NYT - Pre-published the WRONG VERDICT for Trump's Attempted Assassin...

The paper continues to be regarded across the globe as one of the finest newspapers in the world,
Sure, by far leftists.
and the best in the U.S.
A very low bar.
Already this year it has won four Pulitizers
The Pulitzer Prize Board has been left leaning for decades. FFS, it’s administered by Columbia University
including one for its new coverage of the assassination attempt on Trump.
Wow. Because that was big news.

As always, ignoramuses hate it.
No, those who see the obvious bias hate it.
You no doubt consider a left leaning but highly objective rag like The Economist to be nazi propaganda.
 
The New York Times is a fine newspaper...and its coverage of the news is excellent. But, THE TRUTH is what MAGA morons call "slanting left" so, since The Times reports the truth, MAGA morons have to bad mouth it. They, morons that they are, think FOX News is what news reporting should be.


What about those that consider the NYTimes and Fox News to suck?
Are we MAGAs too?
 
Last edited:

Probably ignoramuses like most all the other self appointed critics.
As I thought. Anyone that doesn’t subscribe 100% to far leftist ideology is a nazi racist and not to be tolerated.
Moderation is treason.
 
Last edited:
Not Guilty? LOL - link

Would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh was declared guilty on Tuesday on all charges, but The New York Times accidentally published the wrong article.

In journalism, outlets often pre-write obituaries, election outcomes and potential court verdicts of major cases before they occur, using the basic facts of the story and adding whatever key details are essential on the day of.


However, a screenshot indicated that the New York Times accidentally published a headline, "Man Found Not Guilty of Trying to Assassinate Trump in Florida." The lede of the now-scrubbed article added, "In a surprise verdict, a federal jury acquitted Ryan Routh of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate last year. The screenshot also indicated that the article would be published in the print edition on September 24, 2025.
The NYT is made up of people, and people make mistakes, I’m not sure why people think a mistake is bigger than consistently lying and refusing to admit it.

About half of America has reached a point where they disrespect someone who admits a mistake, and towards a person who consistently lies.
 
The NYT is made up of people, and people make mistakes, I’m not sure why people think a mistake is bigger than consistently lying and refusing to admit it.

About half of America has reached a point where they disrespect someone who admits a mistake, and towards a person who consistently lies.
The NYT's lying to us is not a mistake.
 
A "thought" that came to you easily, I'm sure.
You claim you have a subscription to the NYTimes?
Even they were highly critical of the democrats for being too elitist, being intolerant of even their own that didn’t subscribe to 100% of their far left agenda.
And what did they, the democrats, do? Criticize the NYTimes for becoming right wing.
And even today you still don’t get it. You double down on the same nonsense that got you where you are today.
The Dem brand is in the toilet.
 
The NYT is made up of people, and people make mistakes, I’m not sure why people think a mistake is bigger than consistently lying and refusing to admit it.

About half of America has reached a point where they disrespect someone who admits a mistake, and towards a person who consistently lies.
How very true!
 
You claim you have a subscription to the NYTimes?
Even they were highly critical of the democrats for being too elitist, being intolerant of even their own that didn’t subscribe to 100% of their far left agenda.
And what did they, the democrats, do? Criticize the NYTimes for becoming right wing.
And even today you still don’t get it. You double down on the same nonsense that got you where you are today.
The Dem brand is in the toilet.
Your avatar makes it look as though you are in your toilet.
 
You must not read it. Give it a try. The Times is as good as ever. Try not to confuse news articles with the three percent of the paper given to political opinion columns. As for "pre-written articles and especially obits of prominent people", pre-written means prepared as working drafts for when the news date arrives.
More proof you are a lost soul.
 
The New York Times is a fine newspaper...and its coverage of the news is excellent. But, THE TRUTH is what MAGA morons call "slanting left" so, since The Times reports the truth, MAGA morons have to bad mouth it. They, morons that they are, think FOX News is what news reporting should be.

:eyeroll:
That Depends frankie.
 
Back
Top