US drone crew blamed for Afghan civilian deaths

Here - let me help you out. Here is another link I found showing that the "drastic decline" was in 2007 (the other one I posted dealt w/ an even further decline in the beginning of '08):

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1923063520070820

So, basically, you're wrong. Your caricature of a media that was posting body counts & war stories and "blame Bush" stories every day, 24x7, is just BS. Maybe you saw it that way, but it's only because you're an extreme partisan who finds it impossible to see & think objectively.

Hope this helps.
 
poor homosexually frustrated dunceler....can't get anything right and since he is incapable of admitting he is wrong...he will continue forever and ever to claim there is no difference, refuse to admit the election year was temporary, the afghan war had an UPTICK in violence and death in 2009 and 2010...but never did the media pick up on it as they did under bush

why? because a dem is in office....

unfortunately we will be treated with more nonsense and homosexually intimate nicknames like yurtsie from onceler

yawn
 
LOL

Yurtsie ignores actual facts when they're right in front of his face, and offers nothing of his own, other than "this is a fact, and if you can't see that you're a fool!"

Poor Yurtsie. Sorry that the truth is in your way!
 
"the afghan war had an UPTICK in violence and death in 2009 and 2010...but never did the media pick up on it as they did under bush"

Btw, if you check the one article I posted, coverage actually did go UP under Obama (from a whopping 1% of media coverage during the last 2 years of Bush's Presidency).

LOL, Yurtsie!
 
How 'bout that? The cover story on cnn.com right now - front & center - is an interactive look at the 6,000 war casualties from Iraq & Afghanistan.

Crazy; I thought they didn't do that under Obama!
 
Onceler said:
How 'bout that? The cover story on cnn.com right now - front & center - is an interactive look at the 6,000 war casualties from Iraq & Afghanistan.

Crazy; I thought they didn't do that under Obama!
Click to expand...

LOL....after HOURS and HOURS of searching....onceler finally gets ONE hit
 
Yurt said:
LOL....after HOURS and HOURS of searching....onceler finally gets ONE hit
Click to expand...

Ah, no - it wasn't "searching." It was on the cover of CNN.

As for the searching, I posted the 2 links above, which you ignored. That was the searching part.
 
what is truly sad for dunceler is that he doesn't even realize what day it is....

its memorial day....big shocker a news station would talk about "memorials" on a day like this

major fail onceler, and really, quite embarrassing...you should just quit now
 
Yurt said:
and of course memorial day is over and so is CNN "coverage" on the front page

what an embarrassing fail for onceler
Click to expand...

You really are a glutton for punishment, Yurtsie.

I don't suppose you'd care to address the other links I posted? You know - the one where it said that Afghanistan war coverage - which you said was blaring in the headlines under Bush - was 1% of total coverage in 2007 & 2008, and actually went up in 2009 after Obama took office?

Or, the other one, where studies showed a full 1/3 drop in coverage of both wars in the summer of 2007, and even further reduction in the beginning of 2008?

I posted the CNN link because the timing was pretty funny. I love how you keep running from the other 2, though...Yurtsie!
:clink:
 
i've debunked your links numerous times....you're just a hack how can't admit he is wrong...you've posted those links for months now and i'm honestly tired of debunking the same crap everytime you repost them as if they are "new" links....

you got all excited that cnn had something on the front page....forgetting it was memorial day....now of course it is magically no longer "news"

how embarrassing onceler
 
"i've debunked your links numerous times"

LOL - I must have missed that. I also must have missed that I have posted them for months now; the one w/ the 1% figure is a new find.

And it's interesting how I have all of the facts and links in this little "debate," and all you have is ad homs and "only a fool thinks that."

This is endlessly entertaining, Yurtsie. You should probably leave this thread alone now, but the smart money is on you bumping it again....
 
no surprise dunceler continues his homosexually intimate name for me (creepy) and of course no one here is surprised he can't admit he is wrong....he simply is too dishonest for that....and now any further discussion with him on this topic will be simply running in circles

(yawn)
 
the libtards that were bitching under bush are ball-less so they shut thier pie holes for Obama the warhawk!!!
 
Yurt said:
no surprise dunceler continues his homosexually intimate name for me (creepy) and of course no one here is surprised he can't admit he is wrong....he simply is too dishonest for that....and now any further discussion with him on this topic will be simply running in circles

(yawn)
Click to expand...


As Yurtsie waves the white flag! Nice going.

It will proabably only be a day or 2 of you hiding from this until you try another post of "where is the outrage now?"

LOL

:cof1:
 
Yurt said:
only a fool would deny the facts, any 5 year old can turn on the tv, internet, open newspapers and see the reality

dunceler apparently cannot do any of those things...probably still hungover after his wild night with his boyfriend dumber than all y all
Click to expand...


What Yurtsie wrote: "only a fool would deny the facts..."

What he really meant: "No, I don't have any facts to back up my earlier claims."

Why doesn't Spurtsie abide by the same rules he expects others to follow?
 
this is hilarious...i now have three homosexually obsessed fans who love calling me yurtsie....

keep up "boys"....your flames are burning brighter each day :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top