GHF proves IDF did not shoot at innocent Gazans at aid distribution sites

[moon]

Cowardly scumsac ^


Haw, haw............................................haw.

 

[IBDaMann]

The UK and France are sworn to recognize it later this year-

Will that recognition on their part make something appear somewhere that isn't there now?

along with the 148 countries that already do.

Apparently their recognition doesn't amount to much.

 

[moon]

It is a somewhat common misconception that the General Assembly can somehow overrule the Security Council. However, if the General Assembly could overrule the Security Council, all votes would therefore occur in the General Assembly.

The Security Council is the final word and cannot be overruled. The General Assembly has almost no authority and is essentially powerless. All power lies in the Security Council.

Let's adhere to your pre-wriggle statement. ^

Haw, haw.................................haw.

Wanna change it , split-tongue ?

Haw, haw...................................haw.

 

[moon]

Hey, dance some more for the audience.

Haw, haw............................................haw.

 

[ZenMode]

I'm curious, why do you say this? Is it because you allow others to do your thinking for you and you regurgitate as ordered? ... or do you not know what a terrorist organization is?


Nope. You can't cite a single example of Hamas ever attacking anyone. All you can do is cite Iran's proxies (who do not include Hamas) attacking Israel.


That was Hezbollah. Maybe if you understood the situation more, you wouldn't feel inclined to run cover for Zionist terrorists and blame civilian administrators for the deeds of terrorists.

Why are you running cover for seemingly all terrorists?

You create your own reality And then you make the rules of the game such that there is no way to prove you wrong. All you have to do is read about the history of Gaza, as it relates to Hamas, to know that they have been operating as a terrorist organization inside Gaza for decades.

But, again, you set the rules so that links to any source that poses you are not legitimate. You are crazy. You have lost touch with reality a number of ways and there is literally no way, because of the rules you have set, to bring you back to reality.

 

[moon]

You create your own reality And then you make the rules of the game such that there is no way to prove you wrong. All you have to do is read about the history of Gaza, as it relates to Hamas, to know that they have been operating as a terrorist organization inside Gaza for decades.

The invaded cannot be the terrorists, dumbass- that's the invaders. The defenders have the right to self defense.

 

[moon]

Where's the wriggling coward got to ?

 

[moon]

Aw- shall we let him off the hook, folks ?

Haw, haw.................................................haw.

 

[Damocles]

Says the dude who thinks there is a country called Palestine.

And that it somehow existed before the Romans called it Palestine in 135 CE.

The Forgotten History of the Term "Palestine"

Some think of the Palestinian-Israeli dispute as a clash of nationalisms. Others stress religious antagonism, while others yet see an East-West power struggle. But it is roundly agreed upon that a key element of the conflict is land. That land, for many years by many people, was called...

www.hudson.org

The Romans, specifically Emperor Hadrian renamed the land of Israel to Palestine in 135 CE after crushing the Bar Kokhba Revolt. The reason was to erase the Jewish connection to the land and to symbolize Roman dominance, particularly after the Jewish revolt. The name "Palestine" was derived from the ancient Philistines, who were the enemies of the ancient Israelites.

Even the name he uses for the area was racism.

 

[IBDaMann]

Hey, dance some more for the audience. Haw, haw............................................haw.

I knew you would backpedal. You obviously got caught and now you need a way to blame others for your obvious ignorance and save face.

So, now you acknowledge that the General Assembly cannot override the Security Council.

 

[IBDaMann]

You create your own reality

This isn't an answer to my question. This is your standard EVASION when you are wrong and get called out.

And then you make the rules of the game such

I did not invent either the rules of logic or the English language. At least I learned the rules of logic and the English language at some point.

that there is no way to prove you wrong.

At least not that you are going to be able to do.

All you have to do is read about the history of Gaza,

All you have to do is learn to be honest.

as it relates to Hamas,

I already know it. If you had ever learned any of their history, you'd know that Hamas is not Al Qassam. As it stands, you conflate the two, specifically because other people order you to do so. You are stupid that way, but we've already been over this many times.

to know that they have been operating as a terrorist organization inside Gaza for decades.

Like I said, you think Hamas is Al Qassam. Everything you say on the matter is wrong.

 

[EdwinA]

Gaza's administrators have never had any money nor any military.

Yeah, cuz all those thousands of rockets they've fired over the years, Aks and other stuff they collect are really just Filipinos and Brazillians acting up.

