Very good! Their rights should've suspended when they've shown that can't reasonably exercise that right. Apparently there's hope for you
Obama had a mechanism in place to do just that and it was rescinded by the Republicans. You know. Your people.
Very good! Their rights should've suspended when they've shown that can't reasonably exercise that right. Apparently there's hope for you
where did you go?
I replied to your sophomoric questions, now it is your turn
You asked about the rights of an individual in Maine. So what about the rights of an individual in Mexico
Do you have the power to intervene in what he can possess? if no, why is this different?
You are, when you consider an AR-15 is not a musket.
this is you, avoiding reality so you don't have to admit you're wrong.
where did you go?
I replied to your sophomoric questions, now it is your turn
You asked about the rights of an individual in Maine. So what about the rights of an individual in Mexico
Do you have the power to intervene in what he can possess? if no, why is this different?
Link
But you are with the mentally not being able to own guns. How oddsI am not against that, but seems like it would be a conflict of absolute rights.
the degrees that lead you to believe that limits should make others safer.......which is in direct conflict with the founders and the constitution
Good question, we will elect people to make that call. We are a Democracy after all.
you most certainly are judging the past by todays standards.
First of all no. I barely trust the people I vote for to do the right thing let alone elect people who will preemptively decide who's rights should be suspended . Are you fucking kidding me? BTW all your whining doesn't make us a democracy.
The musket was the gun of war in its day and the founding fathers were fine with it.
I embrace reality. For instance, I would NEVER claim something critical to the function of a modern society “cannot be necessary” simply because there’s no mention of it in the Constitution.
That kind of claim would be the height of stupidity, don’t you think?
Can you bear an ICBM? They look like they are pretty heavy.So why do I not have a right to an ICBM? It has to do with safety of others, right?
They had more time back then.RIght but it took a while to kill 18 people with it. You are judging today based on historical standards.
Obama had a mechanism in place to do just that and it was rescinded by the Republicans. You know. Your people.
I do not know the legal rights of an individual in Mexico, I believe all people have some rights they are born with and governments should respect.
I am not a voter in Mexico and not part of their DEMOCRACY, so I do not have the power to have any say so.
You do not believe we have absolute rights?
And dangerous crazy people shouldn't be committed.Sure, all convicts in prison cells should have their own firearm.![]()
Can you bear an ICBM? They look like they are pretty heavy.