I saw your other post after I posted the question. You get it.
Let's hear from Yurtsie.
Great job Hillary...
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.2
- Start date
I saw your other post after I posted the question. You get it.
Let's hear from Yurtsie.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
No worries. Though you twits might have mentioned that the sanctions agreement was announced TODAY. Instead you made me read that trashy tabloid to find out.
The authors (the WSJ editorial board) are neo-con war-mongering shitheads. Rather than waiting to see the impact on the deal on negotiations with Russia and China, they declare defeat and decide that war is the only real option. They're disgusting pukes. Stop taking them seriously.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
We get it... you don't like the WSJ editorial board. Bottom line, they reported based on what they knew at the time.
Can you honestly say you would have thought China and Russia would have gotten on board with more sanctions given their constant reluctance in the past and given the gesture (albeit a small one) of the deal by Iran?
Like I stated, I will wait to see what this round of sanctions looks like and whether or not it actually is implemented.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
ALL THREE PRIOR ROUNDS FAILED....geeee, what a stretch to believe the 4th round would also fail....and like i said...we shall see if this actually works
I can honestly say that only idiot puke war-mongering shitheads like the WSJ editorial board and their fellow neo-con travelers immediately jump to the conclusion that because the deal was reached, negotiations with Russia and China are pointless, Obama's months of effort were all for naught and that Israel will have to seriously consider blowing shit up.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
really...its a success? it has worked and the agreement ratified by all parties? like i said, there is no success YET
if the agreement gets ratified and works, then there is success
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
what has happened at this point? do we actually have sanctions? do we have a signed agreement? have the sanctions worked?
answer = no
you can't accept reality, i understand, this is your dems and you must do anything to cheer them
and look how great sanctions worked for iraq
So, Yurtsie - you'd skip this new round of sanctions and jump right to military action, would you?
and look how great sanctions worked for iraq
Yes, actually, the sanctions worked well to achieve their desired purpose. Iraq had no WMD, remember?
Jackass.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
so you want the same sanctions on iran? and no, the sanctions didn't work you dumbass....all it did was fill saddam's coffers
if we want iran to comply, then we have to offer them something or else it is in fact goign to take military action....and why is it we are allowed nuclear weapons but iran is not?
Sanctions did work in Iraq, Yurtsie. Saddam did NOT have WMD's; that was the main point, ya know.
And you're still avoiding the question - are you advocating forgoing further sanctions, and jumping right to military intervention?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
who is Yurtsie? onceler keeps talking to some imaginary person...i know he has issues, but good lord, talking to an imaginary person repeatedly on a messageboard....get help
The purpose of the sanctions was to ensure that Iraq didn't have any WMD. And Iraq didn't have any WMD. They worked to achieve their purpose, although they were less than perfect.
Hahahaha - no alternative to what Hillary & Obama are doing. Just criticism.
Figured, Yurtsie.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
you don't know if he had them while the inspectors were out....we still don't know if they weren't moved out of country before the invasion...fact is they apparently weren't there by the time we go there...
why is it we are allowed nukes and they are not? there is no agreement to end a war with them like we had with iraq, so comparing the two is utterly retarded...iraq was a completely different situation, they capitulated because of military action, the sanctions existed because of military action
its embarrassing to watch you fail like this nigel
"you don't know if he had them while the inspectors were out....we still don't know if they weren't moved out of country before the invasion...fact is they apparently weren't there by the time we go there..."
Ah, yes - the ol' "The UN must have failed and Bush had to be right because there was a remote chance the WMD's were moved before invasion" apologism.
There is always some spin...
Ah, yes - the ol' "The UN must have failed and Bush had to be right because there was a remote chance the WMD's were moved before invasion" apologism.
There is always some spin...