The Charlie Kirk Shuffle: false idol

WinterBorn said:
I provided a link to Johnson quotes.

I'm sorry I can't get LBJ to personally verify what he said. But his dying kinda ruins that.


I posted something. You questioned it. I provided a link that verified it.

Rather than discuss that, you decided to go for personal bullshit. Typical for a leftist.
Click to expand...
what did Johnson say that's relevant in some way to today?

explain like I'm 5.
 
FastLane said:
BECAUSE SHE WAS A TERRIBLE CANDIDATE! Next time have a real primary and select the best candidate. My dog would make a better candidate than Harris. She was a no talent DEI hire that washed out of the 2020 primary first. Checked the female and the black box but the talent box was left blank.
Click to expand...
Her credentials far exceeded your reality show felon. And we’re seeing those results now.
 
I mean she's so incredibly popular now... How in the world did she lose? Oh wait.... Her political career is over... Her career as an author is over.... What failures will come next?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
She had four months to campaign. He started campaigning the day he unleashed the dogs of war on our Capitol, 1/6/21. Even so, she only lost by 1.5% of the total vote. It would seem that millions do not agree with your assessment.
Click to expand...
She literally lost to an unpopular convicted felon. They ran against him from 01/21/2017 right up past when he lost... through the time they prosecuted him for crimes they had to stretch to come up with... then as unpopular as he was he beat them in the next election. She had far more time to run against him... The issue is she was a terrible candidate, you lost to an unpopular felon because you would not run a serious primary. You thought that the braindead could be ignored at least until November... and that you stood a chance.
 
FastLane said:
Because people like Joy Reid will tell you sometimes. But that is the point that Charlie Kirk was making when you see a Black airline pilot or a Black neuro-surgeon you wonder if they got there through DEI or merit. That isn't fair to Black people like Ben Carson that got their position through merit and not by the color of their skin. If I'm going to put my life in the hands of someone I like knowing they got their job through merit regardless of what color their skin is.
Click to expand...
I don't care about Joy Reid. I asked you because you're a maga, she's not. At what level do you start to wonder if someone is DEI, for instance do you give that mental test to your auto mechanic, electrician or plumber?

It seems to me that if a minority is in the higher levels of position or employment, i.e. doctor, judge, college professor, your DEI radar goes off. So where's the point where the difference between non-DEI and DEI occurs?
 
Into the Night said:
Yes you are.

Irrelevant. The Constitution is not involved here.

It does not say any such thing.

Lie. You support government censorship. You support crime and violence. You support the banning and limiting of guns. You think a court has authority over the Constitution.

Yet you despise it.

You never did. DON'T TRY TO STEAL FALSE VALOR! DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!
Click to expand...

I have never supported gov't censorship.
I have never supported crime or violence.
I have been a shooter, a hunter and a collector since I was a kid.
I am more of a supporter of the 2nd amendment than you ever dreamed of being.
The US Constitution is the ultimate authority and the foundation of our nation.

And yes, I did serve. I was onboard the USS James Madison, SSBN 627.


Don't know who you thought I was, but you missed it by a mile.
 
christiefan915 said:
I don't care about Joy Reid. I asked you because you're a maga, she's not. At what level do you start to wonder if someone is DEI, for instance do you give that mental test to your auto mechanic, electrician or plumber?

It seems to me that if a minority is in the higher levels of position or employment, i.e. doctor, judge, college professor, your DEI radar goes off. So where's the point where the difference between non-DEI and DEI occurs?
Click to expand...
I would wonder if they do it based on the criteria used to choose them. If their race was among that criteria, that would be a DEI hire.

Let's say I have a checklist. And one item is more important than any of the rest. The person must be a Martian to get this position because Martians are not represented enough....

This discounts every other qualified candidate. Only Martians will be considered.

This would be a DEI hire. Even if the Martian would have gotten the job if every other race of being was considered, the fact that they were not would signify that it was DEI. Even if they do not announce it, the fact that they chose intersectionally rather than experientially would make it a DEI hire.

I would wonder that. I am not answering for them. She was certainly qualified, every American born citizen above the age of 35 is "qualified", the constitution says so. That doesn't mean I want someone like my next door neighbor to be President, only that he's as qualified as she if you go by that minimalist interpretation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top