What did Hunter do for the money? Joe is very very adamant about being in touch with hHunter on a daily basis ...that's how...How is that evidence the father had anything to do with it? How is that evidence anything criminal took place?
What did Hunter do for the money? Joe is very very adamant about being in touch with hHunter on a daily basis ...that's how...How is that evidence the father had anything to do with it? How is that evidence anything criminal took place?
Wrong, seen a lot of circumstantial evidence but zero real proofOf course it does. You've seen it we've all seen it.
The Bank records do not corroborate anything other than money coming in from his business.Let's see...
Bagman's business partners say he took bribes
Bagman's clients say he took bribes
There are bank records that corroborate that.
There are tax records that show Bagman used classic money laundering techniques to hide those transactions
There are e-mails and phone records that openly show Bagman shaking down clients that have been verified as authentic
Bagman and his family keep changing their story about all this as the evidence pours in
I think he was a lawyer and energy executive? Why does that matter, they could have given him money for free and it would not be a crime.What did Hunter do for the money?
Lots of circumstantial evidence against Hunter, not Joe.Wrong, seen a lot of circumstantial evidence but zero real proof
You people are whacked, if there existed even one iota, one crumb, anything that real evidence existed the GOP would have started actual impeachment proceedings by now, and they have not, four years “investigating” and they got nothing, this single fact alone speaks the truth
But they didn't give him the money for free...I think he was a lawyer and energy executive? Why does that matter, they could have given him money for free and it would not be a crime.
Your saying “he knew exactly what Hunter was doing” isn’t proof, you got to offer actual proof, evidence, hard facts that “he knew exactly what Hunter was doing,” otherwise, all you got is innuendoHe's guilty... He knew exactly what hunter was doing and i'm sure they discussed it many times... It would be impossible for him not to know and not be involved.
Exactly, a fact the cult refuses to acceptLots of circumstantial evidence against Hunter, not Joe.
Hunter even admitted that he discussed things with Joe. He just said his dad didnt benefit financially... And we know that's a lie...Lots of circumstantial evidence against Hunter, not Joe.
Okay... What do you think he thought Hunter was doing to get all that money? He knew what Hunter was doing... Not only were they talking every day but they were traveling together and living together and living togethe..Your saying “he knew exactly what Hunter was doing” isn’t proof, you got to offer actual proof, evidence, hard facts that “he knew exactly what Hunter was doing,” otherwise, all you got is innuendo
How do you know?But they didn't give him the money for free...
That is not illegal, is it?Hunter even admitted that he discussed things with Joe. He just said his dad didnt benefit financially... And we know that's a lie...
Is it okay to lie? If something is Legal you don't need to lie...That is not illegal, is it?
Shared bank account. Stoo the dumbshit.How is that evidence the father had anything to do with it? How is that evidence anything criminal took place?
You have some evidence?Okay... What do you think he thought Hunter was doing to get all that money? He knew what Hunter was doing... Not only were they talking every day but they were traveling together and living together and living togethe..
Where is the lie? And no lying generally is not illegal, or Trump would be serving 50 life sentences.Is it okay to lie? If something is Legal you don't need to lie...
Evidence of shared bank accounts?Shared bank account. Stoo the dumbshit.
Congress is not a body that can bring criminal charges against anyone. They are a legislative body and looking into corruption within government.Is that why the Repub congressional investigation charged him with bribery? Oh, they did not. he was investigated for years and the Reds found nothing. The point of it was to convince Trumpys that it exists even though they have no proof and could not charge him. It surely worked on you, but then every lie they tell works on you.
Sure they do. For example, why did Bagman send all of the money he was getting from Burisma to a bank on Malta known for being a front for money laundering?The Bank records do not corroborate anything other than money coming in from his business.
Where is there any evidence Joe Biden was in involved in anything?