Trump Should Get Nobel Peace Prize for Brokering Cease-Fire Deal, Cambodian Deputy PM Says

Yes we know the Peace Prize is just a valueless award that Liberals give themselves.
And yet you are begging for it for Trump.

Nothing more embarrassing than you will take even a warmonger, like Netanyahu's praise for one war monger to another to say Trump deserves it.

Obama and that award live rent free in your head and it is delicious seeing you cry over it.
 
And yet you are begging for it for Trump.

Nothing more embarrassing than you will take even a warmonger, like Netanyahu's praise for one war monger to another to say Trump deserves it.

Obama and that award live rent free in your head and it is delicious seeing you cry over it.
I keep on hopping the Nobel committee will do the right thing. But they are liberals so it isn't likely. Obama didn't do any thing to earn the prize yet the Uber-liberals on the committee gave it to him anyway.
 
I keep on hopping the Nobel committee will do the right thing. But they are liberals so it isn't likely. Obama didn't do any thing to earn the prize yet the Uber-liberals on the committee gave it to him anyway.
You just said it was valueless so what's the big deal?

Bet you didn't complain when that conspiracy-addled junkie Rush Limbaugh got the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Now that was a travesty.
 
You just said it was valueless so what's the big deal?

Bet you didn't complain when that conspiracy-addled junkie Rush Limbaugh got the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Now that was a travesty.
The NPP was once a prestigious award before the Liberals ruined it. I would like to see its former prestige returned.

Nominations for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize closed just 11 days after Obama took office.

What did Obama do in those 11 days to advance peace?

The Presidential medal of freedom is another meaningless babble.

Biden gave one to Hillary and to Magic Johnson :rofl2:
 
I keep on hopping the Nobel committee will do the right thing. But they are liberals so it isn't likely. Obama didn't do any thing to earn the prize yet the Uber-liberals on the committee gave it to him anyway.
Your arguments are as stupid as you are.

You are pushing one central position, which i will ignore that it is invalid as others have already pointed.

That position or argument is 'since Obama got it and did not deserve it then Trump should get one too'.


Because you are stupid you do not realize that argument does not work. Oh 'the umpire made a clear mistake and called a strike and was wrong so now he needs to make a wrong call on the other team on purpose'.

No one agrees with such stupidity and yet here you are pushing it while thinking it is a valid argument. :rofl2:
 
Your arguments are as stupid as you are.

You are pushing one central position, which i will ignore that it is invalid as others have already pointed.

That position or argument is 'since Obama got it and did not deserve it then Trump should get one too'.


Because you are stupid you do not realize that argument does not work. Oh 'the umpire made a clear mistake and called a strike and was wrong so now he needs to make a wrong call on the other team on purpose'.

No one agrees with such stupidity and yet here you are pushing it while thinking it is a valid argument. :rofl2:
OK genius <sarcasm> Obama had been in office for 11 days when nominations for the 2009 Peace Prize closed exactly what did he do in those 11 days to earn the PP?
 
OK genius <sarcasm> Obama had been in office for 11 days when nominations for the 2009 Peace Prize closed exactly what did he do in those 11 days to earn the PP?
Explain first how the guy who gets a bad call (if you assume the call is bad) means the other team then must get a deliberate bad call?

You must demonstrate you understand the position you are pushing before i answer you.
 
Explain first how the guy who gets a bad call (if you assume the call is bad) means the other team then must get a deliberate bad call?

You must demonstrate you understand the position you are pushing before i answer you.
OIP.GVUmkhonJMZDZ7iw704HGAHaFj
 
Using the Maga parrot mode...a fast lane to stupidity, as predicted. You're done.
The Nobel nominations closed February 1st 2009 just 11 days after Obama became President on January 20th 2009 now tell me what Obama did in those 11 days that was worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize? Come on trachea I want to hear it.
 
Last edited:
Explain first how the guy who gets a bad call (if you assume the call is bad) means the other team then must get a deliberate bad call?

You must demonstrate you understand the position you are pushing before i answer you.
So you have no answer for what Obama did in the first 11 days of his Presidency to earn a Nobel Peace Prize. The is what I figured.


:attaboy2:
 

It is the opposite of changing of the topic.

If he is arguing that Trump deserves a noble prize because Obama got one he thinks Obama does not deserve he must then show how that is a valid argument, even if true.

My position is, even if correct (which it is not) the argument fails just as arguing a wrong umpire call saying a foul ball is a home run does not mean the other then gets a home run when they did not earn it.

I get you magats, 'The Poorly Educates' do not understand that but he is arguing nothing. No point.
 
So you have no answer for what Obama did in the first 11 days of his Presidency to earn a Nobel Peace Prize. The is what I figured.


:attaboy2:

Case closed. You cannot make a case for Trump nor even begin to try and explain the stupidity you are trying to connect.
 
Back
Top