Jake Starkey
Verified User
ZenMode does not act as unbiased as he claims. Just my opinion.
SCOTUS protects marriage equality
- Thread starter Jake Starkey
- Start date
IBDaMann
Well-known member
This is all you do, i.e. word games.
We both know that gay men and women marry people of the opposite sex.
FTFY. When we strip away your word games, it all becomes rather clear.
8K views · 257 reactions | Gay for Trump EXPLODES at Kamala Harris and the dems #madisonsquaregarden #trumprally #trump #manonthestreet #jaywalkjournalism | PolitiBrawl Streetcast
Gay for Trump EXPLODES at Kamala Harris and the dems #madisonsquaregarden #trumprally #trump #manonthestreet #jaywalkjournalism
www.facebook.com
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
@IBDaMann I don't think I've ever seen ZenMode flail THIS much before... it's quite remarkable to behold.Anywho...
If there's no difference, then why is necessary to have different names for what is nothing more than a legal agreement.
But ones called marriage and one isn't.
And yet you would label them both "fruit" because they ARE both fruit.
Right, you wouldn't call an apple a fruit and an orange a fruitini... because they're both fruit. I'm very confused by your confusion here....
But one is called a fruit and one is called a fruitini... but they're the same... but different so we don't call them both fruit because....?
Correct. I'm not saying we should call gay people straight or straight people gay, so.....
Nope. You've yet to provide a sensical explanation for why two things that are the SAME, according to you, require different names.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
So there's no problem then?
Who, specifically, can't get married to whoever he or she wants to? Just one specific example would suffice.
There are different types of legal unions but they are all recognized "in the same manner", which is to say they are recognized EQUALLY as legal unions.
IOW, it seems that you are finally agreeing with me?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Answer his question instead of deflecting and flailing.
How is that marriage equality? I am amused by brainless talking points in a vacuum of what marriage between a man and a woman was about in the first place.
Supreme Court rejects challenge to landmark same-sex marriage decision
Kim Davis asked the Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges appealing damages she owed a gay couple after she denied them a marriage license.www.usatoday.com
Supreme Court rejects challenge to landmark same-sex marriage decision
The high court rejected an appeal from Kim Davis, the former county clerk who refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses. Davis asked the court to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges.
Those of you who hate love can go have a good cry.
That stated, if you want to watch the steady collapse of civil society, the way you do it is by destroying what is considered to be the family unit and fill our educational establishment with Marxist lefties so that we can keep graduating idiots like you.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
The problem is that your definition of marriage is not accepted.
Thank goodness for the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling.
It is called marriage, wither or not you like it.
He doesn't agree with your silly definition.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
I'll bite. How will it cause the collapse?How is that marriage equality? I am amused by brainless talking points in a vacuum of what marriage between a man and a woman was about in the first place.
That stated, if you want to watch the steady collapse of civil society, the way you do it is by destroying what is considered to be the family unit and fill our educational establishment with Marxist lefties so that we can keep graduating idiots like you.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
It has already been answered countless times. How much longer do you wish to beat a dead horse?
Marriage's primary purpose was to bind women to men, and thus guarantee that a man's children were truly his biological heirs. This was particularly important in patriarchal societies where these heirs would often inherit leadership roles.
To what end does gay marriage play in that role? In truth, nothing. The idea of marriage has been warped to mean two people in love. But nothing could be further from the truth. Two people in love don't need marriage to bind them. Marriage is a religious institution intended to bind a man and a woman who intend to have their children. Even primitive man knew the importance of a mother and a father to a child's upbringing and normalization.
It's been that way for centuries until we enter the modern age of uneducated derelicts re-imagining what words and institutions mean.
To what end does gay marriage play in that role? In truth, nothing. The idea of marriage has been warped to mean two people in love. But nothing could be further from the truth. Two people in love don't need marriage to bind them. Marriage is a religious institution intended to bind a man and a woman who intend to have their children. Even primitive man knew the importance of a mother and a father to a child's upbringing and normalization.
It's been that way for centuries until we enter the modern age of uneducated derelicts re-imagining what words and institutions mean.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
The problem is that you can't follow along with what has already been addressed.
A completely unconstitutional ruling.
Yes, that's what the legal union between a man and a woman is called, wither or not you like it.
You can't follow along with what has already been addressed.
The deterioration of the two-parent family unit and institutions brainless wonder dunce.
I don't expect you to comprehend obvious things, however. You've been dumbed down to the level of intelligence of a lemming.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
So they can't marry because of gay people?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Not my problem if your definition is not accepted.
Homosexuals won with the SCOTUS ruling. Deal with it.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Nope it hasn't.It has already been answered countless times. How much longer do you wish to beat a dead horse?
Yakuda
Verified User
What post #?
We have a supreme court justice who can't tell us what a woman is because shes not a fucking biologist and you're flapping your gums about a definition of marriage? LMFAO
Everyone loses when we make believe what things actually mean. But you, being a brainless uneducated lying leftist moron, are too stupid to comprehend the OBVIOUS.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Answer my question. Gay marriage is not going to destroy families.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
What have you lost?