Question: What happened to the Epstein files?

The Epstein files seem to have nearly vanished as a topic in the news, and here, just a week or so after their release. Now everything is "Trump is issuing illegal orders to the military!" hysteria on the Left. What happened? I thought the Epstein files were going to 'finish Trump' and put him in prison for pedophilia or something.

But now? It's "Trump is issuing illegal orders to the military!" I guess the Epstein files turned out to be a nothing burger for the Left, so they've moved on to the next shiny object...
Why would he do that? It was much more fun to watch you idiots tighten your own noose week after week until you actually asked Trump to kick the stool out from under your feet and complete the job, and he did. Guess what? It hasn't even started yet, lol.

Let's see, they'll be released just before Christmas. I wonder who's been naughty and who's been nice.
 
Why would he do that? It was much more fun to watch you idiots tighten your own noose week after week until you actually asked Trump to kick the stool out from under your feet and complete the job, and he did. Guess what? It hasn't even started yet, lol.

Let's see, they'll be released just before Christmas. I wonder who's been naughty and who's been nice.
I'm figuring the biggest loser when all the files are public will be Bill Clinton.
 
Here's how we will play this:

1. You will list all the European kings in existence in 1773 (without omitting any).
2. You will explain how each one did not have the power to grant land.
3. I will rebut.
ROFLMAO.

Nope. Either support your assertion or be content to have your argument summarily dismissed. (IBDaMann)
 
Nope. Your stupidity knows no bounds.

The "Epstein file" hoax was the hoax. How is it that you need this explained to you?
The FBI has an Epstein file that contains all the information from their investigation. Something that exists is not a hoax.
Too funny! Did you just say that my stupidity isn't very deep? Way too funny!
Your stupidity is just so broad it doesn't appear deep to you.
 
Too funny! It was your assertion. If you are fine leaving your assertion unsupported and summarily dismissed, then so am I.
I already mentioned George III who is the only monarch the Monarchists in the colonies were concerned about.

But the reality is you are supporting the original claim so feel free to support that claim any time or have your support of that claim dismissed with that claim.
 
This has been rehashed many times here on JPP. Let's jump right to the bottom of this rabbit-hole:

Why are you demanding that child porn be released to the public?
What child porn will be released? All victims are to be redacted and their identities not released. Do you understand that a child is a victim?
 
I already mentioned George III who is the only monarch the Monarchists in the colonies were concerned about.
Great. That's not what we were discussing. Dial it back.

But the reality is you are supporting the original claim ...
The original claim was yours, i.e. that European kings of 1733 could not grant land. That was a stupid claim, but I am happy to let you support it. Otherwise, your comments that I rebutted remain rebutted.
 
Great. That's not what we were discussing. Dial it back.


The original claim was yours, i.e. that European kings of 1733 could not grant land. That was a stupid claim, but I am happy to let you support it. Otherwise, your comments that I rebutted remain rebutted.
That wasn't my claim at all. But thanks for the laugh. Your strawman was quite hilarious.
 
Back
Top