Faux caught lying to viewers once again

zappasguitar

Well-known member
Is Fox's Distortion Of Gallup Poll Premeditated Lying Or Across-The-Board Incompetence?



I'm willing to grant the fact that when you put together a daily three hour morning show like Fox & Friends, mistakes are bound to happen (labeling Elie Wiesel a "Holocaust Winner," for example).

However, incidents like this really test the limits of what can be considered an honest mistake.

As protests and legislative gridlock continue in Wisconsin regarding Gov. Scott Walker's (R) proposal to strip public employee unions of collective bargaining rights, Gallup released a poll yesterday showing that 61% of people would oppose a similar proposal in their state. If you thought Fox would either ignore the poll or claim it is inaccurate, you underestimate the network's capacity for blatant dishonesty in service of pushing GOP propaganda.

This morning, responding to Democratic strategist Robert Zimmerman saying that mainstream Republican governors "are not siding with Governor Walker," host Brian Kilmeade responded that "Gallup, a relatively mainstream poll, has a differing view." Kilmeade then completely inverted the poll results, claiming that 61 percent supported ending collective bargaining for public employee unions.

At the end of the show, Kilmeade offered a brief correction, saying that he "had it reversed" when discussing the poll.

Now, it's possible that Kilmeade's butchering of the poll results can be chalked up to his inability to read a poll or misspeaking.

However, it wasn't just Kilmeade who "had it reversed." Fox News had a graphic ready to go that repeated Kilmeade's distortion, suggesting that this misrepresentation was premeditated by the network:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102230009
 
crybaby2.jpg



fox news....waaaaaa.....fox news....waaaaa

good grief, if you libs spent a fraction of the time calling out your lefty stations, perhaps we could get all the media less biased
 
Is Fox's Distortion Of Gallup Poll Premeditated Lying Or Across-The-Board Incompetence?



I'm willing to grant the fact that when you put together a daily three hour morning show like Fox & Friends, mistakes are bound to happen (labeling Elie Wiesel a "Holocaust Winner," for example).

However, incidents like this really test the limits of what can be considered an honest mistake.

As protests and legislative gridlock continue in Wisconsin regarding Gov. Scott Walker's (R) proposal to strip public employee unions of collective bargaining rights, Gallup released a poll yesterday showing that 61% of people would oppose a similar proposal in their state. If you thought Fox would either ignore the poll or claim it is inaccurate, you underestimate the network's capacity for blatant dishonesty in service of pushing GOP propaganda.

This morning, responding to Democratic strategist Robert Zimmerman saying that mainstream Republican governors "are not siding with Governor Walker," host Brian Kilmeade responded that "Gallup, a relatively mainstream poll, has a differing view." Kilmeade then completely inverted the poll results, claiming that 61 percent supported ending collective bargaining for public employee unions.

At the end of the show, Kilmeade offered a brief correction, saying that he "had it reversed" when discussing the poll.

Now, it's possible that Kilmeade's butchering of the poll results can be chalked up to his inability to read a poll or misspeaking.

However, it wasn't just Kilmeade who "had it reversed." Fox News had a graphic ready to go that repeated Kilmeade's distortion, suggesting that this misrepresentation was premeditated by the network:

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102230009
You and mediamatters have it backwards but thats exactly what your spin wants...
The graphic is in front of Kilmeade and its wrong,...he reports what he sees....he doesn't question the graphic because he doesn't know its wrong....
media matters spin is what is bullshit.
 
You and mediamatters have it backwards but thats exactly what your spin wants...
The graphic is in front of Kilmeade and its wrong,...he reports what he sees....he doesn't question the graphic because he doesn't know its wrong....
media matters spin is what is bullshit.

So you admit he's an empty headed automaton programmed by Faux to simply regurgitate whatever "facts" scroll across his teleprompter...got it.

A pity he couldn't be bothered to check his "facts" beforehand.

Coming soon to a FauxNews Channel near you: Brian Kilmeade IS Ron Burgundy in Anchorman II!

You stay classy San Diego?
 
So you admit he's an empty headed automaton programmed by Faux to simply regurgitate whatever "facts" scroll across his teleprompter...got it.

A pity he couldn't be bothered to check his "facts" beforehand.

Coming soon to a FauxNews Channel near you: Brian Kilmeade IS Ron Burgundy in Anchorman II!

You stay classy San Diego?
Ha....hes not the only one...I've seen guys do the weather the same way....
reading from a teleprompter while on the weather map it shows a completely different thing than what is being said....

