Diesel
Well-known member
I can't see it any other way. In fact, I'd go even farther to say that having no conscience would be better than what they are because statistical probabilities would at least guide someone with no conscience to sometimes make a moral decision.I am finding that you are correct.
They are unwilling, unable or afraid to look into their own conscience to answer the question of when is enough, enough. That’s because they have no conscience.
They can't even do that. They are hellbent and determined to ruin or outright end the lives of other people. If you can support someone - as a friend, an acquaintance, or a political personality - who does the things that TACO constantly and consistently does, then you have no redeeming character and are a bad person. I've really reduced it to that. Not because I wanted to, but because you can only have hope for people who want to do good things.