Fascist…

[Into the Night]

If he is tried , he would be found not guilty... Just like the officer here... Blendon Twp. Officer Connor Grubb found not guilty for fatally shooting Ta’Kiya Young | WOSU Public Media https://share.google/wDPaTUNeVsZtbOR2Q

No trial, so the point is moot.

 

[Into the Night]

We already did this dance, gumby (posts #344 and #345). The body cam footage clearly shows Ross moving ADJACENT to the left headlight as he proceeds to MOVE IN towards the car as it begins to move. The car IS TURNING RIGHT, AWAY FROM ROSS. He jostles further left, firing 3 times.
www.instagram.com/reel/DTQT6VrAX-Q/

He is shown in other videos briskly walking away after the shooting, not so much as a pronounced limp. So you and your little brown shirted ilk can bleat the party propaganda until doomsday. But the FACTS will always be your undoing.

Attempting to run over a federal officer or any other police officer will like get you shot! Go learn what 'fact' means.

 

[Into the Night]

And when faced with irrefutable evidenced; www.instagram.com/reel/DTQT6VrAX-Q/
All you do is the usual Maga two-step: parrot the SOS in various forms, then go on some silly assed attempt at a personal attack in order to deflect your failure and folly.

So continue to circle jerk with your fellow mooks. Unfortunately for you, the rest of the world isn't buying it.

You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy.

It's not up to a vote, Libby. She tried to run over a federal officer while evading federal officers after intentionally interfering with federal officers.
ALL of these are CRIMES, Libby. Attempting to run over any federal officer or other police officer will likely get you shot!

 

[Taichiliberal]

Lie.

MAGA isn't smoke, Libby.

RQAA.

Yes, anyone who has been on this site for a long period knows YOU lie like a rug consistently.

Afraid so, gumby. Since it's inception and the reinstallation of the Orange Oaf, American standards of decency, economic/social responsibility and Constitutional adherence are at an all time low. So when jokers like you deny reality and then offer your revised version of it, you're pretty much blowing smoke.

So you're STILL incorrectly applying that tired acronym to anything you can't logically or factually (or even rationally) refute!?!? It's not going to change the FACTS that even Triple Trumpers and GOP Congressmen are voicing dissent to your feckless orange pated god. Career federal judicial members are resigning....refusing to have their names associated with illegal/unconstitutional acts. But you're insipidly stubborn and think having the last word is a "win". So be it.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Attempting to run over a federal officer or any other police officer will like get you shot! Go learn what 'fact' means.

Sorry Sqauwkie, but stubbornly repeating the party line when simple analysis of the video clearly demonstrates otherwise won't save your leadership come the mid-terms and 2028.

 

[Taichiliberal]

You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy.

It's not up to a vote, Libby. She tried to run over a federal officer while evading federal officers after intentionally interfering with federal officers.
ALL of these are CRIMES, Libby. Attempting to run over any federal officer or other police officer will likely get you shot!

Nor do you. I'm merely pointing out the FACTS that you can't logically or factually refute. Babbling a concocted nomenclature only has merit to the fool you see in the mirror.

Sorry Sqauwkie, but stubbornly repeating the party line when simple analysis of the video clearly demonstrates otherwise won't save your leadership come the mid-terms and 2028.

 

[Taichiliberal]

It also clearly shows the feet of officer in front getting hit, and firing his shots.

A lie on your part, as the NYT frame for frame clearly highlights were both legs are when Ross is firing.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, anyone who has been on this site for a long period knows YOU lie like a rug consistently.

LIF. Grow up.

Afraid so, gumby. Since it's inception and the reinstallation of the Orange Oaf, American standards of decency, economic/social responsibility and Constitutional adherence are at an all time low.

Maybe you Democrats should reconsider something other than despising the Constitution.

So when jokers like you deny reality and then offer your revised version of it, you're pretty much blowing smoke.

Inversion fallacy.

