Rep. Jim Jordan: The Left's Hatred Must Stop

Tobytone

Tobytone

Well-known member
Contributor
Home | Politics
Tags: jim jordan | southern poverty law center | shooting | whcd | extremists | democrats

Rep. Jim Jordan: The Left's Hatred Must Stop​



By Sam Barron | Sunday, 26 April 2026 12:30 PM


In the wake of the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said in an interview Sunday that organizations like the recently indicted Southern Poverty Law Center bear some responsibility for the shooting.

"I don't think this should be lost on anyone either, the fact that we have a third assassination attempt on President [Donald] Trump," Jordan said.

"In that same week we learn that the Southern Poverty Law Center has been paying and generating hate, the very hate they're supposed to be fighting, and they've been charged by the Justice Department."

"The left pushing the language and promoting the hate that we now learn that was going on with the Southern Poverty Law Center, I don't think that's lost on anyone either this week," Jordan said.

Jordan noted the Southern Poverty Law Center was the group that labeled organizations like Moms for Liberty and the Family Research Council as extremist hate groups.

"They were supposedly the standard, and now, they find out they were actually paying people to promote the hate that they were supposed to be fighting, to the tune of $3 million," Jordan said.

"This is the stuff that's got to stop," Jordan added.

The chair of the House Judiciary Committee said he supports robust debate and the First Amendment.

"But some of this language is just ridiculous that we see, particularly from the left," Jordan said.

But he believes it all comes back to the allegations against the Southern Poverty Law Center.


"[They were] viewed as the standard, cited by so many in the media as the standard in evaluating what groups are extremist, what groups aren't, and they're actually paying these informants to go inside these hate groups and foment more of it," Jordan said.

"That is just evil. That is just wrong. I think the irony is … they're indicted the very week that we have this third attack on President Trump," Jordan added.

Jordan said he hopes Saturday night's event makes Democrats realize they must fund the Department of Homeland Security.

"I think we could get this all done," Jordan said. "We're the party of common sense; they're the party that takes these crazy positions. It needs to happen as soon as possible."

 
Tobytone said:
Home | Politics
Tags: jim jordan | southern poverty law center | shooting | whcd | extremists | democrats

Rep. Jim Jordan: The Left's Hatred Must Stop​



By Sam Barron | Sunday, 26 April 2026 12:30 PM


In the wake of the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said in an interview Sunday that organizations like the recently indicted Southern Poverty Law Center bear some responsibility for the shooting.

"I don't think this should be lost on anyone either, the fact that we have a third assassination attempt on President [Donald] Trump," Jordan said.

"In that same week we learn that the Southern Poverty Law Center has been paying and generating hate, the very hate they're supposed to be fighting, and they've been charged by the Justice Department."

"The left pushing the language and promoting the hate that we now learn that was going on with the Southern Poverty Law Center, I don't think that's lost on anyone either this week," Jordan said.

Jordan noted the Southern Poverty Law Center was the group that labeled organizations like Moms for Liberty and the Family Research Council as extremist hate groups.

"They were supposedly the standard, and now, they find out they were actually paying people to promote the hate that they were supposed to be fighting, to the tune of $3 million," Jordan said.

"This is the stuff that's got to stop," Jordan added.

The chair of the House Judiciary Committee said he supports robust debate and the First Amendment.

"But some of this language is just ridiculous that we see, particularly from the left," Jordan said.

But he believes it all comes back to the allegations against the Southern Poverty Law Center.


"[They were] viewed as the standard, cited by so many in the media as the standard in evaluating what groups are extremist, what groups aren't, and they're actually paying these informants to go inside these hate groups and foment more of it," Jordan said.

"That is just evil. That is just wrong. I think the irony is … they're indicted the very week that we have this third attack on President Trump," Jordan added.

Jordan said he hopes Saturday night's event makes Democrats realize they must fund the Department of Homeland Security.

"I think we could get this all done," Jordan said. "We're the party of common sense; they're the party that takes these crazy positions. It needs to happen as soon as possible."

Click to expand...
Typical, even Jimmy’s Daddy calls for unity and he feels the need to milk the trajedy for all it is worth

Looks like little Jimmy is doing all he can to draw attention before he gets shelved in the little boy’s room after the midterms
 
Tobytone said:
Home | Politics
Tags: jim jordan | southern poverty law center | shooting | whcd | extremists | democrats

Rep. Jim Jordan: The Left's Hatred Must Stop​



By Sam Barron | Sunday, 26 April 2026 12:30 PM


In the wake of the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said in an interview Sunday that organizations like the recently indicted Southern Poverty Law Center bear some responsibility for the shooting.

