I, too, care little what someone is wearing, or not wearing, in public ... presuming my family is not around.

If we have laws on the books that impose fines, penalties and/or jail time to heterosexuals for acting indecently in public, then there is no valid argument for allowing homosexuals to break those laws just because they are crying "We are always being VICTIMIZED!" They are not somehow being victimized by being denied supremacy. They should be subject to the exact same laws in the exact same way, i.e. equal under the law.

That sounds reasonable. The points I mentioned against various Russian laws and norms does not in my view.
 
I -suspect- that, though you may not be aware of it, the term started being used due to Donnie McClurkin's book. As I said, I hadn't heard of the term before, but now I have. In any case, I hadn't heard of this "Eternal Victim" term before, nor of this "LGBT-supremacy" that you also mentioned.
He's angry. He just make up lies about LGBT for some reason.
 
I -suspect- that, though you may not be aware of it, the term started being used due to Donnie McClurkin's book. As I said, I hadn't heard of the term before, but now I have. In any case, I hadn't heard of this "Eternal Victim" term before, nor of this "LGBT-supremacy" that you also mentioned.
Anyone advocating for inequality under the law, is advocating for some type of supremacy. LGBT has all the same rights as everyone else, and they are ardently fighting for more rights, which would give them preferential treatment under the law. This is undeniably a goal of supremacy, even if they are dishonestly using the wording "We are fighting for LGBT rights." They currently have equality; they are fighting for supremacy to which they believe they are entitled.
 
Anyone advocating for inequality under the law, is advocating for some type of supremacy. LGBT has all the same rights as everyone else, and they are ardently fighting for more rights, which would give them preferential treatment under the law. This is undeniably a goal of supremacy, even if they are dishonestly using the wording "We are fighting for LGBT rights." They currently have equality; they are fighting for supremacy to which they believe they are entitled.
Give examples to this "supremacy".
 
That sounds reasonable. The points I mentioned against various Russian laws and norms does not in my view.
Then explain why denying LGBT supremacy is somehow unreasonable. Why should anyone in the LGBT movement be allowed to act indecently in public whereas everyone else is not? Russia has banned such behavior in protests. You find that to be unreasonable. Explain. The floor is yours.
 
If you can't read at the adult level, just say so. Admit that you are terrified that your petty dishonesty will be revealed.
It's okay. Just say that you have no examples.

supremacy

noun
  1. the state or condition of being superior to all others in authority, power, or status.
 
At issue here are the so-called LGBT activist protests, or the "Pride" protests. In Europe, they often involve a great deal of public indecency, and while Europe affords all people all the same rights, and guarantees everyone the right to protest, the LGBT movement demands supremacy and the ability to behave indecently in public, otherwise they cry "We are such VICTIMS!" Russia banned this sort of behavior, and the moment they did, the internet was flooded with the already-prepared narrative of "Russia's crackdown on gays and lesbians". Unfortunately, @Scott fell for the propaganda, but everybody knew that because he immediately cited Wikipedia.

seattle-pride-parade-nude-adults-infront-of-children-v0-cmxhMGc3NnVmOThiMY2y7EAn1AjvNcXE4e5uDfArYqqxKljXDnLa44XmZFg7.png


toronto-pride-parade-nudity.jpg
Call these what they are: Sex parades and protests. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Mardi Gras and summer break.

Oh and I forgot about porn.
Changes nothing. You're just using whataboutisms. "Pride" parades are really just sex parades. I think in the spirit of inclusivity they should invite the topless bars, hookers, various fetishes, and such to join them in their celebration of deviant sex.
 
Changes nothing. You're just using whataboutisms. "Pride" parades are really just sex parades. I think in the spirit of inclusivity they should invite the topless bars, hookers, various fetishes, and such to join them in their celebration of deviant sex.
They're all invited. Have you ever been to a pride parade, you idiot bigot?
 
No, it isn't. Mardi Gras and spring break, wherever it occurs, are about drunken debauchery and stupidity. They aren't primarily sex related. That's incidental to the occasion.
Pride is exactly about drunken debauchery and stupidity. Do you have any idea what comes out of your mouth/keyboard anymore or are you just 100% self unaware?
 
Back
Top