IBDaMann
Well-known member
The j operator is not defined as the square root of any negative value; that would be bad math.What about the J operator?????
The j operator is not defined as the square root of any negative value; that would be bad math.What about the J operator?????
Who are "they"? Hockey fans?Hence why they're called imaginary numbers..
Did you have anything intelligent to contribute?"What we have here is a case of a mathematically incompetent moron (you) who is too stupid to learn"
This statement sure shows like you, who knows absolutely nothing about the math is is used in electronics, and calling others moron.,
Poor sarcasm. Sqrt(-1) is called imaginary number for a reason.Who are "they"? Hockey fans?
Do you?Did you have anything intelligent to contribute?
Nope. There are no numbers that are square roots of negative values.Sqrt(-1) is called imaginary number for a reason.
Again, sqrt(-1) is a solution to x^2 + 1 = 0. It is called imaginary number.Nope. There are no numbers that are square roots of negative values.
Why haven't you bothered to learn the mathematical proof confirming that this is the case?
Nope. Do you see that square root of -1 you have there? You can't do that. Sorry.Again, sqrt(-1) is a solution to x^2 + 1 = 0. It is called imaginary number.
And yet it is used in math. You cannot get around that fact.Nope. Do you see that square root of -1 you have there? You can't do that. Sorry.
Nope. It is not. Do you remember when you claimed to have a math degree? Too funny.And yet it is used in math.
Again, sqrt(-1) is called imaginary number. Sqrt(-1)^2 = -1.Nope. It is not. Do you remember when you claimed to have a math degree? Too funny.
You are the one who is too intellectually dishonest to research and learn the mathematical proof that renders it invalid.
Again, you are wasting bandwidth. In all this time you could have independently verified the proof that says it all.Again, [chanting of his favorite math error omitted]
Again, sqrt(-1) is called imaginary number. Of course it doesn't exist in the real set. It's a concept that works well and has applications.Again, you are wasting bandwidth. In all this time you could have independently verified the proof that says it all.
Learning disabled is not characteristic of all deaf people, right?
Again, it is not. You can't take the square root of negative numbers. Sorry. I didn't realize that your learning disability was so severe.Again, sqrt(-1) is called imaginary number.
i extends the real number line to the complex plane. it is defined as the number that, when squared, equals -1. Notice that there is no square root involved in that definition.Of course it doesn't exist in the real set.
No math errors work well and none have any applications.It's a concept that works well and has applications.
I made an observation about you. Your thinking that you are deaf people (plural) shows that you are lost in your strawberry safe space.Insulting deaf people indicates that you have tipped your king.
Then what is the j operator?????The j operator is not defined as the square root of any negative value; that would be bad math.
OMG, you really are intellectually marooned.Did you have anything intelligent to contribute?
The word "imaginary" is an unfortunate relic from the 18th century when it wasn't yet widely accepted that i and the associated complex numbers were mathematically valid and had real tangible application.Again, sqrt(-1) is a solution to x^2 + 1 = 0. It is called imaginary number.
Quite simple. Did Dum-dum school make you dumber?