Dr. Williams? Which Williams is this?
The Tea Party Did the Right Thing
- Thread starter Mott the Hoople
- Start date
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
LOLZ at stragitigists.
THat is what it was set up to look like, in reality it is a shell established by the Republican party because of the damage that was caused to the brand by the Bush Administration.
Its like when Baptists establish "non-demonational" churches because they found out that younger people were turned off by the name "Baptist". Same old shit, different name.
Conjecture based in projecting. Do you remember when they said they were "professional" protesters? Then links suddenly were available actually showing that the people hiring people to protest weren't right-wing... Do you remember it?
Your Honor I Move to dismiss, based on the lack of anything other than conjecture and baseless "hearsay" evidence against my client.
This should make you happy. This admission of WB's now gives tacit approval to paint with said broad brush when someone from the Looney Left does/says something under the mantle of the Democrats and proclaim ALL democrats are alike.
This is cause for celebration. After all; WB has said it so.
No, I do not know what you are talking about.
I am sure there are genuine elements of the Tea Party, but they should change there name and call themselves something else. The lemings who are following the TEA party movement are being used by the Republican party, pretending to be something different than it is.
Pretending they are something different than the Bush Administration.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO.... really... so to you he did that when...
1) he refused to look at the PEER reviewed paper and tried dismissing it by saying 'that university is laughable' or was it when he stated 'not enough scientists have heard of this guy'? Which was it that made you think 'wow, Cypress really refuted that paper'?
2) or was it when he refused to answer simple questions like 'WHO was on the review panels', 'WHO initiated the reviews', 'Why do you say the debate is over when your own unimpeachable source says the debate is not over'? Was it one of those that made you think that Cypress somehow gave me a beating?
As I stated, Cypress is a parrot. He is incapable of discussion. He posts his government/government funded links and proclaims the debate is over.... like a good little parrot.
Just a repeat of the same conjecture. You don't even provide circumstantial evidence, let alone any solid evidence. You could at least provide some hearsay, but instead you just use the argument by repetition fallacy. The reality is there is no "The" TEA Party... because there is no political party that is called that. One could be made, but at this moment doesn't exist in any way shape or form.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
actually, i highly doubt many tea party folks would approve of bush's spending
Mark William's is the raido host who was the speaker for the TEA Party Express. He wrote a satirical response about the NAACP's accusation of racism. He attempted to show hypocrisy...he failed to do so and instead gave fodder to the critics, but it was still his right to try.
His stereotypical portrayal was in bad taste, but does not "prove" racism in the TEA party. My point is that the TEA party really is a loose and non conforming group of individuals...it is not a national organization per se. It has no single representative structure...but many. To create this idea that the ranks should/can be policed is absurd at this point.
NOTE: he, William's, had already tendered his resignation at the end of June before writing his satire.
It is a less solidified group than the Republicans or Democrats, but the "brand" was whiped together by Republican stragitists who knew what they were doing. They may have lost some measure of control in some areas, but they will get it back. Its akin to the way Disney opened Touchtone pictures for movies that had R ratings.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Roy Moore spoke at a Tea Party event in TN, another event in AL, and (I believe) another event in GA. So, while there may be no central "they", Moore is being welcomed by several of the groups.
And the fact that none of the separate Tea Party entities (that I have seen) condemned Moore as anti- US Constitution and anti-freedom, speaks on some level.
Exactly, but they voted for him, and this is an effort to keep them in the fold for the next Republican canidate who will also be a big spender.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
give me a break.... he does not draw any of his own conclusions... hence every time someone asks him a question he plays it off like the question is somehow not legitimate.
he gets insulted because like the cowardly little parrot that he is, he continually posts threads on the subject and then runs from any and all questions that might detract from his religious beliefs. Anytime someone posts something that refutes what he is saying he either:
1) ignores it completely
2) tries to dismiss it as 'right wing'
3) Calls a University climatology department 'laughable'
4) states the scientist 'isn't known by a large enough group of other scientists'
He asks for peer reviewed papers and upon receiving one he:
1) Refuses to read it
2) tries desperately to change the topic by posting yet another link to his beloved masters websites.
If you think he is willing to discuss the topic and actually input his OWN thoughts...
Ask him....
1) Why HE proclaims the debate is over when Jones says it is not?
2) Who made up the review boards that supposedly exonerated East Anglia and Mann at Penn State?
3) Why if Man is the primary cause of global warming did Jones state there has been no significant warming in the past 15 years?
4) Why he doesn't hold the same standards to each NAS he touts that he does to the material that he asks opponents to provide?
Or you could ask him to address the FACTS that Good Luck pointed out to him that he also tries desperately to ignore.
simple questions... ones that he should easily be able to answer if he is truly drawing his own conclusions
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
how do you make this argument in light of a Democrat who spent more in one year than Bush did in eight?.....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
pssssssssssssst....the bulk of the spending came at the end of his term and he was no longer running for office....most members of the tea party call out BOTH repubs and dems for spending....
pretty simple stuff, but nigel as usual is talking out his ass
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
to be clear... what anti-US Constitution and anti-freedom items are you referring to?
Is there something besides his not wanting to remove the ten commandments?
W
WinterBorn
Guest
This should make you happy. This admission of WB's now gives tacit approval to paint with said broad brush when someone from the Looney Left does/says something under the mantle of the Democrats and proclaim ALL democrats are alike.
This is cause for celebration. After all; WB has said it so.
Talk about taking a point and going crazy with it.
Besides, hasn't the term "libtard" been used to paint a broad stroke over everything even remotely connected with any liberal cause?
If my statement gave "tacit approval", it was an unnecessary approval because it was being done long before I made the comment.