Dems with data are 'extremely bullish' on Trump winning, Harris may lose six swing states: analyst

ExpressLane said:

Dems with data are 'extremely bullish' on Trump winning, Harris may lose six swing states: analyst​

Political analyst Mark Halperin said this week that both Democrats and Republicans believe former President Trump’s chances of winning the election are looking strong after seeing recent private polling data.

Appearing on a livestream on his media platform 2WAY, Halperin said people on both sides of the political aisle familiar with the polls have told him they’ve seen Vice President Kamala Harris’ electoral prospects slip, and that they’re leaning towards a Trump victory being in the cards.

"In the conversations I'm having with Trump people and Democrats with data, they are extremely bullish on Trump's chances in the last 48 hours. Extremely bullish," Halperin said.

The pundit characterized the Harris campaign as an "experiment" that's encountering issues.

Can you win a short campaign with an untested candidate? And what I’m telling you is happening in private polling is she’s got a problem now," he said.

He pointed to a recent New York Times poll showing that Harris is up over Trump by three points nationally. However, he noted this lead is just on the cusp of the poll’s margin of error and that her team would rather her be at +4 to be confident she’s winning.

Halperin then mentioned a Wall Street Journal report on internal polling done by Sen. Tammy Baldwin’s, D-Wis., re-election campaign showing that Harris is down by three points in Wisconsin.

"There’s no path without Wisconsin," he said, bringing up the numbers from Baldwin’s camp. He added, "We all said yesterday, Wisconsin and Michigan are looking worse for Harris than before."

Halperin added that internal polling reveals that Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign is in "a lot of trouble." (ABC/The View)

He then spoke to his fellow pundits, including former Trump White House press secretary Sean Spicer and Democratic political strategist Dan Turrentine, about how Baldwin publishing these numbers is an "alarm bell" for the rest of the party.

"And so you do it to sound the alarm bell, you are sounding the alarm bell in the party," Turrentine added.

Further on in the stream, Halperin chastised his pro-Harris viewers, stating, "For you Harris people on here complaining that we’re talking about problems in the Harris campaign, you’re welcome to put your head in the sand about it. If you want to go watch MSNBC primetime and hear how great things are going for the Harris campaign, you’re welcome...
======================================

Dems are losing in the swing states. Kamala is in big trouble.
Click to expand...
First of all: Newsmax - LOL!

Second of all - a little information about your Newsmax author:

In response to more than a dozen allegations of workplace sexual harassment and sexual assault at his prior position at ABC News, Halperin was fired by both Showtime Networks and NBC News towards the end of October 2017.

Since 2020, Halperin has appeared on Newsmax TV as a contributor and is the host of their weekly Sunday show, Mark Halperin's Focus Group.
Click to expand...
So, he's a trumptard rapist banished from mainstream media and has a grudge.

trump is going to lose - I'm certain of it!
 
BartenderElite said:
You ignore the polls when they don't favor Trump, and create threads when they do.

Fact it, the race is extremely tight, and a month is an eternity in politics. I've seen other prognostications that favor Harris, but I'm not shouting from the rooftops. It's likely to be a tense election night for both sides, though I'm sure Trump will declare victory long before the final tallies are in.
Click to expand...
The OP source is an author who is a butthurt rapist banished from MSNBC and Showtime trying to make a living on the soon to be defunct Newmax. Pay no attention.
 
archives said:
Not that it matters, there will always be another poll, but your source here, Mark Halperin, works for Newsmax, so any “private polling” he offers should be taken with a grain of salt
Click to expand...
Not only that, but Newsmax was the only shitheads who would hire Halperin after he was fired from Showtime for being a perv rapist abuser.
 
Nomad said:
trumpers will say anything if they think it will help trump.

In this case, I'm guessing the goal is to get as many Harris voters as possible to believe she doesn't have a chance anyway, and just stay home.
Click to expand...
Not likely. Very few Harris voters read Newmax.
 
gfm7175 said:
And apparently Democrats think that they are LOSING.

How do I know??

Not only has Kamala been whining about wanting another debate, as a sore LOSER whines about wanting a REMATCH, but Democrats are spending money and campaigning in states that they are trying to HOLD ONTO, not advance into... Democrats are playing DEFENSE, not offense.
Click to expand...
You are disconnected from reality. Harris is on a media blitz and trump is ducking interviews like the cowardly little bitch he is.
 
A little more about the OP's article author:

In December 2011, Halperin was listed as number 1 in Salon's 2011 Hack List, his reporting described as "shallow and predictable" as well as "both fixated solely on the horse race and also uniquely bad at analyzing the horse race"

Alex Shephard, writing in The New Republic, criticized his coverage for being "totally fixated" on the horse race and for shallow analysis, and "that he’s wanted to carry Donald Trump's bags for years."
Click to expand...
 
Althea said:
Remember the golden days of 'Red Wave!!!!'?

How cute that was.
Click to expand...

It really was adorable...

tumblr_mx7gmfv18M1r8bvzso1_500.gif
 
LurchAddams said:
Why is it that all trump-fluffers are evil fucking bastards? trumpism is a disease, man!
Click to expand...
IRL they are probably normal people. Glaringly ignorant, but nowhere near as evil as they pretend to be here.

I just wonder why they all believe that Russian propaganda sites would make credible sources?
 
I did an exercise where I challenged myself to consider the ramifications and coping mechanisms I would use, first with one Presidential Candidate winning (or at least, taking the office), and then with the other.


In the process, I forced myself to consider what would be both the upsides and downsides of each Candidate assuming office.


I worked to not go into unspecific or hyperbolic projections, just the simple, everyday life things I would need to do, to deal with either outcome.


This reinforced and clarified my voting decision. It also set a plan to cope with things not going as I wished.


Either way, I don't things will be easy for America over the next few years, but I think they will be survivable.


-
 
I believe that the biggest need America has, in the near future, is the improve the election system integrity and perception of fairness. It is not enough to simply state that there are no problems, there has to be a broad public perception that steps and measures are in place to insure fairness.


I believe we have allowed American little "d" democracy to slide into a near total control oligarchy. There is often an attitude of sneering contempt for daring to require the most basic of vote-integrity measures.


I know many people on the Left are in complete denial that any form of vote-fraud even exists. Well, that does nothing but cause everyone in society to lose faith and confidence in our government.


Its not that hard to provide thorough vote integrity monitors, require that all ballot tabulating facilities and operations remain open for political party observers and the press from all political leans.


Additionally, back ground checks of poll workers, and periodic verification of the registered voter rolls for duplicates, dead people, clearly fictitious characters, and illegals, should be a standard part of our elections.


Most importantly, we need to require a current, verified, photo ID to vote.

-
 
BartenderElite said:
Know what I'll do?

Accept it and move on. Because that's what people NORMALLY do in elections, realizing that they win some & lose some.

I certainly won't stomp my feet, riot and say "rigged" for the next 4 years. Like the babies do.
Click to expand...
No. You will receive the latest programming from your mind masters and you will OBEY them. If they tell you to believe that there was election fraud due to Russian interference, you will OBEY them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top