"I don't think this should be lost on anyone either, the fact that we have a third assassination attempt on President [Donald] Trump," Jordan said.

"In that same week we learn that the Southern Poverty Law Center has been paying and generating hate, the very hate they're supposed to be fighting, and they've been charged by the Justice Department."

"The left pushing the language and promoting the hate that we now learn that was going on with the Southern Poverty Law Center, I don't think that's lost on anyone either this week," Jordan said.

Jordan noted the Southern Poverty Law Center was the group that labeled organizations like Moms for Liberty and the Family Research Council as extremist hate groups.

"They were supposedly the standard, and now, they find out they were actually paying people to promote the hate that they were supposed to be fighting, to the tune of $3 million," Jordan said.

"This is the stuff that's got to stop," Jordan added.

The chair of the House Judiciary Committee said he supports robust debate and the First Amendment.

"But some of this language is just ridiculous that we see, particularly from the left," Jordan said.

But he believes it all comes back to the allegations against the Southern Poverty Law Center.


"[They were] viewed as the standard, cited by so many in the media as the standard in evaluating what groups are extremist, what groups aren't, and they're actually paying these informants to go inside these hate groups and foment more of it," Jordan said.

"That is just evil. That is just wrong. I think the irony is … they're indicted the very week that we have this third attack on President Trump," Jordan added.

Jordan said he hopes Saturday night's event makes Democrats realize they must fund the Department of Homeland Security.

"I think we could get this all done," Jordan said. "We're the party of common sense; they're the party that takes these crazy positions. It needs to happen as soon as possible."

Click to expand...
Jordan’s quotes are accurate and the SPLC indictment is real, but the rest of the argument is political framing. There’s no evidence linking the SPLC to the shooting, no confirmation this was an assassination attempt, and no investigative finding that the left’s rhetoric caused anything. The indictment exists, the narrative built around it is Jordan’s interpretation, not established fact.

​

📌 4. Summary Table​

ClaimStatusNotes
Jordan said these thingsTrueAccurately quoted by Newsmax.
SPLC was indictedTrueConfirmed by multiple outlets.
SPLC responsible for shootingUnprovenNo evidence; political framing.
Shooting = “third assassination attempt”UnconfirmedNot established by investigators.
SPLC paid people to “foment hate”InterpretationAllegation, not proven intent.
SPLC labeled Moms for Liberty & FRCTruePublic SPLC listings.
 
Umm, Toby Boi. MAGA has been the one dishing out the hate. If you want to play that way, just look at anything you are seeing from the left as simply comeuppance. By the way, the left is not responsible for a single one of these events you're bitching about anyway. Maybe if your bloated messiah didn't try to fuck around and find out with just about everything he does, maybe there'd be no issues.
 
Such hypocrisy.

I've lost count of the # of times I've seen the right call Dems DemonRats, evil, Socialists, Communists, scum, vermin, et al.

The idea that only one side engages in hateful rhetoric is a complete & utter myth. It sucks that it's so pervasive, but the reality is that no one has the high ground here.
 
Tobytone said:
Home | Politics
Tags: jim jordan | southern poverty law center | shooting | whcd | extremists | democrats

Rep. Jim Jordan: The Left's Hatred Must Stop​



By Sam Barron | Sunday, 26 April 2026 12:30 PM


In the wake of the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said in an interview Sunday that organizations like the recently indicted Southern Poverty Law Center bear some responsibility for the shooting.

"I don't think this should be lost on anyone either, the fact that we have a third assassination attempt on President [Donald] Trump," Jordan said.

"In that same week we learn that the Southern Poverty Law Center has been paying and generating hate, the very hate they're supposed to be fighting, and they've been charged by the Justice Department."

"The left pushing the language and promoting the hate that we now learn that was going on with the Southern Poverty Law Center, I don't think that's lost on anyone either this week," Jordan said.

Jordan noted the Southern Poverty Law Center was the group that labeled organizations like Moms for Liberty and the Family Research Council as extremist hate groups.

"They were supposedly the standard, and now, they find out they were actually paying people to promote the hate that they were supposed to be fighting, to the tune of $3 million," Jordan said.

"This is the stuff that's got to stop," Jordan added.

The chair of the House Judiciary Committee said he supports robust debate and the First Amendment.

"But some of this language is just ridiculous that we see, particularly from the left," Jordan said.

But he believes it all comes back to the allegations against the Southern Poverty Law Center.


