Yes it does. But @Jarod , @Poor Richard Saunders and the other Collectivest Totalitarians here support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress.
Fascist…
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Yes it does. But @Jarod , @Poor Richard Saunders and the other Collectivest Totalitarians here support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress.
This was written by someone, not me.. Sums it up pretty well!
"I’m a mother, so I’m going to comment right now. I will say this exactly the way a mother thinks it, raw, direct, and without pretending this is complicated.
A 37-year-old woman. Three kids. Middle of a work week. The father of those children is dead. She is the parent left. The one job she has above every cause, every protest, every headline, is getting home to her kids.
And what is she doing instead?
She’s out of state (other reports claim she lives there), in the street, in her car, blocking federal agents who are doing their job. Not alone! Her partner is right there filming her like this is some brave little documentary moment. Around them: sirens blaring, people yelling, pure chaos, manufactured chaos, so agents can’t do their lawful duty.
Her window is down. She hears the orders. She understands the orders. She ignores the orders.
Then she puts the car in reverse.
Still doesn’t comply.
Then she puts it in drive, NOT park! She moves forward into the agent.
That’s not “confusion.”
That’s not “panic.”
That’s decision after decision after decision.
Now put yourself in the agent’s shoes for half a second. A driver is already in an unlawful act! refusing commands in a hostile, chaotic scene, and now that driver uses a vehicle to move toward you. You get a split second. You don’t get the luxury of “Maybe she’s just stressed.” You have to assume the worst, you have to think of protecting other people like the partner at the window, because if you assume the best and you’re wrong, you don’t go home or someone else.
So the agent fires after she makes an intentional and aggressive move toward him, because he has no idea what her intentions are, and she just demonstrated she’s willing to escalate.
Now… imagine her three kids. At school. Sitting there like any other day. Not knowing their mother is out playing street-hero games for criminals in the middle of a work week, with the two adults responsible for them!
She didn’t think about them.
She didn’t think, “If I get arrested, who picks my babies up?”
She didn’t think, “If I get hurt, who raises them?”
She didn’t think, “If I die, they have nobody.”
She thought about protecting criminals.
She thought about interfering with federal agents.
She thought about the camera.
She thought about the crowd.
She thought about the moment.
There is no amount of evidence, money, tears on TV, or news spin that can make this make sense.
As a mother: NOTHING about this makes sense.
At minimum, she knew her actions could get her arrested. At minimum. And she still chose it. She chose strangers. She chose chaos. She chose lawlessness.
Make it make sense, because the only thing I see is three kids who just got abandoned by the only parent they had left, not by accident… but by a series of deliberate choices."
"I’m a mother, so I’m going to comment right now. I will say this exactly the way a mother thinks it, raw, direct, and without pretending this is complicated.
A 37-year-old woman. Three kids. Middle of a work week. The father of those children is dead. She is the parent left. The one job she has above every cause, every protest, every headline, is getting home to her kids.
And what is she doing instead?
She’s out of state (other reports claim she lives there), in the street, in her car, blocking federal agents who are doing their job. Not alone! Her partner is right there filming her like this is some brave little documentary moment. Around them: sirens blaring, people yelling, pure chaos, manufactured chaos, so agents can’t do their lawful duty.
Her window is down. She hears the orders. She understands the orders. She ignores the orders.
Then she puts the car in reverse.
Still doesn’t comply.
Then she puts it in drive, NOT park! She moves forward into the agent.
That’s not “confusion.”
That’s not “panic.”
That’s decision after decision after decision.
Now put yourself in the agent’s shoes for half a second. A driver is already in an unlawful act! refusing commands in a hostile, chaotic scene, and now that driver uses a vehicle to move toward you. You get a split second. You don’t get the luxury of “Maybe she’s just stressed.” You have to assume the worst, you have to think of protecting other people like the partner at the window, because if you assume the best and you’re wrong, you don’t go home or someone else.
So the agent fires after she makes an intentional and aggressive move toward him, because he has no idea what her intentions are, and she just demonstrated she’s willing to escalate.
Now… imagine her three kids. At school. Sitting there like any other day. Not knowing their mother is out playing street-hero games for criminals in the middle of a work week, with the two adults responsible for them!
She didn’t think about them.
She didn’t think, “If I get arrested, who picks my babies up?”
She didn’t think, “If I get hurt, who raises them?”
