And, your point is...?Against a man!
Are u saying women are inferior? Yup u just did thatAgainst a man!
Women are inferiorAnd, your point is...?
No, I’m saying Trumppers think they are.Are u saying women are inferior? Yup u just did that
Yet each time you were convinced those women would win.Women have more prejudices to overcome in a presidential election than men. He can only win when his opponent has such a handicap.
BULLSHITNo, I’m saying Trumppers think they are.
They even removed a man and hand picked a woman...so the idiots thought a man that was sharp as a tack couldn't beat himYet each time you were convinced those women would win.
A poor sample in this case. You had one being a Hell spawned demon, the other a vegetable. A sample of just 2 isn't great to start with.Women are inferior
Maybe running a woman that isn'tWomen have more prejudices to overcome in a presidential election than men. He can only win when his opponent has such a handicap.
Both times they were clearly the better candidateYet each time you were convinced those women would win.
You were never a lawyer.Against a man!
Lawyers aren't human.You were never a lawyer.
They almost won with the "Hell spawned demon"... It's possible we may want to stop running octogenarians in either party.Maybe running a woman that isn't
A Hell spawned demon
Moron
Insane
Clueless
would help with that.
That would be a good idea. I think maximum age limits are needed.They almost won with the "Hell spawned demon"... It's possible we may want to stop running octogenarians in either party.
Isn't that the purpose of your drivel?I love how pissed you TACOS are over my post.
So if someone says a male pool player has never won against a man...never mind u are a stupid fucking IDIOTNo, I’m saying Trumppers think they are.