Trust me, Trump says, Ill fix the problems, only after you give up all your leverage.

And back to our basic question Terry, if ObamaCare is such a crappy program and costs too much, why in a decade have the magats not been able to propose anything better to replace it? By your own logic it should be very easy to come up with some thing better and if not that means it must be pretty good.
 
Because

first-rule-government-spending.jpg
Two at thrice the price.
 
And back to our basic question Terry, if ObamaCare is such a crappy program and costs too much, why in a decade have the magats not been able to propose anything better to replace it? By your own logic it should be very easy to come up with some thing better and if not that means it must be pretty good.
They cannot answer.
 
The money was reserved for natural disasters not man made disasters.
Can't be original?

AI Overview
1762307684072.png
1762307684181.png
faviconV2

+7



The phrase "The money was reserved for natural disasters not man made disasters" appears in recent discussions (late 2025) in U.S. politics regarding the use of
state contingency or federal disaster funds.
 
You need to stay on point as yes 'popularity' is exactly the point for a program utilizing citizen taxpayer money and how those citizens want that money used. ObamaCare is not unaffordable if the government prioritizes it over wasteful spending in other areas such as the military.

Popularity is a shit measure to be using for the primary reason for any program to exist.
What, other than is what citizens WANT (popularity) should be the priority for their own tax dollars.

Stuff the nation needs to have and do, stuff that's effective economically, etc. Popularity is a piss poor reason for something to exist on it's own. Mob rule never works and that's what you are advocating for when it comes right down to it.
Oh and take your propaganda elsewhere as Red States rely on Obamacare more while Blue States provide most of the money paying for it and subsidizing Red States.

That's bullshit. Pull out the federal money for programs that aren't people based and the blue states overwhelm the red ones. You are using a common method of camouflaging things by the Left. For example, the Left claims "Immigrants cause less crime." They conflate legal and illegal immigration to water down the FACT that illegal immigrants go to prison at roughly three times their numbers in the population and commit far more crime, particularly violent crime, as but one example.

By including stuff that is geographic or otherwise not attached to the population that the federal government spends on and using that as the basis for each state's federal funding, the Left gets to camouflage the massive costs of the social welfare state in blue states. For example, in Florida Cape Canaveral exists with NASA and the space program. That is geographic and the money spent by the feds in Florida on that program are not population related but geographic. Yet, that spending is rolled into the amount Florida gets by the Left.
---------

Ai Summary:


Red states rely on the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) marketplace plans and associated subsidies the most.

Key factors contributing to this trend include:
  • Higher Enrollment Rates: Red states have seen a significantly larger increase in ACA marketplace enrollment in recent years. Since 2020, enrollment has grown by an average of 157% in states carried by President Trump, compared to only 36% in states carried by former Vice President Kamala Harris.
  • Increased Use of Subsidies: Residents in red states utilize premium tax credits almost twice as frequently as those in blue states. The average monthly benefit from these tax credits is also higher in red states (around $580 per month).
  • Medicaid Expansion Decisions: Many red states initially opted not to expand Medicaid under the ACA, which resulted in more of their low-to-middle-income populations using the federal marketplace and relying heavily on its subsidies to afford coverage.
  • Affected Population: A majority of the people using the ACA live in Republican congressional districts, meaning that potential cuts or the expiration of enhanced subsidies would disproportionately affect residents in these areas. The top states with the highest enrollment increases are largely red states like Texas, Mississippi, West Virginia, and Georgia.
Artificial idiocy is meaningless.

For example it claims the majority of people using the ACA live in Republican congressional districts. How does this break down to people paying for an Obamacare plan in the marketplace and those getting expanded Medicaid for "free" from the federal government?
 
Popularity is a shit measure to be using for the primary reason for any program to exist.


Stuff the nation needs to have and do, stuff that's effective economically, etc. Popularity is a piss poor reason for something to exist on it's own. Mob rule never works and that's what you are advocating for when it comes right down to it.


That's bullshit. Pull out the federal money for programs that aren't people based and the blue states overwhelm the red ones. You are using a common method of camouflaging things by the Left. For example, the Left claims "Immigrants cause less crime." They conflate legal and illegal immigration to water down the FACT that illegal immigrants go to prison at roughly three times their numbers in the population and commit far more crime, particularly violent crime, as but one example.

