Hegseth issues an illegal order.

[Truth Detector]

Agreed. Same for Anwar Al-Awlaki. A known terrorist with videos advocating killing Americans is not the same as a survivor clinging to a boat in the ocean.

Because you say so. But alas, you're a mentally unstable halfwit with severe TDS.

Why not pick him or her up and interrogate them? Recover any drugs in the wreckage and show the world that the action was justified?

To what purpose?

 

[Truth Detector]

All MAGAt cracker retards have is talk, mostly lies and false accusations. Sad.

 

[AProudLefty]

Because you say so. But alas, you're a mentally unstable halfwit with severe TDS.



To what purpose?

asking dumb questions.

 

[Truth Detector]

Where did this circumstantial evidence come from? Citation to Rubio saying it?

Says a brainless douchebag who is trying to argue they weren't carrying drugs.

This is why you cannot argue with lying leftist morons.

 

[Truth Detector]

Nope. They're defending the Constitution and the laws. Killing survivors is a war crime.

Really? What laws? How is it a war crime? You cannot have a war crime without a war dipshit.

Cite what laws are being broken.

 

[Truth Detector]

Innocent until proven guilty.

So, Obama is a war criminal?

That is not the question I asked. Run!

You never answer any questions you are asked. RUN little brainless man.

 

[Truth Detector]

Agreed. It's just further proof that all MAGAt cracker retards are against the Constitution and the rule of law.

 

[Truth Detector]

It's getting tiresome.

What is tiresome is your brainless stupidity.

 

[Truth Detector]

Sure. Some guy in Timbuktu phoned it in Washington Post.

So, the WAPO quoted some credible witnesses? Please name the sources if you can find the link.

Yeah that's it. Some random callers called it in.

See above shit-for-brains.

 

[Truth Detector]

A theory on why Trump pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández:

‘Trump is now doing their bidding’: Journalists say they know why trafficker got pardon

President Donald Trump has been hammered over his recent pardon of a convicted Honduran drug trafficker, with the president being pressed for an explanation as his administration escalates military pressure on Venezuela over alleged narcotics trafficking. But on Sunday, two journalists said...

www.rawstory.com

While Republican lawmakers have struggled to reconcile Trump’s war on drugs with his pardoning of a major drug trafficker, journalist Pedro Gonzalez said recently that he believes he’s figured out the reason.

“There’s a 90% chance Trump wants to pardon Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras, who was convicted for his role in a major drug trafficking enterprise, because he is connected to people like Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen and the rest of the tech bro morons,” wrote Chronicles Magazine correspondent Gonzalez in a recent social media post on X.

Thiel and Andreessen – two billionaire tech industry giants that hold major influence over the Trump administration – are both strong backers of Honduran Zones for Employment and Economic Development, or ZEDEs, a proposal for a type of autonomous city or area with its own administrative and political system operating on libertarian principles.

 

[Truth Detector]

Is that how you cope? By repeating the same post?

More stupid strawmen. I don't think you can post without them and lying your dumb ass off.

 

[AProudLefty]

So, the WAPO quoted some credible witnesses? Please name the sources if you can find the link.



See above shit-for-brains.

Prove that they made up the sources. After all it's your game.

 

[Truth Detector]

They know and vet their sources.

They do? Name their sources then. I am sure you can find a link and prove your brainless lie filled statement.

 

[AProudLefty]

They do? Name their sources then. I am sure you can find a link and prove your brainless lie filled statement.

How am I lying? Why accuse me of Washington Post's reporting?

 

[Truth Detector]

Prove that they made up the sources. After all it's your game.

This is why one cannot argue with lying leftist morons. You made a stupid statement and then when asked to back it up, go into full crying and deflecting mode.

I didn't say they made them up dumbass, I asked you to provide these supposed sources you claim, in a vacuum of truth or any facts, they vetted.

 

[AProudLefty]

This is why one cannot argue with lying leftist morons. You made a stupid statement and then when asked to back it up, go into full crying and deflecting mode.

I didn't say they made them up dumbass, I asked you to provide these supposed sources you claim, in a vacuum of truth or any facts, they vetted.

What statement? I didn't do the reporting, using several people as source.

 

[Truth Detector]

How am I lying? Why accuse me of Washington Post's reporting?

You're arguing that the sources are impeccable and valid. That was a lie and you cannot provide who these sources are or were.

Your position is that a war crime has been committed. When asked what laws you are citing to make such an unhinged moronic claim, you ignore it, flail or deflect.

When asked if Obama committed a war crime based on your moronic arguments, you construct a strawman argument.

So where are these so-called "credible sources" and who are they? What is the criminal statute you claim has been broken?

 

[Truth Detector]

What statement? I didn't do the reporting, using several people as source.

Who are these sources? You made the claim, didn't you? Why all the flailing and obtuseness?

 

[AProudLefty]

You're arguing that the sources are impeccable and valid. That was a lie and you cannot provide who these sources are or were.

I did? No I'm arguing for investigation.

Your position is that a war crime has been committed. When asked what laws you are citing to make such an unhinged moronic claim, you ignore it, flail or deflect.

My position is on investigating a war crime. Your resistance to this tells me a lot.

When asked if Obama committed a war crime based on your moronic arguments, you construct a strawman argument.

What straw man? I have stated on record that he should be investigated and if he committed a war crime, he should answer for it. Just like Bush.

So where are these so-called "credible sources" and who are they? What is the criminal statute you claim has been broken?

Hence the investigation.

Is it clear? Or do you need JPP teacher to help you?

 

[AProudLefty]

Who are these sources? You made the claim, didn't you? Why all the flailing and obtuseness?

It's right there on the article, dumbass.