Apply the questions always

Diogenes

Nemo me impune lacessit
GjigeP7XMAAK2jt
 
Taxpayers having the power to direct their taxes to areas they want funded has been talked about for decades. It was dismissed every time because it would not work. Try thinking things through.

What made you reach the conclusion that "taxpayers should have the power to direct their taxes to areas they want funded", based on the simple diagram above?
 
Are you aware of what is missing in your one track flow chart narrative? Life doesn't evolve by flow chart specificity of adapting to the moment here each biolgical result only exists in series parallel positions so far.

you have 8 spontaneous positions possible and each ancestor can only do one at a time so you divide the whole population of 5 basic ancestral lineages having 5 generation gaps totalling the 8.14 billions people occupyingspace picking one of the eight positions offered.

add into that those particitpating and those not interested in the stupidity of your ideology.
 
There is a reason that adults have come up with government for the things we collectively want to pay for, it is because it works. It is not the solution to all life's problems, but it should not be completely gotten rid of.
 
There is a reason that adults have come up with government for the things we collectively want to pay for, it is because it works. It is not the solution to all life's problems, but it should not be completely gotten rid of.


Did anyone say "it should be completely gotten rid of"?
 
What made you reach the conclusion that "taxpayers should have the power to direct their taxes to areas they want funded", based on the simple diagram above?
Comprehension troubles Dio? I said it was discussed many times in the past and rejected.
 
There is a reason that adults have come up with government for the things we collectively want to pay for, it is because it works. It is not the solution to all life's problems, but it should not be completely gotten rid of.
When did "we" collectively decide to give $50 mil to the ragheads for condoms? Are you stupid?
 
When did "we" collectively decide to give $50 mil to the ragheads for condoms? Are you stupid?
That was a lie, don't you remember? There are no American condoms going to the Gaza Strip. We are not even able to get much food in. Hamas has banned condoms. $50 million worth of government condoms would be an absolutely huge amount of condoms.

$50 million is what USAID paid for all the condoms sent to Southern Africa. There is a province in Mozambique called Gaza. No relationship to the Gaza Strip, just happens to sound the same. The trump administration saw the word Gaza, and ran with the lie.

Can we have an effective government based on lies? trump, Musk, and the rest of the alt right are trying to govern with lies. And it simply will not work.

Southern Africa has the highest AIDS rates of any region. Spending a small amount of money to get AIDS under control would be a good idea. AIDS is a infectious disease, so keeping it from spreading helps everyone, including the USA. The Southern Africans are Sub Saharan Africans, so not "ragheads." I could go on, but the point is that Yakuda and the rest of the alt right have nothing to offer a reasonable debate.
 
Are you aware of what is missing in your one track flow chart narrative? Life doesn't evolve by flow chart specificity of adapting to the moment here each biolgical result only exists in series parallel positions so far.

you have 8 spontaneous positions possible and each ancestor can only do one at a time so you divide the whole population of 5 basic ancestral lineages having 5 generation gaps totalling the 8.14 billions people occupyingspace picking one of the eight positions offered.

add into that those particitpating and those not interested in the stupidity of your ideology.
IOW, just a bunch of whining. Got it.
 
That was a lie, don't you remember? There are no American condoms going to the Gaza Strip. We are not even able to get much food in. Hamas has banned condoms. $50 million worth of government condoms would be an absolutely huge amount of condoms.

$50 million is what USAID paid for all the condoms sent to Southern Africa. There is a province in Mozambique called Gaza. No relationship to the Gaza Strip, just happens to sound the same. The trump administration saw the word Gaza, and ran with the lie.

Can we have an effective government based on lies? trump, Musk, and the rest of the alt right are trying to govern with lies. And it simply will not work.

Southern Africa has the highest AIDS rates of any region. Spending a small amount of money to get AIDS under control would be a good idea. AIDS is a infectious disease, so keeping it from spreading helps everyone, including the USA. The Southern Africans are Sub Saharan Africans, so not "ragheads." I could go on, but the point is that Yakuda and the rest of the alt right have nothing to offer a reasonable debate.
I don't give a shit where the money for condoms went dumbass when we have people in California and the Carolinas with out homes and homeless vets her in America. You STILL cant figure out why you lost can you?
 
That was a lie, don't you remember? There are no American condoms going to the Gaza Strip. We are not even able to get much food in. Hamas has banned condoms. $50 million worth of government condoms would be an absolutely huge amount of condoms.

$50 million is what USAID paid for all the condoms sent to Southern Africa. There is a province in Mozambique called Gaza. No relationship to the Gaza Strip, just happens to sound the same. The trump administration saw the word Gaza, and ran with the lie.
It was not a lie. It was a mistake. They've corrected the mistake that they made. Everybody makes mistakes from time to time.

That's the difference between this administration and the prior regime. This administration is open/transparent/honest, quickly correcting any mistakes that they may make along the way. The prior regime, on the other hand, was closed/secretive/dishonest, purposely manipulating and lying to people.
Can we have an effective government based on lies? trump, Musk, and the rest of the alt right are trying to govern with lies. And it simply will not work.
In conclusion, $50 million taxpayer dollars, which are meant to fund THIS government's constitutional operation, were instead wasted via sending condoms to Africa. That's not an effective use of tax dollars.
Southern Africa has the highest AIDS rates of any region.
So? Why should the USA be "fixing the world's problems" if they can't even fix their own immediate problems? Why are you concerned with the order of the world when you can't even keep your own room in order?
Spending a small amount of money to get AIDS under control would be a good idea.
Okay, so donate some of your own hard earned money (instead of MINE) to an organization that is working to get AIDS under control in Africa.

Charity (instead of thievery & money laundering). Try it sometime.
 
I don't give a shit where the money for condoms went dumbass
We know you do not care about the truth, which is why you lie so openly.

Congress decided it was a good idea to try to reduce HIV contagion, and I agree.
 
It was not a lie. It was a mistake.
Somehow that is even worse. They do not even care about the truth to know it themselves.

That's not an effective use of tax dollars.
Limiting the spread of HIV means fewer Americans will also get HIV. That will save money.

Why should the USA be "fixing the world's problems"
Because we live in the world?

Why are you concerned with the order of the world when you can't even keep your own room in order?
My room is in order.
 
Somehow that is even worse.
Not at all.
They do not even care about the truth to know it themselves.
No, they care about the truth enough to correct a mistake that they made. Nobody is perfect. Correcting a mistake is being honest.

I'd rather have that than have lefties who purposely lie, get caught lying, pretend that there's "no evidence" of their lies, and still continue to lie anyway. They often lie by omission. They've even formed a whole religion based upon lying by omission; it's called Climate Change.
Limiting the spread of HIV means fewer Americans will also get HIV. That will save money.
I'll give you a moment to stop and truly think about what you just said here. I'll even help you out a bit.

This discussion is about sending $50M to the Gaza Province in Africa "for condoms", so the "aid" is supposedly benefitting the people who live there (and supposedly not being laundered back to politicians, but I digress). Granted that these people largely survive via subsistence farming, I'm guessing that there aren't very many of those people traveling between southeastern Africa and the USA, so I don't see how "limiting the spread" of HIV in the Gaza Province affects US citizens getting HIV, especially since HIV is sexually transmitted (you're speaking of it like it's airborne).
Because we live in the world?
What about all the other countries? Don't they also "live in the world"?
My room is in order.
I don't believe you.
 
Back
Top