If I ignore you will it stop you from spamming?
Hegseth issues an illegal order.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Jake Starkey
Verified User
irrelevant and irresponsible
Maybe his mommy will take him to look at Christmas lights.
Terrorists aren’t murdered, they are killed.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
I don't spam.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Who did they terrorize?
Like little Ralphy.
Tbird19482
Verified User
And they are covered under the Geneva Convention.
And IF Argentina would have done this to one of our boats you can bet the MAGAS on here would be screaming about it.
And it still could happen.
Tbird19482
Verified User
NO in this case they WERE MURDERED.
And it IS still against the Geneva Convention.
The parent of the kids they killed with drugs.
Terrorists themselves generally don't receive legal protections for their actions
.as terrorism is a crime, but individuals accused or detained for terrorism do have some due process rights, like habeas corpus, and governments implement "Protect" strategies to defend the public from terrorists, rather than protecting terrorists. International law and national policies focus on preventing, pursuing, and prosecuting terrorists, while also securing populations against attacks.
No terrorists were detained, They were killed.
.as terrorism is a crime, but individuals accused or detained for terrorism do have some due process rights, like habeas corpus, and governments implement "Protect" strategies to defend the public from terrorists, rather than protecting terrorists. International law and national policies focus on preventing, pursuing, and prosecuting terrorists, while also securing populations against attacks.
No terrorists were detained, They were killed.
Last edited:
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
They were not forced to take drugs.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
No, I just posted about the GC concerning terrorists.
In general, terrorists are not covered by the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) unless they are specifically subject to U.S. military jurisdiction (such as active duty service members) or are tried by a military commission during wartime. The UCMJ primarily applies to personnel within the U.S. armed forces.
No, terrorists are generally not directly covered as protected persons under the Geneva Conventions because they aren't part of recognized state armed forces or civilians not participating in hostilities, often falling under categories like "unlawful combatants" or "unprivileged belligerents," meaning they don't automatically get POW status.
You don't know that. Some may have been forced.
No that is a response to your lie.That's spamming.
Look at these far loons, twisting themselves into pretzels defending Narco-terrorists who kill our citizens, our children.
Sin verguenzas, todas.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Nobody's defending them.