Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
You cannot project YOUR problems on Trump or anybody else, Sock.

You cannot project YOUR problems on Trump or anybody else, Sock.
Laughing at yourself now?
Many of the attacks are against liberal Christian churches who are displaying pride flags. In other words, 'Christians' attack a church for opening their doors to the LGBTQ community. You must be SO proud of those terrorists.
No, it didn't come from any so-called 'report'. There is no 'report'.
Then how do they know there is an increase in attacks? If there is no report the OP from the Family Research Council must be a lie. You missed the entire message of the post.
From the OP:
A report by the Family Research Council found a significant rise in attacks on Christian churches in the United States over the past five years, with a record 436 incidents in 2023 including vandalism, arson, bomb threats, and gun violence.
Not a report. An article.
Learn English, Sock. It really is better to learn English.
Police departments and the FBI all report increase in crime against Christian churches, usually by Democrats (most often pushing child murder, sexual deviancy, etc).
You still haven't read the OP. The article summarized a report. The report contained the information about increased violence.
Show us one police or FBI report showing an increase in violence by a Democrat.
I've read the OP and the link, Sock. Not a report. An article. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Attempted negative proof fallacy. Redefinition fallacy.
The source of the article was a report. Read it again.
Not a report. An article. Redefinition fallacy.
LIF. Grow up. You cannot blame YOUR problems of redefinition upon me or anybody else, Sock.You are the one attempting to redefine a report into an article.
Length of either means nothing to the definition.Reports, not articles, are 183 pages,
What data?collecting and analyzing data,
Either can describe events.and describing the events.
Yet it's Democrats and radical Islam.Not one word about any of them being Democrats.
Like Democrats.The incidents at historically black churches were much more likely to be white supremacist groups.
LIF. Grow up. You cannot blame YOUR problems of redefinition upon me or anybody else, Sock.
Length of either means nothing to the definition.
What data?
Either can describe events.
Yet it's Democrats and radical Islam.
Like Democrats.
LIF. Grow up. You cannot blame YOUR problems of redefinition upon me or anybody else, Sock.
Length of either means nothing to the definition.
What data?
You obviously did not read the report.
An article is not a report. Redefinition fallacy.You don't get to decide what others choose to call their report.
No data. I read the article.The data was all the incidents of violence against Christian churches. You obviously failed to read the report.
No report. I assume you mean the article in the link. So what?Nowhere did the report claim Democrats committed the acts.
An article is not a report. Redefinition fallacy.
No data. I read the article.
No report. I assume you mean the article in the link. So what?
Democrats committed many of the acts.