By including stuff that is geographic or otherwise not attached to the population that the federal government spends on and using that as the basis for each state's federal funding, the Left gets to camouflage the massive costs of the social welfare state in blue states. For example, in Florida Cape Canaveral exists with NASA and the space program. That is geographic and the money spent by the feds in Florida on that program are not population related but geographic. Yet, that spending is rolled into the amount Florida gets by the Left.

Artificial idiocy is meaningless.

For example it claims the majority of people using the ACA live in Republican congressional districts. How does this break down to people paying for an Obamacare plan in the marketplace and those getting expanded Medicaid for "free" from the federal government?
Terry your attempts to avoid answering this below question by providing BS and spin are obvious.

If ObamaCare is such crap, and we both acknowledge that the US needs some form of Healthcare system, why then, in over a decade of promising a replacement have the magats come up with nothing other than repeal which would leave the vast majority of citizens, including magats in red states in much worse position, without any insurance, facing medical related bankruptcies and other prior issues again?

If something is genuinely so horribly bad, as you say, but you cannot devise any thing better then by default, even if you say what is in place is bad, it must be as good as it can get. If you could devise anything better then certainly you would. Arguing that Magats have something better but want to keep it a secret, as Mike Johnson actually said, is just ridiculous and stupid.
 
...
Artificial idiocy is meaningless.
..
And saying the above Terry, is the idiocy.

Artificial Intelligence summaries of a topic are of massive value just as Google Searches of topics are.

You are arguing that the only good data is the type we had to manually search prior to google and AI and that is idiocy.

The ONLY THING an AI summary or Google search does is provide the person a much more broad and quicker access to the data they seek allowing them more time to check the citations and fact check what is presented.

Any pretense that a person instead gathering the same data to present without using AI or Google, as you are trying to suggest Terry, is just your stupidity, in full view.
 
If ObamaCare is such crap, and we both acknowledge that the US needs some form of Healthcare system, why then, in over a decade of promising a replacement have the magats come up with nothing other than repeal which would leave the vast majority of citizens, including magats in red states in much worse position, without any insurance, facing medical related bankruptcies and other prior issues again?

Because pulling off any reform is well-nigh impossible. It isn't just Republicans. Trying to topple a massive bureaucracy that has been in place for decades doesn't happen. Institutional inertia prevents it as much as lots and lots of vested interests. Do you really think the insurance companies, lawyers, healthcare corporations, big pharma, or any of dozens of other big money interests are going to let politicians do something that stops their part of the gravy train?

It is YOU that is delusional.
If something is genuinely so horribly bad, as you say, but you cannot devise any thing better then by default, even if you say what is in place is bad, it must be as good as it can get. If you could devise anything better then certainly you would. Arguing that Magats have something better but want to keep it a secret, as Mike Johnson actually said, is just ridiculous and stupid.
I can devise something better. It'll never happen because there are too many with their hands in the government's pockets with the system that's in place to let it happen. Obamacare just added more complexity and cost to a bad system. It fixed NOTHING.
 
And saying the above Terry, is the idiocy.

Artificial Intelligence summaries of a topic are of massive value just as Google Searches of topics are.

They are for general reference, like some high school student or freshman in college writing a paper for a class. They're of little or no value for in-depth understanding of a topic.
You are arguing that the only good data is the type we had to manually search prior to google and AI and that is idiocy.

No, I'm arguing that AI gives you an answer that's an inch deep and a mile wide when you may need the opposite. AI is only as good as the algorithms it uses. Maybe in 50 years it'll be awesome, but right now it's little better than Wiki.
The ONLY THING an AI summary or Google search does is provide the person a much more broad and quicker access to the data they seek allowing them more time to check the citations and fact check what is presented.

Exactly, and that is insufficient for actually knowing any topic in depth.
Any pretense that a person instead gathering the same data to present without using AI or Google, as you are trying to suggest Terry, is just your stupidity, in full view.
People here use it all the time. You do too. It is usually easy to present better answers looking the stuff up yourself for an extra five minutes than taking the AI answer.
 
