52,000

How am I changing the goal posts?

The idea is that you are trying to imply that Obama is having the troops engage in clandestine activities, one way or another. We never "declared war" in Iraq to begin with, so no use hiding behind that now.

I know you'd like to hide behind something, but that ain't flying...

:palm:

obama has stated those troops are there and will engage in activities IF requested....that is NO secret onceler...

you're moving the goal posts by first claiming i was talking about war, then combat operations...i never claimed anything would be secret, ever

i claimed that it is dishonest to say there are "no" combat brigades left and again....the "advisor" is bullshit, you've been told that by a veteran on this board and the army article i linked to and the fact that two combat aviation brigades are staying...

its so simple, but you just can't admit you're wrong, so you have to spin this into some complex ordeal and completely distort what i or anyone else you don't agree with are saying....

its funny...you claim i "ignored" your post...yet you have ignored this far longer than the 5 minutes i supposedly ignored your post

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?p=697991#post697991
 
:palm:

obama has stated those troops are there and will engage in activities IF requested....that is NO secret onceler...

you're moving the goal posts by first claiming i was talking about war, then combat operations...i never claimed anything would be secret, ever

i claimed that it is dishonest to say there are "no" combat brigades left and again....the "advisor" is bullshit, you've been told that by a veteran on this board and the army article i linked to and the fact that two combat aviation brigades are staying...

its so simple, but you just can't admit you're wrong, so you have to spin this into some complex ordeal and completely distort what i or anyone else you don't agree with are saying....

its funny...you claim i "ignored" your post...yet you have ignored this far longer than the 5 minutes i supposedly ignored your post

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?p=697991#post697991

LOL

Still can't address that post.

I know why, too. Because it contradicts what you are now trying to spin. If Obama wasn't trying to do anything secretive here - if he wasn't trying to conceal combat ops - what is your point? How is he "fooling" anyone?

You've gone beyond pretzel on this one. You're like a Rubik's cube that can't solve itself.
 
Did I really have to dig this up again?

You did not respond to this one. The implication - which you're trying to sprint from now - is pretty crystal clear.

seriously, you are dumb

post 75 responded to that and your post 76 responded to my post 75

let's see if onceler can admit he's wrong that i did not respond to "this one"
 
LOL

Still can't address that post.

I know why, too. Because it contradicts what you are now trying to spin. If Obama wasn't trying to do anything secretive here - if he wasn't trying to conceal combat ops - what is your point? How is he "fooling" anyone?

You've gone beyond pretzel on this one. You're like a Rubik's cube that can't solve itself.

liar...i addressed that post in 75....wow...you've really made yourself look stupid, especially since you responded to post 75
 
seriously, you are dumb

post 75 responded to that and your post 76 responded to my post 75

let's see if onceler can admit he's wrong that i did not respond to "this one"

Post 75 did not address it, at all. All you did was the usual Yurt thing of splitting the finest hair. As I said, "war" was never really declared in Iraq anyway.

So try again. With some feeling this time.
 
Post 75 did not address it, at all. All you did was the usual Yurt thing of splitting the finest hair. As I said, "war" was never really declared in Iraq anyway.

So try again. With some feeling this time.

here we go again with the dishonest goal post moving....first it was:

You did not respond to this one

which i did....then you realize what an idiot you are and since you are incapable of admitting you're wrong...you change it to - did not address it

i did, its not my fault you don't like the answer
 
here we go again with the dishonest goal post moving....first it was:



which i did....then you realize what an idiot you are and since you are incapable of admitting you're wrong...you change it to - did not address it

i did, its not my fault you don't like the answer

Fine; you "responded." You win on that one.

The response was a dodge. And the post above is a dodge.

Do you want to try actually addressing it, or do you want to continue your little tapdance?
 
Fine; you "responded." You win on that one.

The response was a dodge. And the post above is a dodge.