So you're STILL incorrectly applying that tired acronym to anything you can't logically or factually (or even rationally) refute!?!? It's not going to change the FACTS that even Triple Trumpers and GOP Congressmen are voicing dissent to your feckless orange pated god. Career federal judicial members are resigning....refusing to have their names associated with illegal/unconstitutional acts. But you're insipidly stubborn and think having the last word is a "win". So be it.

TDS. Delusion.

 

[Into the Night]

Sorry Sqauwkie, but stubbornly repeating the party line when simple analysis of the video clearly demonstrates otherwise won't save your leadership come the mid-terms and 2028.

The video does not show otherwise, liar.

 

[Into the Night]

Nor do you. I'm merely pointing out the FACTS that you can't logically or factually refute. Babbling a concocted nomenclature only has merit to the fool you see in the mirror.

Sorry Sqauwkie, but stubbornly repeating the party line when simple analysis of the video clearly demonstrates otherwise won't save your leadership come the mid-terms and 2028.

Go learn what 'fact' means. It does NOT mean Universal Truth.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

A lie on your part, as the NYT frame for frame clearly highlights were both legs are when Ross is firing.

And why. Ross was well within his authority to use lethal force.

 

[Teflon Don]

They had no jurisdiction or authority to extricate her from her car. Violation of her constitutional right to unreasonable search and seizure. That’s just fir starters.

Every video I’ve seen clearly shows he was not hit and, in fact, was drawing for his weapon immediately.

This fucker is toast at trial.

Now you are a constitutional lawyer? ICE is law enforcement. You think she was above the law

What is it with these white leftist women? Why are they so mentally unstable?

 

[Taichiliberal]

LIF. Grow up.

Maybe you Democrats should reconsider something other than despising the Constitution.

Inversion fallacy.

TDS. Delusion.

Squawkie, you seem to think responding to everything with cliches, projective retorts, evasive/topic switching blather and initials to phrases that don't always translate culminate in a "winning"tactic. It never has, it never will. Point for point:

1. I have no idea what LIF means, but YOU do need to grow up. Just because you can't win a debate based on facts and logic shouldn't cause your usual troll responses.

2. A silly projection by Maga mooks, since YOU cannot provide any documented, fact based evidence of that allegation .... yet you deny to death the documentation of your Cheeto Jeezus & acolytes doing just that. Pathetic.

3. Your favorite fall back phrase that you consistently misuse. Let me cure you of your willful ignorance: inversion fallacy is one assumes the absence of evidence for a claim is evidence against it. Since there is a record of posts by you over the years on this site that confirms my previous statement, you're just blowing smoke. I and others consistently provide fact based evidence during debates with you. At some point you just dismiss evidence presented and either repeat your original claim, try to divert the discussion or go on the personal attack. So your little phrase is meaningless, as is debating you once I've reduced you to parroting slogans, etc.

4. You are delusional to think you can blow smoke to cover the painfully obvious actions of this administration that defy law and Constitution.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Go learn what 'fact' means. It does NOT mean Universal Truth.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.

So now facts are not conducive to truth, in your little mind?
Fascinating.
Then how do YOU ascertain what is true or false, my silly little maga bird?
And spare us yet another version of your cobbled nomenclature, as you delusion of intelligence is the very definition of fallacy.

 

[Taichiliberal]

And why. Ross was well within his authority to use lethal force.

Because HE ran up on the driver's side, adjacent to the left headlight. His body cam shows him doing so, then trying to move is AS THE CAR IS TURNING AWAY FROM HIM, which is why both of his legs are ON THE SIDE OF THE CAR as he leans in to fire, the two more through the driver's side window.

As I previously said, you can just keep parroting the MAGA White House lie, but the video evidence tells a different story.

 

[Into the Night]

Squawkie, you seem to think responding to everything with cliches, projective retorts, evasive/topic switching blather and initials to phrases that don't always translate culminate in a "winning"tactic. It never has, it never will. Point for point:

Just pointing out your problems, Libby.

