Three U.S. citizens, ages 2, 4 and 7, swiftly deported from Louisiana

If the legal father was right there, why would there be a need for a hearing?
OMFG. If aren't even aware of the most basic of facts you should probably not post and reveal you are an idiot.
The father wasn't there when they were arrested. He didn't need to be there for the meeting she went to. Then they didn't let her contact him after they arrested her so she couldn't tell him to come and pick up the child. Then they deported her and the US citizen child before his claims could even be heard.
 
If the father wants the kid to stay here and the mother is OK with it fine let her stay but if the mother wants the child with her then a judge should decide which is best for the child.
Exactly.

American children are separated from their parents everyday when their parents are sent to prison.

These far left loons want better treatment for illegals than for our own homegrown criminals.
 
OMFG. If aren't even aware of the most basic of facts you should probably not post and reveal you are an idiot.
The father wasn't there when they were arrested. He didn't need to be there for the meeting she went to. Then they didn't let her contact him after they arrested her so she couldn't tell him to come and pick up the child. Then they deported her and the US citizen child before his claims could even be heard.
Ok...How did they get to the meeting? I could be wrong about it being mom's partner and the father...let me know if I am, and I will certainly acknowledge that I was wrong... But the children didn't need to be there....and obviously, should not have been...
Mom put them in jeopardy every day by being illegally in this country...
 
Ok...How did they get to the meeting? I could be wrong about it being mom's partner and the father...let me know if I am, and I will certainly acknowledge that I was wrong... But the children didn't need to be there....and obviously, should not have been...
Mom put them in jeopardy every day by being illegally in this country...
It was a scheduled meeting. Wow. I doubt you ever worked with children or parents if you don't know that on a work day, one parent will bring the young children with them while the other parent goes to work.

What jeopardy were the children in? Attacks from Trump supporters? Children are not supposed to be in jeopardy from government agents. They certainly aren't supposed to be deported if they are US citizens.
 
(1) Expedited removal under INA § 235(b)(1) - The following aliens are subject to “expedited removal” under INA § 235(b)(1):

  • those arriving at a port of entry without valid identity or travel documents, as required, or with fraudulent documents;
  • those interdicted at sea (in international or U.S. waters) and brought to the United States;
  • those paroled into the United States after April 1, 1997, and whose parole has since been terminated;
  • those who did not arrive by sea, who are apprehended anywhere in the United States more than 100 air miles from a U.S. international land border, and who have been continuously present in the United States for less than two years; and
  • those who did not arrive by sea, who are apprehended within 100 air miles from a U.S. international land border, and who have been continuously present in the United States for at least 14 days but for less than two years.
Each alien placed in expedited removal under this designation bears the affirmative burden to show to the satisfaction of an immigration officer that the alien has been present in the United States continuously for the relevant period.

DUE PROCESS.
 
Indeed.

These illegal terrorists are now the face of the Democratic Party.

They own them.
^^^
Satanic mammon-worshipers lie about American citizen cancer kid being a terrorist. Having Trump's border czar lie about the circumstances is bad enough but refusing them lawyers and Due Process is anti-Constitutional.

MAGAts are heartless racists and anti-Christian. When Trump declares martial law before the Midterms, I hope the Resistance puts them down like rabid dogs.

Three young children who are US citizens - including one with cancer - were deported to Honduras alongside their mothers last week, according to advocacy groups and the families' lawyers.

One of the children is a four-year-old with Stage 4 cancer who was sent without medication, a lawyer for the child's family said.

Donald Trump's border czar Tom Homan said the mothers had made the choice for their citizen children to be removed with them. "Having a US citizen child does not make you immune from our laws," he said, adding the mothers were in the US illegally.

Trump faced a backlash during his first term for a policy that separated thousands of children from their parents.

On Friday, New Orleans Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials deported the two mothers and three children aged two, four, and seven, to Honduras from Louisiana, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in a statement.

The two families - including one pregnant mother - had lived in the US for years and were "deported from the U.S. under deeply troubling circumstances that raise serious due process concerns", the ACLU said.


One of the US citizen children who was removed was suffering from metastatic cancer and was deported without the ability to consult with doctors, the advocacy group alleged.

Speaking to reporters at a news conference on Monday morning, Homan said deporting families together was better than separating them.

"We're keeping families together," he said. "What we did was remove children with their mothers who requested the children depart with them. There's a parental decision."

Homan dismissed the use of the word "deported" to describe the removal of the children from the country.

"They weren't deported. We don't deport US citizens. Their parents made that decision, not the United States government," he said.

Last week, a federal judge said he had a "strong suspicion" that one of the children deported to Honduras, a two-year-old citizen, - was sent away with "no meaningful process".

