCE has Mott addressed the FACT that there are only two ways for benefits and salaries to be increased for public unions.....

1) Higher taxes

2) Cuts in other government departments

Instead, he whines and complains about 'rights' being taken away. The bullshit we see today is exactly why FDR didn't think collective bargaining should be allowed for government workers.



SF channeling FDR. Hilarious.
 
I love that when it comes to taxes $250,000 isn't "rich," but when it comes to teachers earning a decent living 40% of that is living like a fat cat.
 
I don't know what planet some of you are living on, but in most parts of the United States, $60k/year is still a good salary - well above the median household income in the US, and slightly more than I make. Also to be considered is the $40k in benefits and the fact that they get at least 8 weeks off during the summer,... not to mention that their spouse probably works, too.
$60K a year is an extremely good salary when all the benefits are paid for by someone else....
$40k in benefits can't be ignored.....well....except by pinheads.
$60k and paying for your own medical and saving for retirement would suck, but still put you in the middle class...
You'd be in the 60% of household income group
 
Last edited:
Not that you'd know Bravo $60,000 is dog shit as a salary for a mid career college grad.
now that votec school you went to after you got the whisker burns on your back in the navy 60,000 would be high.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top