I’ll repeat this since my last post explaining this was 3 minutes ago.Where is the link to a credible source saying it exists?
The Feds won’t release it to me.
Why are you now sucking Comey’s Johnson?
I’ll repeat this since my last post explaining this was 3 minutes ago.Where is the link to a credible source saying it exists?
Oh come on you know they just randomly asked Nathan Wade to the White House. It had absolutely nothing to do with the case Wade was prosecuting against Trump or at least that is what the Bartender thinks.I see meetings with prosecutors at the WH... they tell you that there was "no record of private meetings"... As I said, minimal deniability, but plausible deniability was clearly on their minds. IMHO, this just shows that they are more adept at swamp activity more than it shows their innocence.
In other words, you have no evidence Biden was involved.Trump is foolish enough not to work behind the scenes. He has zero plausible deniability when he's telling them to prosecute people publicly. Braindead's handlers went behind the scenes to get it done.
The difference here isn't in whether it was done, it is in how it was done. One side, more practiced at it, protected themselves, the other... either naive or just plain foolish, didn't.
Where is the tape of him saying he approved a leak?
Well, the WH has documented that there was "no private meeting" so... naturally we should believe them. (/sarcasm) At this point, documentation gives them deniability. This is my point. Trump took that deniability, threw it in the trash, and said the quiet part out loud.Oh come on you know they just randomly asked Nathan Wade to the White House. It had absolutely nothing to do with the case Wade was prosecuting against Trump or at least that is what the Bartender thinks.
Biden cooperated with any investigation. Did he hire any lawyers to stymie any investigation? Petition the courts to do so? And where did you get “50 years of collecting”?No, I mean the ones he illegally collected for 50 years in his house against the law. He didn't "voluntarily" give them up, and he never would done a thing had he not been caught with more SCI documents in his garage. I do not care who you are, if you mishandle classified documents that badly you deserve what I would have gotten for one dang document accidentally left inside a book as a bookmark when I was in the Navy.
They thought he would be perceived as a "nice old man with a bad memory"... Geebus.
You are a day late and a dollar short…where were you when the vegetable was pres?The whole "Floyd is your hero....Kimmel is your hero....Comey is your hero" thing is deflection & silly.
People are concerned about police brutality, free speech and executive overreach, respectively. The right trying to dismissively state that these people are now "heroes" is just an attempt to marginalize the actual issue.
You are a day late and a dollar short…where were you when the vegetable was pres?
We’ll see what everyone has to say under oath. If it gets that far.They have two witnesses that say Comey leaked to the press. One of them is Comey's friend from law school. No one is above the Law. Leticia James is next.
Again. He did not. For 50 years he hid the crime. Those years matter. He broke the law for more than half his life. And you think that just saying I'll cooperate should exonerate him for a felony level criminal activity? If I kill someone, should I get away with it because I was helpful in the investigation? Nonsense. If I had done just a smidgeon of what he has done when I was in the Navy, it would not matter how "helpful" I was, I'd still be in prison today.Biden cooperated with any investigation. Did he hire any lawyers to stymie any investigation? Petition the courts to do so? And where did you get “50 years of collecting”?
Unlike Trump, who used every means possible to block the investigation.
Factual history is not boring.Whataboutism is usually boring.
What we are asking is where’s YOUR proof that he did.Are you seriously going to say Biden didn't give the OK for the DOJ to go after Trump? Yes or No.
Tell us your proof he did.Tell me if you think the DOJ went after a former President in over 240 years without the authorization from the POTUS. Stop spinning.
It will go to trial for sure.We’ll see what everyone has to say under oath. If it gets that far.
Factual history is not boring.
Well, considering that the witnesses for the prosecution testified under oath before Congress already I think their testimony is likely to be the same under oath a second time. Do I think it is enough to convict Comey in Virginia where it is near impossible to convict a Swamp Creature? No.We’ll see what everyone has to say under oath. If it gets that far.
As I said transparency is refreshing.Well, the WH has documented that there was "no private meeting" so... naturally we should believe them. (/sarcasm) At this point, documentation gives them deniability. This is my point. Trump took that deniability, threw it in the trash, and said the quiet part out loud.
I read the article, but I see no links to McCabe’s actual statements.You understand wrong.
Comey has said he was unaware of the leak, but McCabe has indicated Comey knew about and authorized the leak. Comey has also said McCabe implied in a conversation with him after the Journal’s report that he also wasn’t aware of the leak.
Did you say anything when the Braindead Administration was pushing everyone that disagreed with them off the public forum, or is this the sudden clarity that comes when you think it is being done to people you agree with?The whole "Floyd is your hero....Kimmel is your hero....Comey is your hero" thing is deflection & silly.
People are concerned about police brutality, free speech and executive overreach, respectively. The right trying to dismissively state that these people are now "heroes" is just an attempt to marginalize the actual issue.