Tell us you don't know what a serial killer is without saying you don't know what a serial killer is.
Who's Heritage
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
Keep building those strawmen; we know you never have anything else. lol keep defending black people getting shot every day.
You are just struggling for a talking point, because you know I'm 100% right on this.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
yes. Zionists, contrary to stereotype, are very stupid and bad at arguing.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
your SPLC Zionist organization is behind the funding of the shooting of blacks.
Grim Reaper
Chief Exit Officer (CEO)
It’s obviously just another bargain‑bin troll sock. Dammo collects them like Pokémon because the drama boosts his engagement. If there’s chaos in the thread, you can bet he’s feeding it.
No. you are an animal trying to defend another.
lol a commie whines some more, because that is all it ever has, sniveling.
You vermin have thoroughly discredited that term. That's because you rely on screaming racism for votes. Too bad that idiot nonsense no longer scares anybody but you.
And we like to eat dead babies. Don't forget about the babies.
Keep posting those inane 'thumbs down' thingies. It's pretty much your only presence here. My guess is there is a squad of mentally ill sexual deviants spamming this place, and you're Exhibit A.
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
Federal Grand Jury Indicts SPLC For Funding KKK, Other Hate Groups
A grand jury indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center on charges that bring the entire group’s mission into stark question
Federal Grand Jury Indicts SPLC For Funding KKK, Other Hate Groups
A grand jury indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center on charges that bring the entire group’s mission into stark question.
adflegal.org
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
And old S.S. (Sock puppet Stainback) is at it again.
Let's first recap; see Posts #1, 4. 6, 10 & 31 to see why and how old S.S. pointy hood got all steamed.Next, let's quickly address his latest assertion. He leaves out the FACT that the FBI changed it's description of serial killers to include gang bangers, thus increasing numbers. Funny that organized crime figures (Italian, Russian, etc. mobs) are not included in that description, but I digress.
As for his blather about mass shooters:
www.statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/?srsltid=AfmBOoraZ3eBSwf8Uf9zQCLukJzDTZhmqD093QlBJy94vOGpo6npxgeO
Apropos to that:
Hate Crimes and Gun Violence
Firearms make hate crimes more deadly, yet those convicted of misdemeanor hate crimes can still possess and purchase firearms.
www.bradyunited.org
Bottom line: surviving victims families or survivors themselves are never heard expressing relief if the guy trying to kill them were if their own race.
The OP STANDS VALID
And now we've established you aren't smart enough to know what a "commie" is.
This isn't going well for you, kiddo.
Maybe you should quit before it gets worse?
Like all the other tRumplings you don't even really know what it means.
QP!
Verified User
this case is already doomed based on the SPLC filing and will turn out to be more of a embarrassment for the DoJ then the Comey x2 and James cases have been.Federal Grand Jury Indicts SPLC For Funding KKK, Other Hate Groups
A grand jury indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center on charges that bring the entire group’s mission into stark question
Federal Grand Jury Indicts SPLC For Funding KKK, Other Hate Groups
A grand jury indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center on charges that bring the entire group’s mission into stark question.adflegal.org
QP!
Verified User
Q - Analyze the Southern Poverty Center filing addressing the charges brought against them and compare what they wroet to what was claimed by the DoJ and also what was filed in the indictment.
AI Summary:
Here’s a clear, fact-based breakdown of (1) what the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) actually argued in its court filing rebutting the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) indictment, and (2) how that contrasts with what DOJ officials were saying publicly but did not fully carry into the formal charges.
This is one of their strongest legal points, because it undercuts:
This is a moral/political framing, not a precise legal charge.
That implies something close to entrapment or conspiracy, but:
SPLC allegedly:
that weakens the fraud narrative significantly.
AI Summary:
Here’s a clear, fact-based breakdown of (1) what the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) actually argued in its court filing rebutting the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) indictment, and (2) how that contrasts with what DOJ officials were saying publicly but did not fully carry into the formal charges.
1) What the SPLC filing actually argues (core rebuttal)
In its court response and related motions, the SPLC’s rebuttal centers on a few key claims:A. “We did share intelligence with law enforcement”
- SPLC lawyers directly dispute the DOJ’s narrative that their informant program was hidden from authorities.
