Hegseth hosts first meeting of what he says will be a monthly Christian prayer service at Pentagon

I see you didn't read my latest post that shows a black woman being saved by Donald Trump from committing suicide. If you do see the video of that black woman crying, and in a desperate mindset to kill herself--being saved by Donald Trump, then perhaps you'll change your ignorant tune
that Trump is amoral.
Mostly I've seen your hatred of anyone left of Alt-Right, Hater. That goes contrary to Christian beliefs and the #1 reason why I know you are either a liar or a very, very delusional dumbass.
 
I do help children in poverty, and I also help pregnant women to go full speed ahead to give birth to their children to be by trying my best to
stop these people killing abortion pills. Again, what do you do as a non Christian to help provide for children in poverty? One thing I do to help children in poverty is that I voted for Trump, who is the man that will get our economy rolling again which will help those living in poverty.
Why would anyone believe a liar who consistently paints everyone left of them as the enemy?
 
MAGA isn't a person, Phanty. Inversion fallacies don't work. You can't blame your problems on anybody else.

You have already posted your disdain for Christianity. You don't believe in Jesus, Phanty.

RQAA. Go back and read it.

Illegal aliens are not refugees, Phanty.

That causes children to be murdered in their classrooms. You hate children. You support murdering them before they are born, you support mutiliation of them over 'gender', and you support putting them in classrooms and not allowing anyone to defend them due to your 'gun free' zones.

You hate children. You have already posted your disdain for Jesus Christ.

Shoot back.

I don't treat sexual perversions with dignity, Phanty. You hate women as well. You even hate yourself.

Sexual perversion is not a right, Phanty.

It is obvious Democrats want to increase poverty. They support organized crime and the drug trade. They support the slave trade. They support policies that create the homeless and put them on drugs.

And you have already posted your disdain for Jesus Christ.

What convicted criminal???
People DID speak out against the corrupt in the WH trying to destroy this country. That's why Trump got elected.
Random words. No apparent coherency.
 
Hearsay is admissible in court, so long as it is presented as hearsay evidence.

No exemptions.

Yes it is, so long as it is submitted as hearsay evidence.

The Bible is not in court (other than something to swear by).

The Bible is not on trial in court.

Sketchy is an opinion, but you are correct that the Bible is not a proof. It is evidence only.
*sigh*

Now you are just repeating wrong information. Repetition fallacy. Do better.

What I have told you is correct. Hearsay of hearsay would never be admissible, and first hand hearsay only in specified exemptions. So what we'll do is give you a link to a prosecutor information page... you know, the pros. Maybe you'll listen to them rather than just deny in a repetition fallacy.

-----------------------------------------------------

Pay attention to rule 802.

Rule 802 – Hearsay Not Admissible - Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by statute or by these rules.

B. Legal Overview​

Evidence is “hearsay” if it is a statement (that is, an “assertion,” either oral or written), made by the declarant (i.e., the person who made the statement) at any time or place other than while testifying in court at the current trial or hearing, and the statement is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. See, G.S. 8C-801, 802; State v. Burke, 343 N.C. 129 (1996). For example, if a trial witness such as a law enforcement officer attempted to testify about what an eyewitness at the scene of the crime said that he or she saw, and that statement was offered to establish that the events transpired as the witness reported, the statement would be inadmissible hearsay unless another statute or rule authorized the admission of the statement. See State v. Banks, 210 N.C. App. 30 (2011).

------------------------------------------------------------------

It goes on to describe places where it is allowed, but the reality is, hearsay is almost always inadmissible. Let alone someone writing about hearsay, which is what we have in this case. Again, this is "evidence" but it is extremely weak evidence that would never be allowed in court. And IMHO, it is unconvincing evidence.

The weakness of the evidence definitively requires faith to "believe" in these reports. Especially when it is, as I said, a report that says that the person was only visible to his own followers, even if (as they do in the article) they claim that this is a miracle and strong "evidence".

The written reports of what someone who was not there told the author that "500 witnesses" said would not be admissible in court.
 
Nanny software, Nifty?
Most likely that Christian Nation SCOTUS Rehnquist Bicentennial Fourth Reich July as those West Point Trumpanzees Trumpanazis Trumpamengele “Angel of Death” Christiananality pedophilia of human reproduction medical pseudoscience paired with being deemed God’s chosen people to continue suicidal super egos survival of the fittest fascists as those Islamidiotocracy flaming flying chariot pseudoscience “death to the infidels” pedophilia Valhalla…..
 
I see you didn't read my latest post that shows a black woman being saved by Donald Trump from committing suicide. If you do see the video of that black woman crying, and in a desperate mindset to kill herself--being saved by Donald Trump, then perhaps you'll change your ignorant tune
that Trump is amoral.

You believe in the craziest shit. You worship "Donald Trump" more than you do your god.
 
She's not. She already mentioned the expensive TRUMP watches. Isn't a watch a kind of bracelet?
There, add that into the image and you'd have a set! See? Easy-peasy...

I'll bet there are MAGA bracelets though.

Something like this?
il_794xN.6726759453_225d.jpg
 
??

Yes, there are -- @Eagle_Eye is one of them. What does that have to do with my reply to LibHater?
You say: No, you hate everyone not a MAGAT. Your very screen name says so

His screen name is LibHater... According to you there are some conservatives that are not "MAGAT"s, therefore his screen name does not say that he hates everyone that is not a "MAGAT"...

I think the logic follows.
 
No, you hate everyone not a MAGAT. Your very screen name says so.

When you and your fellow faux Xtians start demonstrating Jesus's teachings by providing for children in poverty without bitching about it, THEN and only then may you virtue-signal about the unborn. Until then, you're nothing more than a lip-service Xtian wanting to control women and force them to give birth.
Agreed. Anyone who claims to be Christian yet preaches hate and spreads lies is not a Christian.
 
You say: No, you hate everyone not a MAGAT. Your very screen name says so

His screen name is LibHater... According to you there are some conservatives that are not "MAGAT"s, therefore his screen name does not say that he hates everyone that is not a "MAGAT"...

I think the logic follows.

Betcha anything if EE showed up and challenged Libhater on his TrumpWorship, Libhater would hate him too. Well, not anything. lol
 
Back
Top