“We’re still without a decision in Trump v. United States 25 days after Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, which involves Donald Trump’s nonsensical claim to absolute immunity for trying to overturn the 2020 election.”
“Twenty-five is exactly the number of days it took the high court to decide Trump v. Anderson after oral argument. That’s the March decision in which the court overturnedthe Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that would have taken Trump off the ballot as an insurrectionist.”
“At the oral argument, the conservative justices seemed to be trying to convince us that the case couldn’t be decided quickly because of the complexities surrounding hypothetical situations that could arise around presidential immunity in the future. Conservative principles of constitutional jurisprudenceobligate federal judges to rule on the specific “case” or “controversy” in front of them.“
“The key point is that the Colorado case took less time than this one — even though it was a harder case, especially with the court having to explain away ignoring the 14th Amendment’s words that disqualify an insurrectionist from holding office.”
“Americans want to know before they vote if Trump is innocent or guilty of using unlawful means to interfere with the 2020 certification of President Biden’s election”
thehill.com
Keep in mind, Smith initially requested the SCOTUS take up this case last December
Americans need to know before they vote if one of the candidates running for office is guilty of attempting to sabotage an election, apparently a fact the Supreme Court doesn’t think is relevant
Given recent upside down flags and such is there any doubt Trump has contaminated the SCOTUS just as he has other once respected American traditions and institutions. And all just to satisfy his own personal narcissism
“Twenty-five is exactly the number of days it took the high court to decide Trump v. Anderson after oral argument. That’s the March decision in which the court overturnedthe Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that would have taken Trump off the ballot as an insurrectionist.”
“At the oral argument, the conservative justices seemed to be trying to convince us that the case couldn’t be decided quickly because of the complexities surrounding hypothetical situations that could arise around presidential immunity in the future. Conservative principles of constitutional jurisprudenceobligate federal judges to rule on the specific “case” or “controversy” in front of them.“
“The key point is that the Colorado case took less time than this one — even though it was a harder case, especially with the court having to explain away ignoring the 14th Amendment’s words that disqualify an insurrectionist from holding office.”
“Americans want to know before they vote if Trump is innocent or guilty of using unlawful means to interfere with the 2020 certification of President Biden’s election”
The delay in Trump’s immunity case shows what’s at stake in November
You don’t need to be a constitutional scholar to know what’s going on.
thehill.com
Keep in mind, Smith initially requested the SCOTUS take up this case last December
Americans need to know before they vote if one of the candidates running for office is guilty of attempting to sabotage an election, apparently a fact the Supreme Court doesn’t think is relevant
Given recent upside down flags and such is there any doubt Trump has contaminated the SCOTUS just as he has other once respected American traditions and institutions. And all just to satisfy his own personal narcissism