Fox has more than their share of screw ups for a major network....
 
You and mediamatters have it backwards but thats exactly what your spin wants...
The graphic is in front of Kilmeade and its wrong,...he reports what he sees....he doesn't question the graphic because he doesn't know its wrong....
media matters spin is what is bullshit.

Good point. I don't see Yapping Guitar whining about Media Matter's obvious distortion. :)
 
lol....have you ever watched Fox and Friends?......Kilmeade's lucky to get his name right....
Are you kidding? They rely on the people who live in Mom's basement watching endless Fox waiting for "gotcha" moments to post about it on Media Matters.

They'd rather pull all their nose hairs one by one with tweezers than admit to watching even a minute of Fox, let alone a morning show with all the regular morning show idiocy. I wonder if they'll talk about the cook or that they probably spent 4 minutes talking about the current events and the rest talking to a crowd of idiots outside the studio.
 
Are you kidding? They rely on the people who live in Mom's basement watching endless Fox waiting for "gotcha" moments to post about it on Media Matters.

They'd rather pull all their nose hairs one by one with tweezers than admit to watching even a minute of Fox, let alone a morning show with all the regular morning show idiocy. I wonder if they'll talk about the cook or that they probably spent 4 minutes talking about the current events and the rest talking to a crowd of idiots outside the studio.

Whenever I watch it I'm focused on the center babe's legs. *shrug*
 
Are you kidding? They rely on the people who live in Mom's basement watching endless Fox waiting for "gotcha" moments to post about it on Media Matters.

They'd rather pull all their nose hairs one by one with tweezers than admit to watching even a minute of Fox, let alone a morning show with all the regular morning show idiocy. I wonder if they'll talk about the cook or that they probably spent 4 minutes talking about the current events and the rest talking to a crowd of idiots outside the studio.

sorry Damo but I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one.....they hire one guy to watch it and post the message of the day on DU.....then they all disperse to cut and paste it on sites like this one.....if they had actually watched it they would realize they look like idiots....
 
sorry Damo but I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one.....they hire one guy to watch it and post the message of the day on DU.....then they all disperse to cut and paste it on sites like this one.....if they had actually watched it they would realize they look like idiots....

Depleted uranium?
 
How can you guys accept being misled? Fox is one of the biggest networks. There's no way they screw up a simple poll. It wasn't an honest mistake
 
If you want to understand the propaganda techniques that faux 'news' uses check this out.
http://academic.cuesta.edu/acasupp/as/404.htm

If you have a general knowledge of propaganda techniques it's easy to see them in use on Faux.

Nothing new but very effective.
Now apply it to your favorite channels, first to MSNBC, then take some time and apply it to things like the Rather Fiasco on SeeBS News. Tell me all about it, and if you are honest we'll be able to see your credibility, then we can share some conversation without all the partisan idiocy attached.

I get tired of hearing this about one particular channel when all of them use the same techniques.
 
Is Fox's Distortion Of Gallup Poll Premeditated Lying Or Across-The-Board Incompetence?



I'm willing to grant the fact that when you put together a daily three hour morning show like Fox & Friends, mistakes are bound to happen (labeling Elie Wiesel a "Holocaust Winner," for example).

However, incidents like this really test the limits of what can be considered an honest mistake.

As protests and legislative gridlock continue in Wisconsin regarding Gov. Scott Walker's (R) proposal to strip public employee unions of collective bargaining rights, Gallup released a poll yesterday showing that 61% of people would oppose a similar proposal in their state. If you thought Fox would either ignore the poll or claim it is inaccurate, you underestimate the network's capacity for blatant dishonesty in service of pushing GOP propaganda.

This morning, responding to Democratic strategist Robert Zimmerman saying that mainstream Republican governors "are not siding with Governor Walker," host Brian Kilmeade responded that "Gallup, a relatively mainstream poll, has a differing view." Kilmeade then completely inverted the poll results, claiming that 61 percent supported ending collective bargaining for public employee unions.

At the end of the show, Kilmeade offered a brief correction, saying that he "had it reversed" when discussing the poll.

Now, it's possible that Kilmeade's butchering of the poll results can be chalked up to his inability to read a poll or misspeaking.

However, it wasn't just Kilmeade who "had it reversed." Fox News had a graphic ready to go that repeated Kilmeade's distortion, suggesting that this misrepresentation was premeditated by the network:


http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102230009

????...uh yeah....in fact I just reread the OP and I missed it again....


Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure you re-read it...
 
Back
Top