- They say the DOJ already knew about the program and had received intelligence from it.
- They cite specific cases where their informants helped produce arrests or prevent attacks.
This is one of their strongest legal points, because it undercuts:
- intent to defraud
- and the claim that the activity was inherently improper
B. “The public statements by DOJ are false or misleading”
- The filing asks a judge to force DOJ to correct public statements by officials.
- Specifically, it challenges statements that SPLC:
- never shared information with the FBI
- operated entirely in secret
- SPLC argues these claims are factually wrong and prejudicial.
C. “The indictment mischaracterizes standard informant practices”
- The SPLC frames its conduct as typical undercover/informant work, similar to law enforcement methods.
- Their argument: paying informants inside extremist groups is not unusual and is often necessary to gather intelligence.
D. “Donor fraud theory is flawed”
- DOJ’s case hinges on the idea that donors were deceived.
- SPLC counters:
- donors gave money to fight extremist groups, and that’s exactly what the program did
- the indictment redefines normal operational secrecy as fraud
E. “The government may have misled the grand jury”
- SPLC suggests prosecutors omitted key exculpatory facts, especially:
- cooperation with law enforcement
- They hint that the grand jury might have heard an incomplete or distorted narrative.
F. Request for court intervention
- SPLC is seeking:
- limits on DOJ public statements
- corrections to alleged false claims
- This is unusual but signals concern about jury pool contamination and reputational harm
2) What DOJ alleged publicly vs. what’s actually in the charges
Here’s where the gap becomes important.A. Public DOJ claims (broader, more aggressive framing)
Public statements by officials like Acting AG Todd Blanche included claims that:1. SPLC “funded” or “supported” extremist groups
- Public rhetoric suggested SPLC was effectively bankrolling hate groups
- Even implying it “manufactured extremism”
This is a moral/political framing, not a precise legal charge.2. SPLC did not share intelligence with law enforcement
- This was stated publicly (e.g., TV appearances)
- SPLC directly disputes this and says DOJ knows it’s false
3. SPLC was “stoking racial hatred”
- DOJ officials suggested informants were encouraged to participate in or escalate extremist activity
That implies something close to entrapment or conspiracy, but:
- That is NOT explicitly charged as such in the indictment
B. What the indictment actually charges (narrower, technical crimes)
The formal charges are much more conventional:
- Wire fraud
- False statements to a bank
- Money laundering conspiracy
SPLC allegedly:
- misled donors about how funds were used
- concealed payments via shell entities
- made false financial representations
C. Key gap: rhetoric vs. legal theory
This is the most important distinction:| DOJ Public Narrative | Actual Legal Charges |
|---|---|
| “Funding hate groups” | Fraud based on donor deception |
| “Manufacturing extremism” | No direct charge of incitement/conspiracy to promote extremism |
| “Didn’t share with FBI” | Not clearly central in indictment |
| “Stoking racial hatred” | Not charged as a standalone crime |
3) Why that gap matters legally
The SPLC’s filing is essentially exploiting this mismatch:1. Prejudicial statements argument
- If DOJ publicly alleges things not in the indictment, it can:
- bias jurors
- taint proceedings
2. Burden of proof problem for DOJ
- DOJ must prove fraud, not:
- that the program was controversial
- or morally questionable
- law enforcement knew about the program
- and it had legitimate outcomes
that weakens the fraud narrative significantly.3. Selective omission argument
- SPLC is hinting DOJ:
- highlighted damaging facts
- omitted exculpatory ones
- support motions
- undermine credibility
Bottom line
- The SPLC’s filing doesn’t just deny wrongdoing—it reframes the entire case as:
- a standard informant program
- mischaracterized as fraud
Federal Grand Jury Indicts SPLC For Funding KKK, Other Hate Groups
A grand jury indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center on charges that bring the entire group’s mission into stark question
Federal Grand Jury Indicts SPLC For Funding KKK, Other Hate Groups
A grand jury indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center on charges that bring the entire group’s mission into stark question.adflegal.org
lol and again, stop dealing fentanyl and helping the UFO's kdnap hillbillies.