True. High school dropouts can't be expected to know the Socratic method.
Stoicism vs. Materialism
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Certainly not cray-cray, demented or people who are otherwise cognitively impaired like your lil' stalker. Sad.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Do you believe in Climate Change?
That is the entire basis of Global Warming, Climate Change, Ocean Acidification, Disappearing Polar Ice, Sea Level Rise, Extreme Weather, etc.
You believe in all of those, don't you?
This is why you and your fellow leftists can never, ever, ever, ever discuss anything rationally, in an adult manner. You (collectively) will start EVERYTHING with some idiot blabbing about your opinion and require everyone to adopt those baseless assumptions or you will not continue.
Your OP, for example, requires all of your opinions to be accepted as fact as the entry fee for the discussion.
Anytime you'd like me to actually teach you about the Socratic method, just let me know.
I generally start these threads out with the ground rules and definitions of the topic open for discussion, from impartial independent sources.
If you went to college, you might recognize this as akin to the Socratic method.
Rather than crying
about the way I start my threads, just start your own threads the way you want to.You have never read a single word of stoic philosophy. I am starting to think you are mentally ill.
It kant be.
moron
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Great pivot. Answer my questions and we'll see if you really mean what you write in the OP.I generally start these threads out with the ground rules and definitions of the topic open for discussion, from impartial independent sources.
If you went to college, you might recognize this as akin to the Socratic method.
Rather than crying
Answer my questions!
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Another cowardly pivot. I'll assume that you don't believe anything you profess.
You don't ask questions in good faith, that's why I'm not going to invest time in you.
When you demanded I prove there are references to gods in the Buddhist Dhammada, and when I did prove it you ran away
from the thread, never to appear again..
Last edited:
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
It's because Sybil is cray-cray. He's never been right in the head on JPP or his fake forum here: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/You don't ask questions in good faith, that's why I'm not going to invest time in you.
When you demanded I prove there are references to gods in the Buddhist Dhammada, and when I did prove it you ran away
.
BTW, speaking of nutjobs, where's your little buddy? He seems to go in cycles.
My stalker has been eagerly reading
my threads from the distant past, that's why he bumped this old thread, lol
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
He really, really craves your attention. Weird!My stalker has been eagerly reading
I've never had anyone so committed to going into the distant past to read my old postings.
Unrequited love must be blooming for him, because I don't swing that way.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
He needs daddy. You're the father he never knew. Sad.I've never had anyone so committed to going into the distant past to read my old postings.
Unrequited love must be blooming for him, because I don't swing that way.
I would really rather not have guys become so infatuated with me, that they are even going into the distant past to read old threads of mine.Cypress threads are interesting!
I have 70,000 posts here and you cited about 12 examples where I cited a reference from Google to support my claims.
That is an extremely low use of Google, and it's perfectly consistent with how I openly stated I use sources and citations here:
'don't usually' = infrequently or not commonly
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You're back to that error again. You don't get to declare anything about other people's questions. Other people's questions are other people's questions, and if you are too much of a coward to answer them, then don't de surprised when others recognize you as a pathetic coward who doesn't know about what he's talking.
You have never done anything but flee to the hills with your tail between your legs. You have never understood the subject matter you pretend to discuss. In fact, you haven't demonstrated having any knowledge at all.
... you fled to the hills.
... you were in the middle of a delusion.
Thanks for admitting you ranYou're back to that error again!
from a thread after relentlessly demanding I give you proof of my claims.You are a bad faith poster who asks questions in bad faith.
Some stalking idiot bumped this old thread from February 2024, and I barely remember what it was about, let alone have the incentive to backtrack and rehash this discussion.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
He adores you but is pissed that you gave him shit about plagiarizing from Google so now he’s throwing a tantrum whenever you use Google. It’s a measure of his lack of maturity and a primary reason why I believe he is mentally disabled.