Do you want to try actually addressing it, or do you want to continue your little tapdance?

awe....he gets so pissy when he has to admit his wrong...its not about winning onceler, its about YOU being honest for a change....not everything is about a win...its about honest discussion, something you are wholly inadequate at

the response was absolutely valid, and not a dodge. just because you can't formulate a rational rebuttal and can only claim i'm doing some pretzel or dodge, doesn't mean i made my point. simply claiming its "bad" without any supporting rational is weak, but so typical of you when you realize you fucked up. when all else fails onceler will simply claim you're doing a pretzel, a dodge, not addressing it....but he will never be able to explain why.
 
awe....he gets so pissy when he has to admit his wrong...its not about winning onceler, its about YOU being honest for a change....not everything is about a win...its about honest discussion, something you are wholly inadequate at

the response was absolutely valid, and not a dodge. just because you can't formulate a rational rebuttal and can only claim i'm doing some pretzel or dodge, doesn't mean i made my point. simply claiming its "bad" without any supporting rational is weak, but so typical of you when you realize you fucked up. when all else fails onceler will simply claim you're doing a pretzel, a dodge, not addressing it....but he will never be able to explain why.

Not pissy - see what happens with you when I concede a point? Thought you'd be happy, but look who really gets pissy.

Anyhoo - see my response on the other thread. I'm tired of telling you the same thing twice. You keep dodging & deflecting from your own words.

Have some courage for your convictions.
 
Not pissy - see what happens with you when I concede a point? Thought you'd be happy, but look who really gets pissy.

Anyhoo - see my response on the other thread. I'm tired of telling you the same thing twice. You keep dodging & deflecting from your own words.

Have some courage for your convictions.

let's keep it the other thread, because i'm finally getting you down to the real issues and away from your spin....

you are pissy.....

"fine"....thats like a little temper tantrum...well fine...you win....stomp feet

vs

yeah, i was wrong on that

see the difference
 
let's keep it the other thread, because i'm finally getting you down to the real issues and away from your spin....

you are pissy.....

"fine"....thats like a little temper tantrum...well fine...you win....stomp feet

vs

yeah, i was wrong on that

see the difference

If you want to continue on both threads, I'm cool with that. You were talking about the mission, and there is no way for you to run from that, no matter how much hair-splitting you do.

I gave you some good advice on the other thread. If you'd like, I can repeat it on this thread, as well. Just let me know.
 
give me a break....you can't think of any reason....

how about his "promise"...how about the political love fest he is getting from dems over this, how about being able to proclaim how quickly he ended combat operations...

good luck is exactly right and teh article i posted in the thread backs that up...YOU just can't accept reality

Does this not also imply that you are talking about what their mission will be?

You want it both ways. Obama is lying, but I'm not really talking about combat ops.

I can't imagine what it's like in your brain....
 
LOL

You always go off on the "pissy" thing, but then you're the one who sends the neg reps.

Just for future reference - I usually chuckle when I get neg reps. They don't hurt my widdle feelings.
 
why do we need 52,000 'non-combat' troops in iraq?

is not that a bit much for just training?

also, (i know this has been questioned before but i thought that i would add these for this thread) why do we need troops and material in germany and okinowa

then there is our large navy

if we are the worlds policemen, then why have we mostly ignored conflicts that are killing 100,000s of civilians in africa

Why do we need 53k for Germany?
 
LOL

You always go off on the "pissy" thing, but then you're the one who sends the neg reps.

Just for future reference - I usually chuckle when I get neg reps. They don't hurt my widdle feelings.

no you don't, they piss you off....hence why every single time i've neg repped you, you WHINE about it....

you never ever mention when i pos rep you....lol
 
You keep saying that. It's pretty weird.

How do you think they'd conceal "combat"?
Do you read the news? All they did was rename them to "advise and assist" troops instead of combat troops

Pretty simple. Only idiot liberals would fall for it.
 
Does this not also imply that you are talking about what their mission will be?

You want it both ways. Obama is lying, but I'm not really talking about combat ops.

I can't imagine what it's like in your brain....

i know you can't, thats because you're dumb
 
no you don't, they piss you off....hence why every single time i've neg repped you, you WHINE about it....

you never ever mention when i pos rep you....lol

No whining. Just being observant.

I do think it's hilarious. But, I always expect you to tell me what I'm "really" feeling, so it doesn't matter much.
 
No whining. Just being observant.

I do think it's hilarious. But, I always expect you to tell me what I'm "really" feeling, so it doesn't matter much.

lol...so you're not observant when i pos rep you....

onceler gets caught yet again looking like a total fool
 
Back
Top