"[They were] viewed as the standard, cited by so many in the media as the standard in evaluating what groups are extremist, what groups aren't, and they're actually paying these informants to go inside these hate groups and foment more of it," Jordan said.

"That is just evil. That is just wrong. I think the irony is … they're indicted the very week that we have this third attack on President Trump," Jordan added.

Jordan said he hopes Saturday night's event makes Democrats realize they must fund the Department of Homeland Security.

"I think we could get this all done," Jordan said. "We're the party of common sense; they're the party that takes these crazy positions. It needs to happen as soon as possible."

Click to expand...
The SPLC said Trump is a hate group?
 
BartenderElite said:
Such hypocrisy.

I've lost count of the # of times I've seen the right call Dems DemonRats, evil, Socialists, Communists, scum, vermin, et al.

The idea that only one side engages in hateful rhetoric is a complete & utter myth. It sucks that it's so pervasive, but the reality is that no one has the high ground here.
Click to expand...
Demonrats? No. Communist vermin ? :unsure: Absolutely. Hey man,....if the pink pussy hat fits.........WEAR IT! :cool:
 
Tobytone said:
Home | Politics
Tags: jim jordan | southern poverty law center | shooting | whcd | extremists | democrats

Rep. Jim Jordan: The Left's Hatred Must Stop​



By Sam Barron | Sunday, 26 April 2026 12:30 PM


In the wake of the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said in an interview Sunday that organizations like the recently indicted Southern Poverty Law Center bear some responsibility for the shooting.

"I don't think this should be lost on anyone either, the fact that we have a third assassination attempt on President [Donald] Trump," Jordan said.

"In that same week we learn that the Southern Poverty Law Center has been paying and generating hate, the very hate they're supposed to be fighting, and they've been charged by the Justice Department."

"The left pushing the language and promoting the hate that we now learn that was going on with the Southern Poverty Law Center, I don't think that's lost on anyone either this week," Jordan said.

Jordan noted the Southern Poverty Law Center was the group that labeled organizations like Moms for Liberty and the Family Research Council as extremist hate groups.

"They were supposedly the standard, and now, they find out they were actually paying people to promote the hate that they were supposed to be fighting, to the tune of $3 million," Jordan said.

"This is the stuff that's got to stop," Jordan added.

The chair of the House Judiciary Committee said he supports robust debate and the First Amendment.

"But some of this language is just ridiculous that we see, particularly from the left," Jordan said.

But he believes it all comes back to the allegations against the Southern Poverty Law Center.


"[They were] viewed as the standard, cited by so many in the media as the standard in evaluating what groups are extremist, what groups aren't, and they're actually paying these informants to go inside these hate groups and foment more of it," Jordan said.

"That is just evil. That is just wrong. I think the irony is … they're indicted the very week that we have this third attack on President Trump," Jordan added.

Jordan said he hopes Saturday night's event makes Democrats realize they must fund the Department of Homeland Security.

"I think we could get this all done," Jordan said. "We're the party of common sense; they're the party that takes these crazy positions. It needs to happen as soon as possible."

Click to expand...
Jordan is a pedophile, someone should wipe the smirk from his face
 
Grim Reaper said:
Jordan’s quotes are accurate and the SPLC indictment is real, but the rest of the argument is political framing. There’s no evidence linking the SPLC to the shooting, no confirmation this was an assassination attempt, and no investigative finding that the left’s rhetoric caused anything. The indictment exists, the narrative built around it is Jordan’s interpretation, not established fact.

​

📌 4. Summary Table​

ClaimStatusNotes
Jordan said these thingsTrueAccurately quoted by Newsmax.
SPLC was indictedTrueConfirmed by multiple outlets.
SPLC responsible for shootingUnprovenNo evidence; political framing.
Shooting = “third assassination attempt”UnconfirmedNot established by investigators.
SPLC paid people to “foment hate”InterpretationAllegation, not proven intent.
SPLC labeled Moms for Liberty & FRCTruePublic SPLC listings.
Click to expand...
And, here it is again, Google AI unable to make inferences and using 100% literalism to make opinions.

The SPLC is well-known on the Left in particular. They have a business model to list, in particular, radical Rightwing and Right groups they say "Hate." They have wrongly listed more than one group and even individuals, as part of their operations. It isn't unreasonable to argue that they may have played a role in influencing this assassin. The degree to which that is true is very much debatable.

This was clearly, a "Third assassination attempt." The assassin himself has admitted as much.