1. I have no idea what LIF means, but YOU do need to grow up.

LIF (Lame Inversion Fallacy). Grow up. You argue like a five your old.

Just because you can't win a debate based on facts and logic shouldn't cause your usual troll responses.

There are no debates on JPP. Just conversations. Since you deny logic, you are the last one to lecture ANYONE about logic.
Go learn what 'fact' means.

2. A silly projection by Maga mooks, since YOU cannot provide any documented, fact based evidence of that allegation .... yet you deny to death the documentation of your Cheeto Jeezus & acolytes doing just that. Pathetic.

What is a 'Maga mook'??
Inversion fallacy.
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

3. Your favorite fall back phrase that you consistently misuse.

No, you have TDS. I have never seen anyone recover from it. Your hate consumes you.

Let me cure you of your willful ignorance: inversion fallacy is one assumes the absence of evidence for a claim is evidence against it.

Redefinition fallacy (inversion<->negative proof).

Since there is a record of posts by you over the years on this site that confirms my previous statement, you're just blowing smoke.

Void argument fallacy/

I and others consistently provide fact based evidence during debates with you.

Go learn what 'fact' means. Buzzword fallacy. There are no debates on JPP. Just conversations.

At some point you just dismiss evidence presented

Propaganda isn't evidence.

and either repeat your original claim,

I'm not making a claim. YOU ARE.

try to divert the discussion or go on the personal attack.

Inversion fallacy.

So your little phrase is meaningless, as is debating you once I've reduced you to parroting slogans, etc.

There are no debates on JPP.

4. You are delusional to think you can blow smoke to cover the painfully obvious actions of this administration that defy law and Constitution.

Inversion fallacy.

It is DEMOCRATS rioting.
It is DEMOCRATS looting.
It is DEMOCRATS that want to censor.
It is DEMOCRATS that want to ban religions.
It is DEMOCRATS that want to convict without trial.
It is DEMOCRATS that harbor illegal aliens (a CRIME).
It is DEMOCRATS that are domestic terrorists.
It is DEMOCRATS that are trying to overthrow the United States.
It is DEMOCRATS that despise the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.
It is DEMOCRATS that blame their own problems on others.
It is DEMOCRATS that are racist and bigots.
It is DEMOCRATS supporting organized crime.
It is DEMOCRATS harboring illegal aliens.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Just pointing out your problems, Libby.

LIF (Lame Inversion Fallacy). Grow up. You argue like a five your old.

There are no debates on JPP. Just conversations. Since you deny logic, you are the last one to lecture ANYONE about logic.
Go learn what 'fact' means.


What is a 'Maga mook'??
Inversion fallacy.
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!


No, you have TDS. I have never seen anyone recover from it. Your hate consumes you.

Redefinition fallacy (inversion<->negative proof).

Void argument fallacy/

Go learn what 'fact' means. Buzzword fallacy. There are no debates on JPP. Just conversations.

Propaganda isn't evidence.

I'm not making a claim. YOU ARE.

Inversion fallacy.

There are no debates on JPP.

Inversion fallacy.

It is DEMOCRATS rioting.
It is DEMOCRATS looting.
It is DEMOCRATS that want to censor.
It is DEMOCRATS that want to ban religions.
It is DEMOCRATS that want to convict without trial.
It is DEMOCRATS that harbor illegal aliens (a CRIME).
It is DEMOCRATS that are domestic terrorists.
It is DEMOCRATS that are trying to overthrow the United States.
It is DEMOCRATS that despise the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.
It is DEMOCRATS that blame their own problems on others.
It is DEMOCRATS that are racist and bigots.
It is DEMOCRATS supporting organized crime.
It is DEMOCRATS harboring illegal aliens.