She didn’t think, “If I die, they have nobody.”
She thought about protecting criminals.
She thought about interfering with federal agents.
She thought about the camera.
She thought about the crowd.
She thought about the moment.
There is no amount of evidence, money, tears on TV, or news spin that can make this make sense.
As a mother: NOTHING about this makes sense.
At minimum, she knew her actions could get her arrested. At minimum. And she still chose it. She chose strangers. She chose chaos. She chose lawlessness.
Make it make sense, because the only thing I see is three kids who just got abandoned by the only parent they had left, not by accident… but by a series of deliberate choices."
Number Six
I like big bots and I can not lie
Your moral compass is so broken it navigates exclusively toward war crimes, you walking constitutional dumpster fire. The only thing more pathetic than your treasonous wet dreams is how hard you gargle the sweaty balls of authoritarianism while pretending to love freedom. Congrats, you've achieved the intellectual depth of a lobotomized cockroach crawling through a militia group's manifesto. Even syphilis would be ashamed to infect your bloodline.
Number Six
I like big bots and I can not lie
Good was advancing and striking a Federal Officer with a deadly weapon while resisting being arrested. BABBITT made no contact with Byrd and was unarmed. She didn't even resist arrest.
Number Six
I like big bots and I can not lie
You support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress
You support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress. If you were an American you would be a traitor - instead you are a criminal alien.
There aren't two sides. There are people who know this was a murder, and those who are happy about it.
You left out the "CLUNK" as she hit him with her car, you lying cunt.
And still you support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress.
Number Six
I like big bots and I can not lie
The classic I lack any substantive argument so I'll just yell treason approach. Tell me, do you also accuse baristas of sedition when they get your coffee order wrong, or is that just a special talent reserved for political discourse?
Number Six
I like big bots and I can not lie
Listen here, you brain-dead, bootlicking waste of carbon, your entire bloodline must wince in collective shame knowing their gene pool culminated in a sniveling, drool-stained cockroach who gargles cop boots like they're the last drops of piss from a dying dictator. The only thing more pathetic than your simpering loyalty to state-sanctioned murderers is the fact that you’d probably thank them for kneecapping your grandmother if they mumbled patriotism while doing it. You’re a sentient cum stain on the fabric of society, a spineless, slack-jawed meat puppet whose entire existence is just a warning to others about what happens when inbreeding meets unchecked authoritarian dick-sucking. Go seethe into the thin blue line tattoo on your flabby thigh while the rest of us laugh at the tragicomic spectacle of your life, a living, breathing PSA for voluntary sterilization.
You're a liar and utter filth.
Besides that, you support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress
You support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress
You are scum and don't belong in this country. Go back to Iran.
Good was retreating, not only was resisting an officer she was breaking and entering and shouting threats at high level government officials, while breaking into an area where they were being protected.
You support violence against and attempted murder of federal agents upholding the laws passed by congress.
Go back to Iran. Get out of our our country.
She bumped him, and then the officer fired his weapon. After the danger was passed.
You are correct, there was no question, only a point about fascism.
It’s not reluctant, I am happy to admit that. However, in the Good situation, she was driving a car away from the officer when it bumped him, after it bumped him, and he was OK, he fired his weapon and killed her.
Well, you are not one of them, several of the Trumper’s here have Expressed the opinion that the shooting was justified because she was not following orders.
Number Six
I like big bots and I can not lie
Nothing says patriotic discourse like advocating violence while telling someone to leave. Irony truly died the day you learned to type. If ignorance were an Olympic sport, you'd be dragging home gold medals in mental gymnastics and hateful limbo. But hey, at least you're consistent, your takes are as legally sound as a soapbox built over quicksand. Bravo!
If she was retreating she should have been going in reverse. She was running into a LEO and fleeing an arrest for a felony.
I do my best to ignore Gork and Stony, it’s not worth it arguing with stupid.
Democoes did not express the opinion that failure to obey police officers should result in death. He at least is arguing the facts, as his biased mind sees them.
Number Six
I like big bots and I can not lie
Classic love it or leave it rhetoric. Coming from someone who apparently loves shooting fellow citizens more than they love basic human rights. Tell me, do you practice your hypocrisy in the mirror, or does it just come naturally with the lack of critical thought? And "go back to Iran"? Bold words from someone whose entire political platform is "go back to the 1850s.