Matt Dillon
Retardium User
God said "Be fruitful and multiply". 
He never said to kill any babies in the womb.
He never said to kill any babies in the womb.
Why women have abortions
- Thread starter Scott
- Start date
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
yes.The most cowardly contract killing possible.
You know the target is always innocent in that situation. I heard abortion was taught by the Nephilim. Inclined to believe it, too.
Some real hits may involve taking out some very bad men.
Not that that's right, but it happens. Sometimes it may be kinda right.
It's all according to God's plan, afaik.
and its usually not for something noble like national security or the dispatching of criminals in the act.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
God said "Be fruitful and multiply".
He never said to kill any babies in the womb.
LOL.
GIant bag of dicks.
my favorite.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
pay attention to the actual argument part.Not in the part of text that I quoted above you weren't. There, you were engaging in the ad hominem fallacy. Quoting from the link I provided previously:
**
You've probably stumbled across people arguing by attacking someone's character instead of their ideas. Maybe you've even been guilty of this yourself. The bottom line is, attacking the other person's character instead of their argument is often unproductive, and it's known as an ad hominem fallacy.
**
Source:
Ad Hominem Fallacy (18 Examples + Definition)
You've probably stumbled across people arguing by attacking someone's character instead of their ideas. Maybe you've even been guilty of this yourself.practicalpie.com
you have none of that and rely on word games.
what are you going to do when we no longer use words and have direct mind to mind psychic communication without words (or technology)?
I believe my lying eyesAs Lefty pointed out in response to your post in his post #88, that's some pretty strong language there. I decided to see the definitions of the word 'whore'. The first one that came up on wordnik.com was "A prostitute":
Now, I'm sure there are -some- females who get abortions who are, in fact, prostitutes, but I suspect that the vast majority aren't. But if you believe you have evidence to the contrary, by all means, provide it.
Some people meaning a very tiny fraction of the total abortions. Some come from rape and incest too but listening to the baby killers you would think this is most of them.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Does it really make sense to mischaracterize convenience as somehow dealing with dire circumstances? 99%+ of abortions are simply for convenience. Dishonest people do the following:
* Focus on the <1% that perhaps involve more than mere inconvenience
* Refuse to acknowledge the living human being killed
* Refuse to acknowledge the contractual nature of the killing of the living human involved
* Treat pregnancies as random, unforeseeable and unavoidable events instead of as foreseeable results of deliberate activity
* Seek killing supremacy for a certain group of people
-- seek to empower said group to engage in contract killings that are illegal for everyone else
-- seek to render a certain group (currently the unborn) powerless to prevent their own execution
* Pretend that math is somehow subjectively disputable, i.e. something with which one may "disagree"
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Nope. When "the sprak of life" refers to the hearbeat, it is the position of the global medical community, and only lunatic haters of humanity disagree.
Into the Night
Verified User
Blatant lie. There certainly are.
Into the Night
Verified User
Random pivot. No apparent coherency.
Into the Night
Verified User
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
only Christians are against murder?
how fucking dumb and evil and retarded are you?
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
colloquially, whore also means slut.As Lefty pointed out in response to your post in his post #88, that's some pretty strong language there. I decided to see the definitions of the word 'whore'. The first one that came up on wordnik.com was "A prostitute":
Now, I'm sure there are -some- females who get abortions who are, in fact, prostitutes, but I suspect that the vast majority aren't. But if you believe you have evidence to the contrary, by all means, provide it.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
Scott
Verified User
Alright, so does that mean that you're against it then?
Scott
Verified User
The goal of Phyllis and most if not all of those here who are against the right of most pregnant women to choose to have abortions is to muddy the waters between humans who have been born and humans who haven't been. This is why they like ambiguous words like human, human life, baby and child rather than one word that everyone knows the specific meaning of, (human) fetus.
Scott
Verified User
yes.Congratulations on getting around one of my previous objections in regards to IBDaMann's argument that abortions are a subset of contract killings- namely, you avoided using any form of the word kill. However, As A Proud Lefty pointed out in response to this post of yours, "Another" implies "additional person". At the heart of this argument is whether we believe that a fetus is truly a person or whether it hasn't yet reached that stage. Clearly, I and Lefty don't believe it's yet reached that stage. This matter because if it's not at that stage, I believe the wishes of its mother should take precedence over the life of the fetus. Finally, there's also the potential suffering said fetus might have to endure if the mother doesn't terminate her pregnancy and it goes on to be born into this world with inadequate resources. As I've mentioned elsewhere, millions of children die each year shortly -after- they are born. The World Health Organization has a page on these deaths here:
Child mortality and causes of death
<strong style="background-color:transparent;font-size:16px;text-align:inherit;text-transform:inherit;white-space:inherit;word-spacing:normal;caret-color:auto;"></strong><p>Substantial global progress has been made in reducing childhood mortality since 1990. The total number of under-5 deaths...www.who.int
Does it really make sense to refuse to give pregnant women abortions when their situation is so dire that their child will die within the first 5 years of life?
So you're saying that it makes "sense to refuse to give pregnant women abortions when their situation is so dire that their child will die within the first 5 years of life"?
On the contrary, I'm doing my best to point out why I believe what I believe- in this case, the best way to do this is to make it clear that I see a human fetus as less valuable than the pregnant female who hosts it. This is hard to do if people such as yourself keep on using ambiguous words such as baby, child and human life, words that muddy the waters as to what, precisely, we're talking about.
Scott
Verified User
I imagine you're referring to this:
Spark of Life: Scientists discover moment souls enter eggs at the time of conception - Marriage & Family - Home & Family - News - Catholic Online
'It was remarkable.' In a miraculous, literally life-changing discovery, scientists have discovered the moment a soul enters a fertilized egg. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Catholics have long ...
www.catholic.org
The thing is, even catholic sites now admit that story wasn't accurate:
Contrary to Reports, There is No Flash of Light at Conception
The Telegraph recently reported something sensational. “Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins when sperm meets egg.” The article stated, “...
www.ncregister.com
Human life begins with sperms and eggs, though they do ofcourse have to join in order to create a fetus, that, if the pregnancy is brought to term, turns into a born human being. Pretty much everyone agrees the once a human life reaches the point that it physically separates from the female that hosted it as a fetus, it is accorded the status of personhood. The argument is whether pregnant woman should have the right to terminate their pregnancies, just like a male has a right to masturbate and thus release their sperm to an almost certain death.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
That's quite the bold lie there, cupcake.I imagine you're referring to this:
Spark of Life: Scientists discover moment souls enter eggs at the time of conception - Marriage & Family - Home & Family - News - Catholic Online
'It was remarkable.' In a miraculous, literally life-changing discovery, scientists have discovered the moment a soul enters a fertilized egg. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Catholics have long ...
The thing is, even catholic sites now admit that story wasn't accurate:
Contrary to Reports, There is No Flash of Light at Conception
The Telegraph recently reported something sensational. “Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins when sperm meets egg.” The article stated, “...
Human life begins with sperms and eggs, though they do ofcourse have to join in order to create a fetus, that, if the pregnancy is brought to term, turns into a born human being. Pretty much everyone agrees the once a human life reaches the point that it physically separates from the female that hosted it as a fetus, it is accorded the status of personhood. The argument is whether pregnant woman should have the right to terminate their pregnancies, just like a male has a right to masturbate and thus release their sperm to an almost certain death.
It is the case, as you already know; you're just going to lie and pull shit out of your ass like the other commies, no matter what.