1. No, you're just stupidly doing EXACTLY as I said you would.
2. Ahh, so your limited mental capacity finally came up with a new version of the same old default phrase that you erroneously use every blessed time you can't logically or factually disprove what others post. Must be that vaunted "self teaching" at work.
3. It's fascinating how you proudly declare your personal revision of things like dictionaries and such in spite of historical fact-based evidence to the contrary. Remember Squawkie, YOU (or was it some other idiot you picked up the gauntlet for) were the one who denied the process of learning by denying why and how a dictionary exists. Easy enough to check the chronology of the posts to verify. And as any rational adult withe a G.E.D. or better can read, you also have penchant for projection.
4. More projection. But I do have TDS (Tired of Dumb Shits).
5. Per Merriam-Webster dictionary: Mook - a foolish, insignificant, or contemptible person. That essentially describes the "base" of Dump's "Make America Great Again" republican/conservative supporters. Then you do your usual ill placed default dodge followed with more projection.
6 - 8. See #2.
9. See, YOU have to PROVE your allegation/assertion. But proof requires FACTS and the logic derived from them. YOU prefer your own personal revision of facts and definitions of words as they apply to actions or situations. So essentially an educated adult discussion/debate with you is not possible.
10. The chronology of the posts makes you a liar to any rational, objective adult reading this exchange. See #9 as to why that is.
11. See #2.
12. See #3.
13. See #2, compounded by a massive display of projection for a MAGA mook (see #5).

So you're back on the ignore list after today. (see #9). Adios for now, Squawkie.

 

[Into the Night]

1. No, you're just stupidly doing EXACTLY as I said you would.

And what is that?

2. Ahh, so your limited mental capacity finally came up with a new version of the same old default phrase that you erroneously use every blessed time you can't logically or factually disprove what others post. Must be that vaunted "self teaching" at work.

Void argument fallacy.

3. It's fascinating how you proudly declare your personal revision of things like dictionaries

I don't revise dictionaries. I never claimed I did.

and such in spite of historical fact-based evidence to the contrary.

What history are you speaking of? Go learn what 'fact' means.

Remember Squawkie, YOU (or was it some other idiot you picked up the gauntlet for) were the one who denied the process of learning by denying why and how a dictionary exists. Easy enough to check the chronology of the posts to verify. And as any rational adult withe a G.E.D. or better can read, you also have penchant for projection.

The purpose of a dictionary is to standardize spelling and pronunciation. It has no other purpose. No dictionary defines any word.

4. More projection. But I do have TDS (Tired of Dumb Shits).

Fallacy fallacy. You cannot blame your problems on me or anybody else.

5. Per Merriam-Webster dictionary: Mook - a foolish, insignificant, or contemptible person. That essentially describes the "base" of Dump's "Make America Great Again" republican/conservative supporters. Then you do your usual ill placed default dodge followed with more projection.

No dictionary defines any word. Fallacy fallacy.

9. See, YOU have to PROVE your allegation/assertion.

Trying to deny what you are won't work.

But proof requires FACTS and the logic derived from them.

Go learn what 'fact' means. Go learn what 'proof'' means. Buzzword fallacies. Trying to deny what you are won't work.

YOU prefer your own personal revision of facts and definitions of words as they apply to actions or situations.

I have not defined any word. You are just ignoring them again. Buzzword fallacies.

So essentially an educated adult discussion/debate with you is not possible.

Mantra 1c. Lame.

So you're back on the ignore list after today. (see #9). Adios for now, Squawkie.

YAFI

 

[domer76]

Now you are a constitutional lawyer? ICE is law enforcement. You think she was above the law

What is it with these white leftist women? Why are they so mentally unstable?

One more time, bitch. They are not law enforcement and have no authority to enforce state and local laws and ordinances.

Stupid fucking MAGAT moron.

 

[Jarod]

Like don't go through that window in the Capitol?



Hitting an ICE agent with your car is an attack on his life and he has the right to defend his life.

@TOP
@FastLane
@Tobytone
@Yakuda

Will reluctantly admit the Jarod is trolling again.

Do something stupid, pay the price.