 

[IBDaMann]

And that it somehow existed before the Romans called it Palestine in 135 CE.

I am aware that there were Philistines from Philistia and then Philistine. The Arabic word for Palestine is still Philistine. The Hebrew word for Palestine has been Peleshet forever. Only in English has it changed from Philistia/Philistine to Palestine/Palestinian.

So, in the past tense, there was a Palestine. In the present tense, there is no Palestine. It would be the same thing if a group of people claimed to be Carolingians. Sure, there was a Carolingian Empire ... in the past, but not anymore.

The Romans, specifically Emperor Hadrian renamed the land of Israel to Palestine in 135 CE ... The name "Palestine" was derived from the ancient Philistines, who were the enemies of the ancient Israelites. Even the name he uses for the area was racism.

How was that racism?

 

[Damocles]

I am aware that there were Philistines from Philistia and then Philistine. The Arabic word for Palestine is still Philistine. The Hebrew word for Palestine has been Peleshet forever. Only in English has it changed from Philistia/Philistine to Palestine/Palestinian.

So, in the past tense, there was a Palestine. In the present tense, there is no Palestine. It would be the same thing if a group of people claimed to be Carolingians. Sure, there was a Carolingian Empire ... in the past, but not anymore.


How was that racism?

You don't think forcing conquered people into your mold and trying to erase their connection to the land you conquered is racism? It's as racist today as when folks chant "from the river to the sea"... ignorant of the racist and ethnic cleansing that is inherent in the chant. It was racist when the US conquered the west and took kids away from their parents to be taught in schools that ignored their heritage.

 

[ZenMode]

This isn't an answer to my question. This is your standard EVASION when you are wrong and get called out.


I did not invent either the rules of logic or the English language. At least I learned the rules of logic and the English language at some point.


At least not that you are going to be able to do.


All you have to do is learn to be honest.


I already know it. If you had ever learned any of their history, you'd know that Hamas is not Al Qassam. As it stands, you conflate the two, specifically because other people order you to do so. You are stupid that way, but we've already been over this many times.


Like I said, you think Hamas is Al Qassam. Everything you say on the matter is wrong.

Provide your source for any of your claims. Show me what you got if you're not crazy and making shit up.

A link, a video, a book... The choice is 100% yours. Let's see it if you aren't just another butter conspiracy theorist who gets your information from other nutter butter conspiracy theorist.

 

[ZenMode]

This isn't an answer to my question. This is your standard EVASION when you are wrong and get called out.


I did not invent either the rules of logic or the English language. At least I learned the rules of logic and the English language at some point.


At least not that you are going to be able to do.


All you have to do is learn to be honest.


I already know it. If you had ever learned any of their history, you'd know that Hamas is not Al Qassam. As it stands, you conflate the two, specifically because other people order you to do so. You are stupid that way, but we've already been over this many times.


Like I said, you think Hamas is Al Qassam. Everything you say on the matter is wrong.

Al qassam, as I've said repeatedly, is the military arm of Hamas.

 

[ZenMode]

The invaded cannot be the terrorists, dumbass-

Why?

that's the invaders. The defenders have the right to self defense.

You're drunk, right?

 

[Into the Night]

Iran attacked Israel, through their proxy Al Qassam. Iran has been the only attacker of Israel since 1979. Your insistence that broke Gazan administrators, and not Al Qassam, somehow attacked Israel is absurd. Hamas, civilian administrators, never attacked anyone ... and you know it. Al Qassam is the militant terrorist organization that is hell bent on destroying Israel at the behest of Iran ... and you know it. Why you decide to become a blatant liar on this issue is beyond me, but lying is all you've been doing.

Have you yet found any images of "Hamas fighters" that aren't actually Al Qassam soldiers? Of course not. Lie. Lie. Lie.

Now you've gone back to Iran again, eh? Hamas attacked Israel. You are still locked in these paradoxes. You can't argue both sides of any paradox.

 

[Into the Night]

Dead people can't be told anything.


They did. Hamas was a political party that grew out of a charitable organization.

Thuggery and war is not a charitable organization.

 

[Into the Night]

You create your own reality

Go learn what 'reality' means and how it's defined, Void. Of course he creates his own reality, just you create your own reality, just as I create my own reality.

On 2nd thought, I know you won't, since you deny and discard philosophy.