Contract Killing

That'd be because I don't believe that abortions qualify as a subset of contract killings.
Your mistaken beliefs are irrelevant. Set theory is math and is not open to subjective interpretations or individual beliefs.

You have not explained how {customer who is a pregnant woman} is somehow not a proper subset of {customer}.

Your status of "wrong" remains unchanged.
 
I don't accept any "dictionary definition" as a trump card of any sort. I would argue that the "dictionary definitions" that you are referencing here are in error, purposely using dehumanizing verbiage (and purposely leaving out key verbiage) in order to mask the horror of what is truly happening.
It looks like you won't be fooled anytime soon.
 
No, the issue here is deeper- we disagree that voluntary abortions should be defined as a subset of killings.
You are chanting. I have already refuted your idea that you somehow get to "disagree" with math.

Your view omits the killing of the living human being killed. If you were to include the killing of the living human being killed, you would probably see the killing of the living human that is involved.
It has everything to do with math and your denial of set theory. I laid it all out for you. ... and your explanation is nothing more than a rejection of math.

You have yet to explain these math errors you assert that I made.
 
Contract killing (i.e. an order done on an adult human being) is murder.
Nope. A contract killing is a killing performed on contract.

There are no age requirements, no legality requirements, no sentience requirements and no consciousness requirements.
 
Nope. A contract killing is a killing performed on contract.

There are no age requirements, no legality requirements, no sentience requirements and no consciousness requirements.
Let's say your definition is accepted, what would your next argument be?
 
I don't believe you do.


This confirms my suspicions that you cannot read for comprehension.
Projecting does not help your argument.

Just go ahead and say abortion is murder. It would clear things up and save our time in wasting our time in defining words.
 
Just go ahead and say abortion is murder. It would clear things up and save our time in wasting our time in defining words.
This just confirms my suspicions that you cannot read for comprehension.

I don't use the word "abortion" except to specify a proper subset of contract killing.
 
Back
Top