[pivot #1] Life doesn't end at birth. [pivot #2] Many would say that that's when it actually starts. [pivot #3] As I've noted in the past, the most common reasons females have given for having abortions are financial.
i.e. convenience. Those women expressed how financially inconvenient it would be for them to have to take responsibility for their deliberate actions. Killing supremacists then begin to spin "inconvenience" into being so much more than just mere "inconvenience", however, inconvenience only rises to the level of inconvenience.
So what we have is inconvenience taking precedence over, and being the determining factor in, a life-and-death situation.
I'm sure you would agree that millions of born children shouldn't be dying each year, and yet they do.
Egregious passive voice fallacy. You stripped away all deliberate decisions and actions and made one really lame passive voice expression.
Right here you are once again treating abortions as though they are just random occurrences that you can somehow rightfully address in the passive voice. This is the point in which you feign indignance and write "... but I never SAID that abortions are random occurrences. " I know, you weren't honest enough to come right out and say that this is what you are doing ...
... but you are doing it.
Do pro-deathers care about the welfare of the children they pay someone to kill? Oooops. Stupid question.
[pivot #4] I believe that those who want to like "defending the inalienable right to remain alive of a living human" should focus more energy on born children and less on pregnant females
Don't worry, I haven't shifted my focus onto the irresponsible pregnant women who have their own children executed to reduce their own inconvenience, to avoid all accountability for their own deliberate choices and actions, and to maintain killing supremacy. I remain laser-focused on the living humans who are being executed because of the inconvenience they represent to those with killing supremacy. The victims of the contract killings remain the center of the play and I am keeping my eye on the ball.
who may be concerned that carrying their pregnancy to term will mean a life of hardship and perhaps even a quick death after their birth.
Nope. Your exaggerated melodrama is insufficient to distract me. It is never acceptable to kill someone else over one's irresponsible decisions. Those pregnant women deliberately engaged in activity that resulted in pregnancy. The pregnancy did not cause the irresponsible behavior. No woman should be killing her own children, especially just for convenience.
As I mentioned to you in a previous post,
I think we can all agree that these nine words were not needed. Why don't you ever write "As you have told me repeatedly ..."?
[pivot #5] this is where alleged pro lifers tend to fall flat,
I'm right over here. Stay focused on me. Answer my nine questions and address my commentary. I'm not any of the other unnamed people to whom you pretend to refer.