The Louisiana-born child and her family members were apprehended during a routine appointment at a New Orleans immigration office on 22 April, according to court documents.

Homan, in an interview with CBS Face the Nation on Sunday, said "the judge was due process", adding that the two-year-old's mother "had due process at great taxpayer expense and was ordered by an immigration judge after those hearings, so she had due process."

A hearing has been scheduled in the case for 19 May for the government to address whether the family was given due process.

The second family was detained on 24 April, when ICE refused to respond to their attorneys' and family members' requests to contact them, the ACLU said.
 
(1) Expedited removal under INA § 235(b)(1) - The following aliens are subject to “expedited removal” under INA § 235(b)(1):

  • those arriving at a port of entry without valid identity or travel documents, as required, or with fraudulent documents;
  • those interdicted at sea (in international or U.S. waters) and brought to the United States;
  • those paroled into the United States after April 1, 1997, and whose parole has since been terminated;
  • those who did not arrive by sea, who are apprehended anywhere in the United States more than 100 air miles from a U.S. international land border, and who have been continuously present in the United States for less than two years; and
  • those who did not arrive by sea, who are apprehended within 100 air miles from a U.S. international land border, and who have been continuously present in the United States for at least 14 days but for less than two years.
Each alien placed in expedited removal under this designation bears the affirmative burden to show to the satisfaction of an immigration officer that the alien has been present in the United States continuously for the relevant period.

DUE PROCESS.
^^^
Supports deporting cancer kids.

Fuck you, Oath-Breaker. I hope your family knows what a piece of shit you've turned into.
 
Ms. Fat Lame is a White Christian Nationalist which means she's not a Christian, just a White Nationalist.

The Republican Party has devolved into a white Christian nationalist party.

A majority of Republicans today qualify as either Christian nationalism Adherents (20%) or Sympathizers (33%), compared to less than one quarter of independents (6% Adherents and 16% Sympathizers) and less than one fifth of Democrats (5% Adherents and 11% Sympathizers). These views are reinforced by TV media outlets consumed disproportionately by Republicans, such as Fox News or far-right TV news outlets such as OAN and Newsmax....

...Support for Christian nationalism is strongly correlated to support for political violence, at both the national and state levels.

At the violent January 6 insurrection after Trump’s 2020 loss, we saw a disturbing number of Christian symbols intermingled with Trump flags, Confederate flags and other white supremacist symbols. We see the connection between Christian nationalism and support for political violence clearly in the data.

Nearly four in 10 Christian nationalism Adherents (38%) and nearly three in 10 Sympathizers (28%) agree that “because things have gotten so far off track, true American patriots may have to resort to violence to save the country,” compared with only 15% of Skeptics and 7% of Rejecters.

The relationship between Christian nationalist views and support for political violence is also strong at the state level, especially among white Americans....

.....White Christian nationalism is neither the best of us, nor the majority of us.

At the dawn of a second Trump administration, the threat white Christian nationalism poses to the promise of multiracial, multifaith democracy is plainer than ever. Over the last two years, PRRI has documented the connections between support for Christian nationalism and support for a host of opinions that are corrosive to a pluralistic democracy: anti-Black attitudes and denials of the existence of systemic racism, harsh anti-immigrant attitudes, anti-Muslim attitudes, antisemitic attitudes, support for patriarchal gender roles, and anti-LGBTQ attitudes just to name a few.

White Christian nationalism is certainly not the best of who we are as Americans or, for those of us who understand ourselves to be followers of Jesus, the best of who we are as Christians. But these new PRRI data show white Christian nationalism also is not the majority of us. If we’re going to save our democracy from Trump’s MAGA crusade, we’ll have to find a way to make the power of what is truly the American moral majority felt.
Until you go and look at their methodology.


Here's how they determined whether someone is a " white Christian nationalist" or not:

  • The U.S. government should declare America a Christian nation.
  • U.S. laws should be based on Christian values.
  • If the U.S. moves away from our Christian foundations, we will not have a country anymore.
  • Being Christian is an important part of being truly American.
  • God has called Christians to exercise dominion over all areas of American society.
For each question the respondent could select, completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree, or completely disagree. There was no neutral answer so each respondent was forced into a yes / no, positive / negative answer. A score of 1 to 0 was awarded in .25 increments from completely agree (a 1) to completely disagree (0).

That's it. That's their whole survey. What a complete load of bullshit that is.
 
[/QUOTE]
It was a scheduled meeting. Wow. I doubt you ever worked with children or parents if you don't know that on a work day, one parent will bring the young children with them while the other parent goes to work.