Because pulling off any reform is well-nigh impossible. It isn't just Republicans. Trying to topple a massive bureaucracy that has been in place for decades doesn't happen. Institutional inertia prevents it as much as lots and lots of vested interests. Do you really think the insurance companies, lawyers, healthcare corporations, big pharma, or any of dozens of other big money interests are going to let politicians do something that stops their part of the gravy train?

It is YOU that is delusional.

I can devise something better. It'll never happen because there are too many with their hands in the government's pockets with the system that's in place to let it happen. Obamacare just added more complexity and cost to a bad system. It fixed NOTHING.

Right.

so you say the only answer, because it is nigh impossible to come up with anything better, is just to tank ObamaCare, fuck those magats in Red States and others who desperately need it all the while you say you, Terry, could come up with a better plan but no one would accept it.

Somehow Obama could get his plan thru but Trump or no one else could even if ObamaCare was tanked and gone and in your view the only option is to abandon the citizens who rely on it as 'better than nothing.'

You are deranged Terry. full on deranged.

You say all of this as this same Trump admin, and Doge are "toppling massive bureaucracy one by one... but nope... healthcare for citizens must e a nothing offering. Citizens must get nothing'. Citizens who live pay check to pay check need to go back to taking out personal loans or going bankrupt if they have healthcare needs.

You simply are a ridiculous person Terry. Full on cultist.
 
Right.

so you say the only answer, because it is nigh impossible to come up with anything better, is just to tank ObamaCare, fuck those magats in Red States and others who desperately need it all the while you say you, Terry, could come up with a better plan but no one would accept it.

Yes. Tank Obamacare and revert the system to what it was previously.
Somehow Obama could get his plan thru but Trump or no one else could even if ObamaCare was tanked and gone and in your view the only option is to abandon the citizens who rely on it as 'better than nothing.'

You are deranged Terry. full on deranged.

You say all of this as this same Trump admin, and Doge are "toppling massive bureaucracy one by one... but nope... healthcare for citizens must e a nothing offering. Citizens must get nothing'. Citizens who live pay check to pay check need to go back to taking out personal loans or going bankrupt if they have healthcare needs.

You simply are a ridiculous person Terry. Full on cultist.
DOGE is toppling nothing. It's getting rid of some of the fat but even that is temporary. Trump will be out, some Democrat--at some point--will get in (or a RINO) and the bureaucracy will grow back like a big wart.

Nobody at the top in government gives a rat's ass that some working stiff goes bankrupt. That's reality. Citizens at the bottom get the scraps. The only question is: How many scraps are there? Socialism gives out the fewest because the scraps are tightly controlled by a bureaucracy.
 
Your fuck no matter what huh

Along with all the pedos Donny sucks up to
Evince - I'm not telling you what to do - but I highly suggest you put that demon on ignore. I did a couple of months ago and very glad I did.

Uncensored is useless. Nothing but propaganda with zero proof. Ignoring that troll is my best advice.
 
Evince - I'm not telling you what to do - but I highly suggest you put that demon on ignore. I did a couple of months ago and very glad I did.

Uncensored is useless. Nothing but propaganda with zero proof. Ignoring that troll is my best advice.
It’s that exact pot of piss that needs crushing

I fight the idiocy with facts

People read these pages

People then see them decimated by facts and heavy doses of the SHAME this society needs to heap on these lying losers
 
Yes. Tank Obamacare and revert the system to what it was previously.

DOGE is toppling nothing. It's getting rid of some of the fat but even that is temporary. Trump will be out, some Democrat--at some point--will get in (or a RINO) and the bureaucracy will grow back like a big wart.

Nobody at the top in government gives a rat's ass that some working stiff goes bankrupt. That's reality. Citizens at the bottom get the scraps. The only question is: How many scraps are there? Socialism gives out the fewest because the scraps are tightly controlled by a bureaucracy.
Your efforts of the last 4 Decades is being exposed


The people have caught on


You will not be able to cheat enough to win anymore

Not even the wealthy tech CEOs can help you now

The people hate your team

Release the EPSTIEN files

Some of those fucks are in there
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Back
Top