The SPLC clearly paid people to foment hate. They selected the radical Rightwing groups most likely to do that and then paid them money with the hope / intention that would happen. That was in turn expected to generate more donations to the SPLC. The SPLC wasn't doing this out of some political motive. It was doing it out of greed.

The last is an example of the SPLC mislabeling groups they politically disagree with.

(required ~7 minutes 15 seconds)
 
T. A. Gardner said:
And, here it is again, Google AI unable to make inferences and using 100% literalism to make opinions.

The SPLC is well-known on the Left in particular. They have a business model to list, in particular, radical Rightwing and Right groups they say "Hate." They have wrongly listed more than one group and even individuals, as part of their operations. It isn't unreasonable to argue that they may have played a role in influencing this assassin. The degree to which that is true is very much debatable.

This was clearly, a "Third assassination attempt." The assassin himself has admitted as much.

The SPLC clearly paid people to foment hate. They selected the radical Rightwing groups most likely to do that and then paid them money with the hope / intention that would happen. That was in turn expected to generate more donations to the SPLC. The SPLC wasn't doing this out of some political motive. It was doing it out of greed.

The last is an example of the SPLC mislabeling groups they politically disagree with.

(required ~7 minutes 15 seconds)
Click to expand...
You’re treating your inferences as if they were conclusions.

Influence isn’t established. Intent isn’t established. Motive isn’t established.

If the indictment contains the wording you’re asserting, quote it. If it doesn’t, then you’re asserting what you think it implies, not what it actually says.
 
Grim Reaper said:
You’re treating your inferences as if they were conclusions.
Click to expand...

Inferences are how we, humans, come to understand a lot of things. For example, if I smell smoke, I can infer from that there's likely a fire somewhere. I don't have to see the fire to know that. I can take the smell of smoke as the conclusion there is a fire somewhere.

Google AI appears incapable of doing that sort of thing.
Grim Reaper said:
Influence isn’t established. Intent isn’t established. Motive isn’t established.
Click to expand...

Again, both can be strongly inferred from the SPLC's known actions. You are arguing, like Google AI, that only a literal 100% accurate set of facts is valid. If that were true, the jury in Trump's felony trial would have tossed out all the charges.
Grim Reaper said:
If the indictment contains the wording you’re asserting, quote it. If it doesn’t, then you’re asserting what you think it implies, not what it actually says.
Click to expand...
I have. Here it is again, for at least the third time.

 
T. A. Gardner said:
Inferences are how we, humans, come to understand a lot of things. For example, if I smell smoke, I can infer from that there's likely a fire somewhere. I don't have to see the fire to know that. I can take the smell of smoke as the conclusion there is a fire somewhere.

Google AI appears incapable of doing that sort of thing.


Again, both can be strongly inferred from the SPLC's known actions. You are arguing, like Google AI, that only a literal 100% accurate set of facts is valid. If that were true, the jury in Trump's felony trial would have tossed out all the charges.

I have. Here it is again, for at least the third time.

Click to expand...
You are doing three things:

  1. Equating “inference” with “conclusion,” which is not how evidence standards work.
  2. Using analogies (smoke/fire) to avoid quoting the indictment.
  3. Claiming he already cited evidence while still not quoting a single line.

Inferring something is not the same as establishing it.

Your smoke‑and‑fire analogy doesn’t apply here because the indictment is a written document. If the wording supports your claim, you can quote it directly.

Linking the PDF again isn’t the same as citing the specific language you say is there.
 
Grim Reaper said:
You are doing three things:

  1. Equating “inference” with “conclusion,” which is not how evidence standards work.
  2. Using analogies (smoke/fire) to avoid quoting the indictment.
  3. Claiming he already cited evidence while still not quoting a single line.

Inferring something is not the same as establishing it.

Your smoke‑and‑fire analogy doesn’t apply here because the indictment is a written document. If the wording supports your claim, you can quote it directly.

Linking the PDF again isn’t the same as citing the specific language you say is there.
Click to expand...
1e583b6e4c30c1f99b65dc611b579f0d4b2ac235889bd8f82754248727e0c26e_1.jpg


It's utterly and completely sad that you have to resort to using a crappy AI to do all your thinking for you.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
1e583b6e4c30c1f99b65dc611b579f0d4b2ac235889bd8f82754248727e0c26e_1.jpg


It's utterly and completely sad that you have to resort to using a crappy AI to do all your thinking for you.
Click to expand...
Insults don’t change the fact that you still haven’t quoted the wording you say is in the indictment. Reposting the PDF isn’t evidence, citing the specific lines that support your claim would be. Until you do that, you’re not addressing the argument you’re just avoiding it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top