What jeopardy were the children in? Attacks from Trump supporters? Children are not supposed to be in jeopardy from government agents. They certainly aren't supposed to be deported if they are US citizens.
I taught for 30 years...I've worked with many children and parents... You make arrangements for your children...unless there is an emergency, they should not be there...
The children are living with an illegal...Who might be deported at any time...as happened... The children were not deported... if the legal father was at work, all they had to do was keep the children there until he could picked them up...children's services could have stepped in temporarily...
 
I taught for 30 years...I've worked with many children and parents... You make arrangements for your children...unless there is an emergency, they should not be there...
The children are living with an illegal...Who might be deported at any time...as happened... The children were not deported...
In 30 years every time you had a parent teacher conference both parents always showed up and none of those parents ever brought an infant or a toddler with them? I find that hard to believe. Are you in the late stages of dementia since you don't remember that ever happening?

The children were deported when they were sent out of the country with their mother. The claim they were not deported is nothing but an attempt to deny reality.
 
In 30 years every time you had a parent teacher conference both parents always showed up and none of those parents ever brought an infant or a toddler with them? I find that hard to believe. Are you in the late stages of dementia since you don't remember that ever happening?

The children were deported when they were sent out of the country with their mother. The claim they were not deported is nothing but an attempt to deny reality.
Absolutely not...but parent-teacher conferences are completely different... There's a place for a younger children and students to go...IEP meetings the same...... I've had student bring their infants and toddlers to class, though.. ;)... but again...completely different circumstances... Not a meeting
To evaluate illegal status... The children were not deported... they traveled with the mother to her home...at her request.... Suggesting dementia is Pretty classy... I understand its tough to be a Democrat right now but really? ;)
 
Last edited:
Those kids were serious threat to Repubs and Trumpys. They all breathed a sigh of relief when they were deported. You have to factor in how bad it is to live in terror from such threatening people. Tonight, they will sleep better.

And one holy white REAL American child with cancer will get the treatment denied to her because it was going to some dirty brown illegal kid who doesn't really belong here no matter what that Constitution thing says. *eyeroll*
 
(1) Expedited removal under INA § 235(b)(1) - The following aliens are subject to “expedited removal” under INA § 235(b)(1):

  • those arriving at a port of entry without valid identity or travel documents, as required, or with fraudulent documents;
  • those interdicted at sea (in international or U.S. waters) and brought to the United States;
  • those paroled into the United States after April 1, 1997, and whose parole has since been terminated;
  • those who did not arrive by sea, who are apprehended anywhere in the United States more than 100 air miles from a U.S. international land border, and who have been continuously present in the United States for less than two years; and
  • those who did not arrive by sea, who are apprehended within 100 air miles from a U.S. international land border, and who have been continuously present in the United States for at least 14 days but for less than two years.
Each alien placed in expedited removal under this designation bears the affirmative burden to show to the satisfaction of an immigration officer that the alien has been present in the United States continuously for the relevant period.

DUE PROCESS.
Interesting. Can you tell us how far New Orleans is from the nearest land border? Can you also tell us if 2025 is more then 2 years after 2021?

It seems that you have just provided evidence that due process was not provided since what you provided was violated.
 
Until you go and look at their methodology.


Here's how they determined whether someone is a " white Christian nationalist" or not:

  • The U.S. government should declare America a Christian nation.
  • U.S. laws should be based on Christian values.
  • If the U.S. moves away from our Christian foundations, we will not have a country anymore.
  • Being Christian is an important part of being truly American.
  • God has called Christians to exercise dominion over all areas of American society.
For each question the respondent could select, completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree, or completely disagree. There was no neutral answer so each respondent was forced into a yes / no, positive / negative answer. A score of 1 to 0 was awarded in .25 increments from completely agree (a 1) to completely disagree (0).

That's it. That's their whole survey. What a complete load of bullshit that is.
Soooo....you hate Baptists too. Awesome but unsurprising coming from a White Nationalist.

Hundreds of evangelical Christian leaders signed a letter this week decrying "Christian Nationalism” as “heretical and antithetical to the teachings of Jesus,” saying it played a role in the storming of the U.S. Capitol last month.

Over 400 pastors and faith leaders signed a lengthy letter released Wednesday on saynotochristiannationalism.org that describes Christian nationalism as "a version of American nationalism that is trying to camouflage itself as Christianity.”

"Over the centuries, there are moments when the Church, the trans-national Body of Christ-followers, has seen distortions of the faith that warranted a response. In ages past, the Church has responded by holding emergency councils in order to unilaterally denounce mutations of the Christian faith, and to affirm the core values at the heart of Christianity," the evangelical leaders wrote.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top